Materials / Compare
Aluminum 6061-T6 vs. SLS PA12 Nylon
Compare Aluminum 6061-T6 vs. SLS PA12 Nylon strength, stiffness, weight and thermal properties.
| Try it on a partA bracket to run stress or thermal on, free in your browser | Open in LessCAD | Open in LessCAD |
|---|---|---|
| Mechanical | ||
| Yield strength | 276MPasourcetypical, 0.2% offset, .500 in dia specimen | not given (tensile used) |
| Ultimate tensile strength | 310MPasourcetypical6.46x stronger | 48MPasourcetypical |
| Elongation at break | 17%sourcetypical, in 4D, 0.500 in dia specimen | 18%sourcetypical |
| Young's modulus (stiffness) | 68.3GPasourcetypical41.4x stiffer | 1.65GPasourcetypical |
| Density | 2,700kg/m³sourcenominal | 930kg/m³sourcetypical |
| Strength to weight | 102kN·m/kg1.98x higher | 51.6kN·m/kg |
| Stiffness to weight | 25.3MN·m/kg14.3x higher | 1.77MN·m/kg |
| Poisson's ratio | 0.33sourcetypical (handbook physical constant) | not sourced |
| Shear modulus | 25.7GPa | not sourced |
| Bulk modulus | 67GPa | not sourced |
| Speed of sound | 5,030m/s | 1,332m/s |
| Thermal | ||
| Thermal conductivity | 167W/m·Ksourcetypical, 20 °C | not sourced |
| Thermal expansion | 23.6µm/m·Ksourcetypical, mean 20-100 °C | not sourced |
| 100 mm part over a 50 °C swing | 118µm growth | not sourced |
| Specific heat | 896J/kg·Ksourcetypical, at 100 °C | not sourced |
| Heats up and cools (diffusivity) | 69mm²/s | not sourced |
| Thermal shock resistance | 19,159W/m | not sourced |
| Melting point | 582–652°Csourcesolidus-liquidus | 176°Csourcetypical |
| Max service temperature | not sourced | 64°CsourceHDT 1.8 MPa, X orientation |
| Values for | 6061-T6/T651, Kaiser Aluminum typical properties; Poisson from MIL-HDBK-5J | EOS PA 2200 (PA12) Material Data Sheet, process parameter 'Balance' at 120 µm layer thickness, X orientation, dry (conditioned values not given). Live MDS status 04.10.2026, last changed 10.09.2026; PDF via ?topdf=... link on the same page. |
Every value links to the document that states it. "Not sourced" means no citable source states it (or only a specification minimum); figures computed from it are left out too.
SLS PA12 Nylon is 3D printed: its properties depend on build direction and print settings; these are typical values.
Questions
Is Aluminum 6061-T6 stronger than SLS PA12 Nylon?
Aluminum 6061-T6 is stronger: its yield strength is 276 MPa against tensile strength 48 MPa for SLS PA12 Nylon (5.75x).
Which is lighter, Aluminum 6061-T6 or SLS PA12 Nylon?
SLS PA12 Nylon is lighter: 930 kg/m³ against 2,700 kg/m³ for Aluminum 6061-T6.
Which is stiffer, Aluminum 6061-T6 or SLS PA12 Nylon?
Aluminum 6061-T6 is stiffer: Young's modulus 68.3 GPa against 1.65 GPa for SLS PA12 Nylon, so the same part in Aluminum 6061-T6 deflects less under the same load.
Which is lighter for the same job, Aluminum 6061-T6 or SLS PA12 Nylon?
For the same stiffness or strength: Aluminum 6061-T6 is lighter for a stiff rod or tie (tension), stiff beam (bending), stiff panel or plate, strong rod or tie, strong beam; SLS PA12 Nylon is lighter for a strong panel or plate.
| Part that must be | Aluminum 6061-T6 | SLS PA12 Nylon |
|---|---|---|
| Stiff rod or tie (tension) | lighter | 14.3x heavier |
| Stiff beam (bending) | lighter | 2.22x heavier |
| Stiff panel or plate | lighter | 19% heavier |
| Strong rod or tie | lighter | 1.98x heavier |
| Strong beam | lighter | 11% heavier |
| Strong panel or plate | 21% heavier | lighter |
For the same stiffness or strength, mass scales with density over stiffness (or strength) raised to a power set by how the part is loaded: 1 for a rod in tension, 1/2 for a beam in bending, 1/3 for a panel (the standard material-selection indices).