Materials / Compare

Stainless 303 vs. Steel AISI 1018

Compare Stainless 303 vs. Steel AISI 1018 strength, stiffness, weight and thermal properties.

Change either side
Stainless 303Wrought
Steel AISI 1018Wrought
Try it on a partA bracket to run stress or thermal on, free in your browserOpen in LessCADOpen in LessCAD
Mechanical
Yield strength275MPasourceOutokumpu typical (product P = hot rolled plate, transverse)372MPasourceproducer-stated, cold drawn
Ultimate tensile strength585MPasourceOutokumpu typical441MPasourceproducer-stated, cold drawn
Elongation at break35%sourceOutokumpu typical, A515%sourcein 2 in (50.8 mm)
Young's modulus (stiffness)200GPasourceat RT (Table 12)200GPasourcebase material: AISI 1025 plain carbon steel (MIL-HDBK-5J design value; ASTM A108 bar is the cold-finished carbon-steel bar spec that also covers 1018)
Density7,900kg/m³sourceat RT7,861kg/m³sourcebase material: AISI 1025 plain carbon steel (MIL-HDBK-5J design value; ASTM A108 bar is the cold-finished carbon-steel bar spec that also covers 1018)
Strength to weight34.8kN·m/kg47.3kN·m/kg36% higher
Stiffness to weight25.3MN·m/kg25.4MN·m/kg
Poisson's ratio0.3sourcedesign value (structural stainless steels)0.32sourcebase material: AISI 1025 plain carbon steel (MIL-HDBK-5J design value; ASTM A108 bar is the cold-finished carbon-steel bar spec that also covers 1018)
Shear modulus76.9GPa2% stiffer in shear75.7GPa
Bulk modulus167GPa185GPa
Speed of sound5,032m/s5,043m/s
Thermal
Thermal conductivity15W/m·Ksourceat RT51.9W/m·Ksourcebase material: AISI 1025 plain carbon steel (MIL-HDBK-5J design value; ASTM A108 bar is the cold-finished carbon-steel bar spec that also covers 1018)
Thermal expansion16µm/m·Ksourcemean, 20–100 °C12µm/m·Ksourcebase material: unalloyed carbon steel, Ovako family table (S275JR, 'none alloyed structural steels', C <= 0.21%); mean 20-300 °C
100 mm part over a 50 °C swing80µm growth60µm growth33% less
Specific heat500J/kg·Ksourceat RT486J/kg·Ksourcebase material: AISI 1025 plain carbon steel (MIL-HDBK-5J design value; ASTM A108 bar is the cold-finished carbon-steel bar spec that also covers 1018)
Heats up and cools (diffusivity)3.8mm²/s13.6mm²/s3.58x faster
Thermal shock resistance902W/m5,473W/m6.07x more resistant
Max service temperature871°Csourcecontinuous, scaling limitnot sourced
Values for1.4305 / UNS S30300, Outokumpu typical values (hot rolled, solution annealed) from 'Steel Grades, Properties and Global Standards'; max service from Carpenter CarTech 303 datasheetAISI 1018 cold drawn bar (Niagara LaSalle, cold-finished bar producer)

Every value links to the document that states it. "Not sourced" means no citable source states it (or only a specification minimum); figures computed from it are left out too.

Questions

Is Stainless 303 stronger than Steel AISI 1018?

Steel AISI 1018 is stronger: its yield strength is 372 MPa against 275 MPa for Stainless 303 (35%).

Which is lighter, Stainless 303 or Steel AISI 1018?

Steel AISI 1018 is lighter: 7,861 kg/m³ against 7,900 kg/m³ for Stainless 303.

Which is stiffer, Stainless 303 or Steel AISI 1018?

Stainless 303 is stiffer: Young's modulus 200 GPa against 200 GPa for Steel AISI 1018, so the same part in Stainless 303 deflects less under the same load.

Which is lighter for the same job, Stainless 303 or Steel AISI 1018?

For the same stiffness or strength: Steel AISI 1018 is lighter for a strong rod or tie, strong beam, strong panel or plate.

Part that must beStainless 303Steel AISI 1018
Stiff rod or tie (tension)about equalabout equal
Stiff beam (bending)about equalabout equal
Stiff panel or plateabout equalabout equal
Strong rod or tie36% heavierlighter
Strong beam23% heavierlighter
Strong panel or plate17% heavierlighter

For the same stiffness or strength, mass scales with density over stiffness (or strength) raised to a power set by how the part is loaded: 1 for a rod in tension, 1/2 for a beam in bending, 1/3 for a panel (the standard material-selection indices).

Which conducts heat better, Stainless 303 or Steel AISI 1018?

Steel AISI 1018 conducts heat better: 51.9 W/m·K against 15 W/m·K for Stainless 303.

Which expands less with temperature?

Steel AISI 1018 expands less: 12 µm/m·K against 16 µm/m·K for Stainless 303.

Among 59 materials

1k10k0.1110100Density (kg/m³)Young's modulus (GPa)Plastic PLAPlastic PETGPlastic ABSPlastic TPUPlastic NylonAluminumSteelIronTitaniumStainless 304Stainless 316Aluminum 6061-T6Aluminum 7075-T6Brass C360Copper C110GlassSteel AISI 1045Steel AISI 4340Steel A992Stainless 17-4PHAluminum 2024-T351Aluminum 5052-H32Aluminum 7050-T7451Titanium Ti-6Al-4VBrass C260Nickel Inconel 718Magnesium AZ31B-H24Zinc Zamak 3Plastic ABS (bulk/injection)Plastic PolycarbonatePlastic POM/AcetalPlastic Nylon PA6Plastic Nylon PA66Plastic PEEKPlastic UHMWPEPlastic HDPEPlastic PolypropylenePlastic PMMAFDM ASAFDM PolycarbonateFDM PAHT-CFFDM HIPSSLA Resin Tough 2000SLS PA12 NylonDMLS AlSi10Mg AluminumDMLS Ti-6Al-4V ELI TitaniumDMLS 316L Stainless SteelDMLS 17-4PH Stainless SteelStainless 303Steel AISI 1018
Stiffness against density
1k10k101001kDensity (kg/m³)Yield strength (MPa)Plastic PLAPlastic PETGPlastic ABSPlastic TPUPlastic NylonRubberAluminumSteelIronTitaniumStainless 304Stainless 316Aluminum 6061-T6Aluminum 7075-T6Brass C360Copper C110GlassSteel AISI 1045Steel AISI 4340Steel A992Stainless 17-4PHAluminum 2024-T351Aluminum 5052-H32Aluminum 7050-T7451Titanium Ti-6Al-4VBrass C260Nickel Inconel 718Magnesium AZ31B-H24Zinc Zamak 3Plastic ABS (bulk/injection)Plastic PolycarbonatePlastic POM/AcetalPlastic Nylon PA6Plastic Nylon PA66Plastic PEEKPlastic PTFEPlastic UHMWPEPlastic HDPEPlastic PolypropylenePlastic PMMAFDM ASAFDM PolycarbonateFDM PAHT-CFFDM HIPSSLA Resin Tough 2000SLA Resin Elastic 50ASLS PA12 NylonDMLS AlSi10Mg AluminumDMLS Ti-6Al-4V ELI TitaniumDMLS 316L Stainless SteelDMLS 17-4PH Stainless SteelBrickStainless 303Steel AISI 1018
Strength against density

Related comparisons