Materials / Compare

FDM PAHT-CF vs. SLA Resin Tough 2000

Compare FDM PAHT-CF vs. SLA Resin Tough 2000 strength, stiffness, weight and thermal properties.

Change either side
FDM PAHT-CF3D printed (FDM)
SLA Resin Tough 20003D printed (SLA resin)
Try it on a partA bracket to run stress or thermal on, free in your browserOpen in LessCADOpen in LessCAD
Mechanical
Yield strengthnot given (tensile used)40.4MPasourcetypical
Ultimate tensile strength92MPasourcetypical2.28x stronger40.4MPasourcetypical
Flexural strength125MPasourcetypical1.87x stronger in bending67MPasourcetypical
Elongation at break8.4%sourcetypical79%sourcetypical9.4x more ductile
Young's modulus (stiffness)3.86GPasourcetypical2.14x stiffer1.8GPasourcetypical
Density1,060kg/m³sourcetypical1,090kg/m³sourcetypical
Strength to weight86.8kN·m/kg2.34x higher37.1kN·m/kg
Stiffness to weight3.64MN·m/kg2.21x higher1.65MN·m/kg
Poisson's rationot sourcednot sourced
Shear modulusnot sourcednot sourced
Bulk modulusnot sourcednot sourced
Speed of sound1,908m/s1,285m/s
Thermal
Thermal conductivitynot sourcednot sourced
Thermal expansionnot sourced134µm/m·Ksourcemean 0-150 °C
100 mm part over a 50 °C swingnot sourced671µm growth
Specific heatnot sourcednot sourced
Heats up and cools (diffusivity)not sourcednot sourced
Thermal shock resistancenot sourcednot sourced
Melting point225°Csourcetypicalnot sourced
Glass transition70°Csourcetypical112°CsourceDMA
Max service temperature170°CsourceHDT 1.8 MPa2.98x hotter57°CsourceHDT 1.8 MPa
Values forBambu Lab PAHT-CF, TDS V3.0, printed specimens X-Y, dry state; nozzle 290 °C, bed 100 °C, 100 mm/s, 100% infill; annealed and dried 80 °C for 12 h before testing.Formlabs Tough 2000 Resin V2 (FLTO2002), TDS Rev. 01 10/06/2025; printed on Form 4 at 100 µm, washed in Form Wash V2 10+5 min in >=99% IPA, post-cured 70 °C for 12 min in Form Cure V2. Orientation not stated.

Every value links to the document that states it. "Not sourced" means no citable source states it (or only a specification minimum); figures computed from it are left out too.

FDM PAHT-CF and SLA Resin Tough 2000 are 3D printed: their properties depend on build direction and print settings; these are typical values.

Questions

Is FDM PAHT-CF stronger than SLA Resin Tough 2000?

FDM PAHT-CF is stronger: its tensile strength is 92 MPa against yield strength 40.4 MPa for SLA Resin Tough 2000 (2.28x).

Which is lighter, FDM PAHT-CF or SLA Resin Tough 2000?

FDM PAHT-CF is lighter: 1,060 kg/m³ against 1,090 kg/m³ for SLA Resin Tough 2000.

Which is stiffer, FDM PAHT-CF or SLA Resin Tough 2000?

FDM PAHT-CF is stiffer: Young's modulus 3.86 GPa against 1.8 GPa for SLA Resin Tough 2000, so the same part in FDM PAHT-CF deflects less under the same load.

Which is lighter for the same job, FDM PAHT-CF or SLA Resin Tough 2000?

For the same stiffness or strength: FDM PAHT-CF is lighter for a stiff rod or tie (tension), stiff beam (bending), stiff panel or plate, strong rod or tie, strong beam, strong panel or plate.

Part that must beFDM PAHT-CFSLA Resin Tough 2000
Stiff rod or tie (tension)lighter2.21x heavier
Stiff beam (bending)lighter1.51x heavier
Stiff panel or platelighter33% heavier
Strong rod or tielighter2.34x heavier
Strong beamlighter1.78x heavier
Strong panel or platelighter1.55x heavier

For the same stiffness or strength, mass scales with density over stiffness (or strength) raised to a power set by how the part is loaded: 1 for a rod in tension, 1/2 for a beam in bending, 1/3 for a panel (the standard material-selection indices).

Which is more ductile, FDM PAHT-CF or SLA Resin Tough 2000?

SLA Resin Tough 2000 stretches further before it breaks: 79% elongation at break against 8.4% for FDM PAHT-CF.

Which handles higher temperatures, FDM PAHT-CF or SLA Resin Tough 2000?

FDM PAHT-CF does: 170 °C against 57 °C for SLA Resin Tough 2000, both HDT 1.8 MPa.

Among 59 materials

1k10k0.1110100Density (kg/m³)Young's modulus (GPa)Plastic PLAPlastic PETGPlastic ABSPlastic TPUPlastic NylonAluminumSteelIronTitaniumSteel AISI 1018Stainless 304Stainless 316Aluminum 6061-T6Aluminum 7075-T6Brass C360Copper C110GlassSteel AISI 1045Steel AISI 4340Steel A992Stainless 303Stainless 17-4PHAluminum 2024-T351Aluminum 5052-H32Aluminum 7050-T7451Titanium Ti-6Al-4VBrass C260Nickel Inconel 718Magnesium AZ31B-H24Zinc Zamak 3Plastic ABS (bulk/injection)Plastic PolycarbonatePlastic POM/AcetalPlastic Nylon PA6Plastic Nylon PA66Plastic PEEKPlastic UHMWPEPlastic HDPEPlastic PolypropylenePlastic PMMAFDM ASAFDM PolycarbonateFDM HIPSSLS PA12 NylonDMLS AlSi10Mg AluminumDMLS Ti-6Al-4V ELI TitaniumDMLS 316L Stainless SteelDMLS 17-4PH Stainless SteelFDM PAHT-CFSLA Resin Tough 2000
Stiffness against density
1k10k101001kDensity (kg/m³)Yield strength (MPa)Plastic PLAPlastic PETGPlastic ABSPlastic TPUPlastic NylonRubberAluminumSteelIronTitaniumSteel AISI 1018Stainless 304Stainless 316Aluminum 6061-T6Aluminum 7075-T6Brass C360Copper C110GlassSteel AISI 1045Steel AISI 4340Steel A992Stainless 303Stainless 17-4PHAluminum 2024-T351Aluminum 5052-H32Aluminum 7050-T7451Titanium Ti-6Al-4VBrass C260Nickel Inconel 718Magnesium AZ31B-H24Zinc Zamak 3Plastic ABS (bulk/injection)Plastic PolycarbonatePlastic POM/AcetalPlastic Nylon PA6Plastic Nylon PA66Plastic PEEKPlastic PTFEPlastic UHMWPEPlastic HDPEPlastic PolypropylenePlastic PMMAFDM ASAFDM PolycarbonateFDM HIPSSLA Resin Elastic 50ASLS PA12 NylonDMLS AlSi10Mg AluminumDMLS Ti-6Al-4V ELI TitaniumDMLS 316L Stainless SteelDMLS 17-4PH Stainless SteelBrickFDM PAHT-CFSLA Resin Tough 2000
Strength against density

Related comparisons