Materials / Compare
Aluminum 2024-T351 vs. Plastic POM/Acetal
Compare Aluminum 2024-T351 vs. Plastic POM/Acetal strength, stiffness, weight and thermal properties.
| Try it on a partA bracket to run stress or thermal on, free in your browser | Open in LessCAD | Open in LessCAD |
|---|---|---|
| Mechanical | ||
| Yield strength | 324MPasourcetypical, 0.2% offset, .500 in dia specimen | 69MPasourcetypical (single ASTM D638 tensile strength) |
| Ultimate tensile strength | 469MPasourcetypical6.8x stronger | 69MPasourcetypical |
| Compressive strength | not sourced | 124MPasourcecompressive stress at 10% deformation |
| Flexural strength | not sourced | 99MPasourceflexural yield strength, typical |
| Elongation at break | 19%sourcetypical, in 4D | 75%sourcetypical |
| Young's modulus (stiffness) | 73.1GPasourcetypical26.1x stiffer | 2.8GPasourcetypical |
| Density | 2,770kg/m³sourcenominal | 1,420kg/m³sourcetypical (DuPont product information for Delrin 100 NC010; 'The data listed here fall within the normal range of product properties') |
| Strength to weight | 117kN·m/kg2.41x higher | 48.6kN·m/kg |
| Stiffness to weight | 26.4MN·m/kg13.4x higher | 1.97MN·m/kg |
| Poisson's ratio | 0.33sourcetypical (handbook physical constant), all tempers | 0.35sourcetypical |
| Shear modulus | 27.5GPa26.5x stiffer in shear | 1.04GPa |
| Bulk modulus | 71.7GPa | 3.11GPa |
| Speed of sound | 5,137m/s | 1,404m/s |
| Thermal | ||
| Thermal conductivity | 120W/m·Ksourcetypical, 20 °C | 0.4W/m·Ksourcetypical |
| Thermal expansion | 22.9µm/m·Ksourcetypical, mean 20-100 °C | 122µm/m·Ksourcemean, 29 to 60 °C |
| 100 mm part over a 50 °C swing | 115µm growth5.33x less | 610µm growth |
| Specific heat | 875J/kg·Ksourcetypical, at 100 °C | 1,465J/kg·Ksourceaverage -18 to 100 °C, Delrin acetal resins (not grade-specific) |
| Heats up and cools (diffusivity) | 49.5mm²/s257x faster | 0.192mm²/s |
| Thermal shock resistance | 15,561W/m296x more resistant | 52.5W/m |
| Melting point | 502–638°Csourcemelting range | 175°Csourcecrystalline melting point |
| Max service temperature | not sourced | 125°CsourceHDT 1.8 MPa (annealed) |
| Values for | 2024-T4/T351, Kaiser Aluminum sheet, coil & plate typical datasheet; Poisson from MIL-HDBK-5J | DuPont Delrin 100 acetal homopolymer, Table 2 'Typical Properties of Delrin Acetal Resins' (ASTM methods), Delrin Design Guide Module III hosted on delrin.com |
Every value links to the document that states it. "Not sourced" means no citable source states it (or only a specification minimum); figures computed from it are left out too.
Questions
Is Aluminum 2024-T351 stronger than Plastic POM/Acetal?
Aluminum 2024-T351 is stronger: its yield strength is 324 MPa against 69 MPa for Plastic POM/Acetal (4.7x).
Which is lighter, Aluminum 2024-T351 or Plastic POM/Acetal?
Plastic POM/Acetal is lighter: 1,420 kg/m³ against 2,770 kg/m³ for Aluminum 2024-T351.
Which is stiffer, Aluminum 2024-T351 or Plastic POM/Acetal?
Aluminum 2024-T351 is stiffer: Young's modulus 73.1 GPa against 2.8 GPa for Plastic POM/Acetal, so the same part in Aluminum 2024-T351 deflects less under the same load.
Which is lighter for the same job, Aluminum 2024-T351 or Plastic POM/Acetal?
For the same stiffness or strength: Aluminum 2024-T351 is lighter for a stiff rod or tie (tension), stiff beam (bending), stiff panel or plate, strong rod or tie, strong beam, strong panel or plate.
| Part that must be | Aluminum 2024-T351 | Plastic POM/Acetal |
|---|---|---|
| Stiff rod or tie (tension) | lighter | 13.4x heavier |
| Stiff beam (bending) | lighter | 2.62x heavier |
| Stiff panel or plate | lighter | 1.52x heavier |
| Strong rod or tie | lighter | 2.41x heavier |
| Strong beam | lighter | 44% heavier |
| Strong panel or plate | lighter | 11% heavier |
For the same stiffness or strength, mass scales with density over stiffness (or strength) raised to a power set by how the part is loaded: 1 for a rod in tension, 1/2 for a beam in bending, 1/3 for a panel (the standard material-selection indices).
Which conducts heat better, Aluminum 2024-T351 or Plastic POM/Acetal?
Aluminum 2024-T351 conducts heat better: 120 W/m·K against 0.4 W/m·K for Plastic POM/Acetal.
Which expands less with temperature?
Aluminum 2024-T351 expands less: 22.9 µm/m·K against 122 µm/m·K for Plastic POM/Acetal.
Among 59 materials
Related comparisons
- Aluminum 2024-T351 vs. Aluminum
- Aluminum 2024-T351 vs. Aluminum 6061-T6
- Aluminum 2024-T351 vs. DMLS AlSi10Mg Aluminum
- Aluminum 2024-T351 vs. Concrete
- Plastic POM/Acetal vs. SLA Resin Standard
- Plastic POM/Acetal vs. Plastic Polycarbonate
- Plastic POM/Acetal vs. Plastic PMMA
- Plastic POM/Acetal vs. Plastic Nylon