Materials / Compare
Ceramic Alumina 96% vs. Plastic Polypropylene
Compare Ceramic Alumina 96% vs. Plastic Polypropylene strength, stiffness, weight and thermal properties.
| Try it on a partA sample part to run stress or thermal on, free in your browser | Open in LessCAD | Open in LessCAD |
|---|---|---|
| Mechanical | ||
| Yield strength | not given (tensile used) | 33MPasourcetypical, tensile stress at yield ISO 527 |
| Ultimate tensile strength | 221MPasourcetypical tensile strength, 25 °C (ACMA Test #4) | not sourced |
| Compressive strength | 2,068MPasourcetypical, 20 °C (ASTM-C773) | not sourced |
| Flexural strength | 358MPasourceflexural strength (MOR), 20 °C (ASTM-F417) | not sourced |
| Elongation at break | not sourced | not sourced |
| Young's modulus (stiffness) | 303GPasourcetypical, 20 °C (ASTM-C848) | 1.45GPasourcetypical, tensile modulus ISO 527 |
| Density | 3,720kg/m³sourcetypical (ASTM-C20) | 900kg/m³sourcetypical, 23 °C ISO 1183-1 |
| Strength to weight | 59.4kN·m/kg1.62x higher | 36.7kN·m/kg |
| Stiffness to weight | 81.5MN·m/kg50.6x higher | 1.61MN·m/kg |
| Poisson's ratio | 0.21sourcetypical, 20 °C (ASTM-C848) | 0.42sourcebase material: polypropylene homopolymer family (INEOS Olefins & Polymers USA, Typical Engineering Properties of Polypropylene) |
| Shear modulus | 125GPa245x stiffer in shear | 0.511GPa |
| Bulk modulus | 174GPa | 3.02GPa |
| Speed of sound | 9,025m/s | 1,269m/s |
| Thermal | ||
| Thermal conductivity | 24.7W/m·Ksourcetypical, 20 °C (ASTM-C408) | 0.17–0.22W/m·Ksourcebase material: polypropylene homopolymer family (INEOS Olefins & Polymers USA, Typical Engineering Properties of Polypropylene) |
| Thermal expansion | 8.2µm/m·Ksourcemean, 25-1000 °C (ASTM-C372) | 80–100µm/m·Ksourcebase material: polypropylene homopolymer family (INEOS Olefins & Polymers USA, Typical Engineering Properties of Polypropylene) |
| 100 mm part over a 50 °C swing | 41µm growth11x less | 450µm growth |
| Specific heat | 880J/kg·Ksourcetypical, 100 °C (ASTM-E1269) | not sourced |
| Heats up and cools (diffusivity) | 7.55mm²/s | not sourced |
| Thermal shock resistance | 1,736W/m60.7x more resistant | 28.6W/m |
| Max service temperature | not sourced | 90°CsourceHDT 0.45 MPa (ISO 75B), unannealed |
| Values for | CoorsTek AD-96, nominal 96% Al2O3 sintered alumina, typical values; CoorsTek "Ceramic Seal Material Properties" (© 2018, 01899 F). AD-96 is the general 96% grade, not the ADS-96R substrate grade. | LyondellBasell Moplen HP501H polypropylene homopolymer (general purpose), typical ISO values |
Every value links to the document that states it. "Not sourced" means no citable source states it (or only a specification minimum); figures computed from it are left out too.
Questions
Is Ceramic Alumina 96% stronger than Plastic Polypropylene?
Ceramic Alumina 96% is stronger: its tensile strength is 221 MPa against yield strength 33 MPa for Plastic Polypropylene (6.7x).
Which is lighter, Ceramic Alumina 96% or Plastic Polypropylene?
Plastic Polypropylene is lighter: 900 kg/m³ against 3,720 kg/m³ for Ceramic Alumina 96%.
Which is stiffer, Ceramic Alumina 96% or Plastic Polypropylene?
Ceramic Alumina 96% is stiffer: Young's modulus 303 GPa against 1.45 GPa for Plastic Polypropylene, so the same part in Ceramic Alumina 96% deflects less under the same load.
Which is lighter for the same job, Ceramic Alumina 96% or Plastic Polypropylene?
For the same stiffness or strength: Ceramic Alumina 96% is lighter for a stiff rod or tie (tension), stiff beam (bending), stiff panel or plate, strong rod or tie; Plastic Polypropylene is lighter for a strong beam, strong panel or plate.
| Part that must be | Ceramic Alumina 96% | Plastic Polypropylene |
|---|---|---|
| Stiff rod or tie (tension) | lighter | 50.6x heavier |
| Stiff beam (bending) | lighter | 3.5x heavier |
| Stiff panel or plate | lighter | 44% heavier |
| Strong rod or tie | lighter | 1.62x heavier |
| Strong beam | 16% heavier | lighter |
| Strong panel or plate | 1.6x heavier | lighter |
For the same stiffness or strength, mass scales with density over stiffness (or strength) raised to a power set by how the part is loaded: 1 for a rod in tension, 1/2 for a beam in bending, 1/3 for a panel (the standard material-selection indices).
Which conducts heat better, Ceramic Alumina 96% or Plastic Polypropylene?
Ceramic Alumina 96% conducts heat better: 24.7 W/m·K against 0.195 W/m·K for Plastic Polypropylene.
Which expands less with temperature?
Ceramic Alumina 96% expands less: 8.2 µm/m·K against 90 µm/m·K for Plastic Polypropylene.
Among 72 materials
Related comparisons
- Ceramic Alumina 96% vs. Ceramic Aluminum Nitride
- Ceramic Alumina 96% vs. Concrete
- Ceramic Alumina 96% vs. Iron
- Ceramic Alumina 96% vs. Stainless Steel 303
- Plastic Polypropylene vs. SLA Resin Tough 2000
- Plastic Polypropylene vs. Plastic ABS
- Plastic Polypropylene vs. SLS PA12 Nylon
- Plastic Polypropylene vs. Rubber