Materials / Compare

Aluminum 5052-H32 vs. Plastic PMMA

Compare Aluminum 5052-H32 vs. Plastic PMMA strength, stiffness, weight and thermal properties.

Change either side
Aluminum 5052-H32Wrought
Plastic PMMABulk polymer (molded or machined)
Try it on a partA bracket to run stress or thermal on, free in your browserOpen in LessCADOpen in LessCAD
Mechanical
Yield strength195MPasourcetypical, 0.2% offsetnot given (tensile used)
Ultimate tensile strength230MPasourcetypical80MPasourcetypical, 23 °C
Compressive strengthnot sourced110MPasourcecompressive yield stress, typical
Flexural strengthnot sourced115MPasourcetypical
Elongation at break12%sourcetypical2.18x more ductile5.5%sourcetypical
Young's modulus (stiffness)70GPasourcetypical3.3GPasourcetypical, short-term
Density2,685kg/m³sourcenominal1,190kg/m³sourcetypical
Strength to weight72.6kN·m/kg8% higher67.2kN·m/kg
Stiffness to weight26.1MN·m/kg9.4x higher2.77MN·m/kg
Poisson's ratio0.33sourcetypical (handbook physical constant)0.37sourcetypical
Shear modulus26.3GPa21.9x stiffer in shear1.2GPa
Bulk modulus68.6GPa4.23GPa
Speed of sound5,106m/s1,665m/s
Thermal
Thermal conductivity138W/m·Ksourcebase material: 5052 in O temper (same alloy, annealed); Kaiser typical0.19W/m·Ksourcetypical
Thermal expansion23.8µm/m·Ksourcetypical, mean 20-100 °C70µm/m·Ksource0-50 °C
100 mm part over a 50 °C swing119µm growth2.94x less350µm growth
Specific heat963J/kg·Ksourceat 100 °C (212 °F); table covers O, H32, H34, H36, H381,470J/kg·Ksourcetypical
Heats up and cools (diffusivity)53.4mm²/s491x faster0.109mm²/s
Thermal shock resistance10,822W/m261x more resistant41.5W/m
Melting point605–650°Csourcemelting rangenot sourced
Max service temperaturenot sourced80°Csourcemax. permanent service temperature
Values for5052-H32, Kaiser Aluminum tube & pipe typical datasheet (mechanical, CTE, melting); MIL-HDBK-5J (Poisson, density, specific heat)Röhm PLEXIGLAS GS 0F00 cast acrylic sheet, typical values at 23 °C / 50 % RH (Röhm Technical Information Ref. No. 211-1)

Every value links to the document that states it. "Not sourced" means no citable source states it (or only a specification minimum); figures computed from it are left out too.

Questions

Is Aluminum 5052-H32 stronger than Plastic PMMA?

Aluminum 5052-H32 is stronger: its yield strength is 195 MPa against tensile strength 80 MPa for Plastic PMMA (2.44x).

Which is lighter, Aluminum 5052-H32 or Plastic PMMA?

Plastic PMMA is lighter: 1,190 kg/m³ against 2,685 kg/m³ for Aluminum 5052-H32.

Which is stiffer, Aluminum 5052-H32 or Plastic PMMA?

Aluminum 5052-H32 is stiffer: Young's modulus 70 GPa against 3.3 GPa for Plastic PMMA, so the same part in Aluminum 5052-H32 deflects less under the same load.

Which is lighter for the same job, Aluminum 5052-H32 or Plastic PMMA?

For the same stiffness or strength: Aluminum 5052-H32 is lighter for a stiff rod or tie (tension), stiff beam (bending), stiff panel or plate, strong rod or tie; Plastic PMMA is lighter for a strong beam, strong panel or plate.

Part that must beAluminum 5052-H32Plastic PMMA
Stiff rod or tie (tension)lighter9.4x heavier
Stiff beam (bending)lighter2.04x heavier
Stiff panel or platelighter23% heavier
Strong rod or tielighter8% heavier
Strong beam25% heavierlighter
Strong panel or plate45% heavierlighter

For the same stiffness or strength, mass scales with density over stiffness (or strength) raised to a power set by how the part is loaded: 1 for a rod in tension, 1/2 for a beam in bending, 1/3 for a panel (the standard material-selection indices).

Which is more ductile, Aluminum 5052-H32 or Plastic PMMA?

Aluminum 5052-H32 stretches further before it breaks: 12% elongation at break against 5.5% for Plastic PMMA.

Which conducts heat better, Aluminum 5052-H32 or Plastic PMMA?

Aluminum 5052-H32 conducts heat better: 138 W/m·K against 0.19 W/m·K for Plastic PMMA.

Which expands less with temperature?

Aluminum 5052-H32 expands less: 23.8 µm/m·K against 70 µm/m·K for Plastic PMMA.

Among 59 materials

1k10k0.1110100Density (kg/m³)Young's modulus (GPa)Plastic PLAPlastic PETGPlastic ABSPlastic TPUPlastic NylonAluminumSteelIronTitaniumSteel AISI 1018Stainless 304Stainless 316Aluminum 6061-T6Aluminum 7075-T6Brass C360Copper C110GlassSteel AISI 1045Steel AISI 4340Steel A992Stainless 303Stainless 17-4PHAluminum 2024-T351Aluminum 7050-T7451Titanium Ti-6Al-4VBrass C260Nickel Inconel 718Magnesium AZ31B-H24Zinc Zamak 3Plastic ABS (bulk/injection)Plastic PolycarbonatePlastic POM/AcetalPlastic Nylon PA6Plastic Nylon PA66Plastic PEEKPlastic UHMWPEPlastic HDPEPlastic PolypropyleneFDM ASAFDM PolycarbonateFDM PAHT-CFFDM HIPSSLA Resin Tough 2000SLS PA12 NylonDMLS AlSi10Mg AluminumDMLS Ti-6Al-4V ELI TitaniumDMLS 316L Stainless SteelDMLS 17-4PH Stainless SteelAluminum 5052-H32Plastic PMMA
Stiffness against density
1k10k101001kDensity (kg/m³)Yield strength (MPa)Plastic PLAPlastic PETGPlastic ABSPlastic TPUPlastic NylonRubberAluminumSteelIronTitaniumSteel AISI 1018Stainless 304Stainless 316Aluminum 6061-T6Aluminum 7075-T6Brass C360Copper C110GlassSteel AISI 1045Steel AISI 4340Steel A992Stainless 303Stainless 17-4PHAluminum 2024-T351Aluminum 7050-T7451Titanium Ti-6Al-4VBrass C260Nickel Inconel 718Magnesium AZ31B-H24Zinc Zamak 3Plastic ABS (bulk/injection)Plastic PolycarbonatePlastic POM/AcetalPlastic Nylon PA6Plastic Nylon PA66Plastic PEEKPlastic PTFEPlastic UHMWPEPlastic HDPEPlastic PolypropyleneFDM ASAFDM PolycarbonateFDM PAHT-CFFDM HIPSSLA Resin Tough 2000SLA Resin Elastic 50ASLS PA12 NylonDMLS AlSi10Mg AluminumDMLS Ti-6Al-4V ELI TitaniumDMLS 316L Stainless SteelDMLS 17-4PH Stainless SteelBrickAluminum 5052-H32Plastic PMMA
Strength against density

Related comparisons