Materials / Compare

Plastic ABS vs. Aluminum 5052-H32

Compare Plastic ABS vs. Aluminum 5052-H32 strength, stiffness, weight and thermal properties.

Change either side
Plastic ABS3D printed (FDM)
Aluminum 5052-H32Wrought
Try it on a partA bracket to run stress or thermal on, free in your browserOpen in LessCADOpen in LessCAD
Mechanical
Yield strength38.1MPasourcetypical195MPasourcetypical, 0.2% offset
Ultimate tensile strength38.1MPasourcetypical, peak stress (= stress at yield)230MPasourcetypical
Flexural strength61.1MPasourcetypicalnot sourced
Elongation at break4.6%sourcetypical12%sourcetypical2.61x more ductile
Young's modulus (stiffness)1.96GPasourcetypical70GPasourcetypical35.7x stiffer
Density1,100kg/m³sourcetypical2,685kg/m³sourcenominal
Strength to weight34.6kN·m/kg72.6kN·m/kg2.1x higher
Stiffness to weight1.78MN·m/kg26.1MN·m/kg14.6x higher
Poisson's ratio0.39sourcebase material: ABS family typical (Covestro Part and Mold Design guide, Table 3-1)0.33sourcetypical (handbook physical constant)
Shear modulus0.706GPa26.3GPa37.3x stiffer in shear
Bulk modulus2.97GPa68.6GPa
Speed of sound1,336m/s5,106m/s
Thermal
Thermal conductivity0.17W/m·Ksourcebase material: INEOS Styrolution Terluran GP-22 injection-molding ABS, typical138W/m·Ksourcebase material: 5052 in O temper (same alloy, annealed); Kaiser typical
Thermal expansion80–110µm/m·Ksourcebase material: INEOS Styrolution Terluran GP-22 injection-molding ABS, range23.8µm/m·Ksourcetypical, mean 20-100 °C
100 mm part over a 50 °C swing475µm growth119µm growth3.99x less
Specific heatnot sourced963J/kg·Ksourceat 100 °C (212 °F); table covers O, H32, H34, H36, H38
Heats up and cools (diffusivity)not sourced53.4mm²/s
Thermal shock resistance21.2W/m10,822W/m511x more resistant
Melting pointnot sourced605–650°Csourcemelting range
Glass transition101°Csourcetypicalnot sourced
Max service temperature86.6°CsourceHDT 0.455 MPa (printed specimens)not sourced
Values forUltimaker ABS, 3D-printed specimens, XY (flat); Ultimaker S5 Pro, engineering intent profile, 0.15 mm layer height, AA 0.4 print core, 100% infill, Cura 4.9, printed one-at-a-time, conditioned >=24 h at room temperature. TDS v5.00, April 20, 2022.5052-H32, Kaiser Aluminum tube & pipe typical datasheet (mechanical, CTE, melting); MIL-HDBK-5J (Poisson, density, specific heat)

Every value links to the document that states it. "Not sourced" means no citable source states it (or only a specification minimum); figures computed from it are left out too.

Plastic ABS is 3D printed: its properties depend on build direction and print settings; these are typical values.

Questions

Is Plastic ABS stronger than Aluminum 5052-H32?

Aluminum 5052-H32 is stronger: its yield strength is 195 MPa against 38.1 MPa for Plastic ABS (5.12x).

Which is lighter, Plastic ABS or Aluminum 5052-H32?

Plastic ABS is lighter: 1,100 kg/m³ against 2,685 kg/m³ for Aluminum 5052-H32.

Which is stiffer, Plastic ABS or Aluminum 5052-H32?

Aluminum 5052-H32 is stiffer: Young's modulus 70 GPa against 1.96 GPa for Plastic ABS, so the same part in Aluminum 5052-H32 deflects less under the same load.

Which is lighter for the same job, Plastic ABS or Aluminum 5052-H32?

