Materials / Compare
Aluminum 2024-T351 vs. Stainless 303
Compare Aluminum 2024-T351 vs. Stainless 303 strength, stiffness, weight and thermal properties.
| Try it on a partA bracket to run stress or thermal on, free in your browser | Open in LessCAD | Open in LessCAD |
|---|---|---|
| Mechanical | ||
| Yield strength | 324MPasourcetypical, 0.2% offset, .500 in dia specimen | 275MPasourceOutokumpu typical (product P = hot rolled plate, transverse) |
| Ultimate tensile strength | 469MPasourcetypical | 585MPasourceOutokumpu typical |
| Elongation at break | 19%sourcetypical, in 4D | 35%sourceOutokumpu typical, A5 |
| Young's modulus (stiffness) | 73.1GPasourcetypical | 200GPasourceat RT (Table 12) |
| Density | 2,770kg/m³sourcenominal | 7,900kg/m³sourceat RT |
| Strength to weight | 117kN·m/kg3.36x higher | 34.8kN·m/kg |
| Stiffness to weight | 26.4MN·m/kg4% higher | 25.3MN·m/kg |
| Poisson's ratio | 0.33sourcetypical (handbook physical constant), all tempers | 0.3sourcedesign value (structural stainless steels) |
| Shear modulus | 27.5GPa | 76.9GPa2.8x stiffer in shear |
| Bulk modulus | 71.7GPa | 167GPa |
| Speed of sound | 5,137m/s | 5,032m/s |
| Thermal | ||
| Thermal conductivity | 120W/m·Ksourcetypical, 20 °C | 15W/m·Ksourceat RT |
| Thermal expansion | 22.9µm/m·Ksourcetypical, mean 20-100 °C | 16µm/m·Ksourcemean, 20–100 °C |
| 100 mm part over a 50 °C swing | 115µm growth | 80µm growth43% less |
| Specific heat | 875J/kg·Ksourcetypical, at 100 °C | 500J/kg·Ksourceat RT |
| Heats up and cools (diffusivity) | 49.5mm²/s13x faster | 3.8mm²/s |
| Thermal shock resistance | 15,561W/m17.2x more resistant | 902W/m |
| Melting point | 502–638°Csourcemelting range | not sourced |
| Max service temperature | not sourced | 871°Csourcecontinuous, scaling limit |
| Values for | 2024-T4/T351, Kaiser Aluminum sheet, coil & plate typical datasheet; Poisson from MIL-HDBK-5J | 1.4305 / UNS S30300, Outokumpu typical values (hot rolled, solution annealed) from 'Steel Grades, Properties and Global Standards'; max service from Carpenter CarTech 303 datasheet |
Every value links to the document that states it. "Not sourced" means no citable source states it (or only a specification minimum); figures computed from it are left out too.
Questions
Is Aluminum 2024-T351 stronger than Stainless 303?
Aluminum 2024-T351 is stronger: its yield strength is 324 MPa against 275 MPa for Stainless 303 (18%).
Which is lighter, Aluminum 2024-T351 or Stainless 303?
Aluminum 2024-T351 is lighter: 2,770 kg/m³ against 7,900 kg/m³ for Stainless 303.
Which is stiffer, Aluminum 2024-T351 or Stainless 303?
Stainless 303 is stiffer: Young's modulus 200 GPa against 73.1 GPa for Aluminum 2024-T351, so the same part in Stainless 303 deflects less under the same load.
Which is lighter for the same job, Aluminum 2024-T351 or Stainless 303?
For the same stiffness or strength: Aluminum 2024-T351 is lighter for a stiff rod or tie (tension), stiff beam (bending), stiff panel or plate, strong rod or tie, strong beam, strong panel or plate.
| Part that must be | Aluminum 2024-T351 | Stainless 303 |
|---|---|---|
| Stiff rod or tie (tension) | lighter | 4% heavier |
| Stiff beam (bending) | lighter | 1.72x heavier |
| Stiff panel or plate | lighter | 2.04x heavier |
| Strong rod or tie | lighter | 3.36x heavier |
| Strong beam | lighter | 3.18x heavier |
| Strong panel or plate | lighter | 3.1x heavier |
For the same stiffness or strength, mass scales with density over stiffness (or strength) raised to a power set by how the part is loaded: 1 for a rod in tension, 1/2 for a beam in bending, 1/3 for a panel (the standard material-selection indices).
Which conducts heat better, Aluminum 2024-T351 or Stainless 303?
Aluminum 2024-T351 conducts heat better: 120 W/m·K against 15 W/m·K for Stainless 303.
Which expands less with temperature?
Stainless 303 expands less: 16 µm/m·K against 22.9 µm/m·K for Aluminum 2024-T351.