Materials / Compare

Aluminum 2024-T351 vs. Aluminum 7075-T6

Compare Aluminum 2024-T351 vs. Aluminum 7075-T6 strength, stiffness, weight and thermal properties.

Change either side
Aluminum 2024-T351Wrought
Aluminum 7075-T6Wrought
Try it on a partA bracket to run stress or thermal on, free in your browserOpen in LessCADOpen in LessCAD
Mechanical
Yield strength324MPasourcetypical, 0.2% offset, .500 in dia specimen503MPasourcetypical, 0.2% offset, .500 in dia specimen1.55x stronger
Ultimate tensile strength469MPasourcetypical572MPasourcetypical22% stronger
Elongation at break19%sourcetypical, in 4D1.73x more ductile11%sourcetypical, in 4D
Young's modulus (stiffness)73.1GPasourcetypical71GPasourcetypical
Density2,770kg/m³sourcenominal2,800kg/m³sourcenominal
Strength to weight117kN·m/kg180kN·m/kg1.54x higher
Stiffness to weight26.4MN·m/kg4% higher25.4MN·m/kg
Poisson's ratio0.33sourcetypical (handbook physical constant), all tempers0.33sourcetypical (handbook physical constant)
Shear modulus27.5GPa3% stiffer in shear26.7GPa
Bulk modulus71.7GPa69.6GPa
Speed of sound5,137m/s5,036m/s
Thermal
Thermal conductivity120W/m·Ksourcetypical, 20 °C130W/m·Ksourcetypical, 20 °C, T651
Thermal expansion22.9µm/m·Ksourcetypical, mean 20-100 °C23.4µm/m·Ksourcetypical, mean 20-100 °C
100 mm part over a 50 °C swing115µm growth2% less117µm growth
Specific heat875J/kg·Ksourcetypical, at 100 °C960J/kg·Ksourcetypical, at 100 °C
Heats up and cools (diffusivity)49.5mm²/s2% faster48.4mm²/s
Thermal shock resistance15,561W/m26,370W/m1.69x more resistant
Melting point502–638°Csourcemelting range532–635°Csourcemelting range
Values for2024-T4/T351, Kaiser Aluminum sheet, coil & plate typical datasheet; Poisson from MIL-HDBK-5J7075-T6/T651, Kaiser Aluminum rod & bar (mechanical) and sheet/coil/plate (physical) typical datasheets; Poisson from MIL-HDBK-5J

Every value links to the document that states it. "Not sourced" means no citable source states it (or only a specification minimum); figures computed from it are left out too.

Questions

Is Aluminum 2024-T351 stronger than Aluminum 7075-T6?

Aluminum 7075-T6 is stronger: its yield strength is 503 MPa against 324 MPa for Aluminum 2024-T351 (1.55x).

Which is lighter, Aluminum 2024-T351 or Aluminum 7075-T6?

Aluminum 2024-T351 is lighter: 2,770 kg/m³ against 2,800 kg/m³ for Aluminum 7075-T6.

Which is stiffer, Aluminum 2024-T351 or Aluminum 7075-T6?

Aluminum 2024-T351 is stiffer: Young's modulus 73.1 GPa against 71 GPa for Aluminum 7075-T6, so the same part in Aluminum 2024-T351 deflects less under the same load.

Which is lighter for the same job, Aluminum 2024-T351 or Aluminum 7075-T6?

For the same stiffness or strength: Aluminum 2024-T351 is lighter for a stiff rod or tie (tension), stiff beam (bending), stiff panel or plate; Aluminum 7075-T6 is lighter for a strong rod or tie, strong beam, strong panel or plate.

Part that must beAluminum 2024-T351Aluminum 7075-T6
Stiff rod or tie (tension)lighter4% heavier
Stiff beam (bending)lighter3% heavier
Stiff panel or platelighter2% heavier
Strong rod or tie1.54x heavierlighter
Strong beam33% heavierlighter
Strong panel or plate23% heavierlighter

For the same stiffness or strength, mass scales with density over stiffness (or strength) raised to a power set by how the part is loaded: 1 for a rod in tension, 1/2 for a beam in bending, 1/3 for a panel (the standard material-selection indices).

Which is more ductile, Aluminum 2024-T351 or Aluminum 7075-T6?

Aluminum 2024-T351 stretches further before it breaks: 19% elongation at break against 11% for Aluminum 7075-T6.

Which conducts heat better, Aluminum 2024-T351 or Aluminum 7075-T6?

Aluminum 7075-T6 conducts heat better: 130 W/m·K against 120 W/m·K for Aluminum 2024-T351.

Which expands less with temperature?

Aluminum 2024-T351 expands less: 22.9 µm/m·K against 23.4 µm/m·K for Aluminum 7075-T6.

Among 59 materials

1k10k0.1110100Density (kg/m³)Young's modulus (GPa)Plastic PLAPlastic PETGPlastic ABSPlastic TPUPlastic NylonAluminumSteelIronTitaniumSteel AISI 1018Stainless 304Stainless 316Aluminum 6061-T6Brass C360Copper C110GlassSteel AISI 1045Steel AISI 4340Steel A992Stainless 303Stainless 17-4PHAluminum 5052-H32Aluminum 7050-T7451Titanium Ti-6Al-4VBrass C260Nickel Inconel 718Magnesium AZ31B-H24Zinc Zamak 3Plastic ABS (bulk/injection)Plastic PolycarbonatePlastic POM/AcetalPlastic Nylon PA6Plastic Nylon PA66Plastic PEEKPlastic UHMWPEPlastic HDPEPlastic PolypropylenePlastic PMMAFDM ASAFDM PolycarbonateFDM PAHT-CFFDM HIPSSLA Resin Tough 2000SLS PA12 NylonDMLS AlSi10Mg AluminumDMLS Ti-6Al-4V ELI TitaniumDMLS 316L Stainless SteelDMLS 17-4PH Stainless SteelAluminum 2024-T351Aluminum 7075-T6
Stiffness against density
1k10k101001kDensity (kg/m³)Yield strength (MPa)Plastic PLAPlastic PETGPlastic ABSPlastic TPUPlastic NylonRubberAluminumSteelIronTitaniumSteel AISI 1018Stainless 304Stainless 316Aluminum 6061-T6Brass C360Copper C110GlassSteel AISI 1045Steel AISI 4340Steel A992Stainless 303Stainless 17-4PHAluminum 5052-H32Aluminum 7050-T7451Titanium Ti-6Al-4VBrass C260Nickel Inconel 718Magnesium AZ31B-H24Zinc Zamak 3Plastic ABS (bulk/injection)Plastic PolycarbonatePlastic POM/AcetalPlastic Nylon PA6Plastic Nylon PA66Plastic PEEKPlastic PTFEPlastic UHMWPEPlastic HDPEPlastic PolypropylenePlastic PMMAFDM ASAFDM PolycarbonateFDM PAHT-CFFDM HIPSSLA Resin Tough 2000SLA Resin Elastic 50ASLS PA12 NylonDMLS AlSi10Mg AluminumDMLS Ti-6Al-4V ELI TitaniumDMLS 316L Stainless SteelDMLS 17-4PH Stainless SteelBrickAluminum 2024-T351Aluminum 7075-T6
Strength against density

Related comparisons