For the same stiffness or strength: Plastic ABS is lighter for a strong panel or plate; Aluminum 5052-H32 is lighter for a stiff rod or tie (tension), stiff beam (bending), stiff panel or plate, strong rod or tie, strong beam.

Part that must bePlastic ABSAluminum 5052-H32
Stiff rod or tie (tension)14.6x heavierlighter
Stiff beam (bending)2.45x heavierlighter
Stiff panel or plate35% heavierlighter
Strong rod or tie2.1x heavierlighter
Strong beam22% heavierlighter
Strong panel or platelighter8% heavier

For the same stiffness or strength, mass scales with density over stiffness (or strength) raised to a power set by how the part is loaded: 1 for a rod in tension, 1/2 for a beam in bending, 1/3 for a panel (the standard material-selection indices).

Which is more ductile, Plastic ABS or Aluminum 5052-H32?

Aluminum 5052-H32 stretches further before it breaks: 12% elongation at break against 4.6% for Plastic ABS.

Which conducts heat better, Plastic ABS or Aluminum 5052-H32?

Aluminum 5052-H32 conducts heat better: 138 W/m·K against 0.17 W/m·K for Plastic ABS.

Which expands less with temperature?

Aluminum 5052-H32 expands less: 23.8 µm/m·K against 95 µm/m·K for Plastic ABS.

Among 59 materials

1k10k0.1110100Density (kg/m³)Young's modulus (GPa)Plastic PLAPlastic PETGPlastic TPUPlastic NylonAluminumSteelIronTitaniumSteel AISI 1018Stainless 304Stainless 316Aluminum 6061-T6Aluminum 7075-T6Brass C360Copper C110GlassSteel AISI 1045Steel AISI 4340Steel A992Stainless 303Stainless 17-4PHAluminum 2024-T351Aluminum 7050-T7451Titanium Ti-6Al-4VBrass C260Nickel Inconel 718Magnesium AZ31B-H24Zinc Zamak 3Plastic ABS (bulk/injection)Plastic PolycarbonatePlastic POM/AcetalPlastic Nylon PA6Plastic Nylon PA66Plastic PEEKPlastic UHMWPEPlastic HDPEPlastic PolypropylenePlastic PMMAFDM ASAFDM PolycarbonateFDM PAHT-CFFDM HIPSSLA Resin Tough 2000SLS PA12 NylonDMLS AlSi10Mg AluminumDMLS Ti-6Al-4V ELI TitaniumDMLS 316L Stainless SteelDMLS 17-4PH Stainless SteelPlastic ABSAluminum 5052-H32
Stiffness against density
1k10k101001kDensity (kg/m³)Yield strength (MPa)Plastic PLAPlastic PETGPlastic TPUPlastic NylonRubberAluminumSteelIronTitaniumSteel AISI 1018Stainless 304Stainless 316Aluminum 6061-T6Aluminum 7075-T6Brass C360Copper C110GlassSteel AISI 1045Steel AISI 4340Steel A992Stainless 303Stainless 17-4PHAluminum 2024-T351Aluminum 7050-T7451Titanium Ti-6Al-4VBrass C260Nickel Inconel 718Magnesium AZ31B-H24Zinc Zamak 3Plastic ABS (bulk/injection)Plastic PolycarbonatePlastic POM/AcetalPlastic Nylon PA6Plastic Nylon PA66Plastic PEEKPlastic PTFEPlastic UHMWPEPlastic HDPEPlastic PolypropylenePlastic PMMAFDM ASAFDM PolycarbonateFDM PAHT-CFFDM HIPSSLA Resin Tough 2000SLA Resin Elastic 50ASLS PA12 NylonDMLS AlSi10Mg AluminumDMLS Ti-6Al-4V ELI TitaniumDMLS 316L Stainless SteelDMLS 17-4PH Stainless SteelBrickPlastic ABSAluminum 5052-H32
Strength against density

Related comparisons