Materials / Compare

Stainless 316 vs. Steel AISI 1018

Compare Stainless 316 vs. Steel AISI 1018 strength, stiffness, weight and thermal properties.

Change either side
Stainless 316Wrought
Steel AISI 1018Wrought
Try it on a partA bracket to run stress or thermal on, free in your browserOpen in LessCADOpen in LessCAD
Mechanical
Yield strength265MPasourcetypical (representative), annealed 1.0 mm sheet372MPasourceproducer-stated, cold drawn
Ultimate tensile strength583MPasourcetypical (representative), annealed 1.0 mm sheet441MPasourceproducer-stated, cold drawn
Elongation at break61%sourcetypical (representative), annealed, in 2 in. (51 mm)15%sourcein 2 in (50.8 mm)
Young's modulus (stiffness)200GPasourcetypical, in tension200GPasourcebase material: AISI 1025 plain carbon steel (MIL-HDBK-5J design value; ASTM A108 bar is the cold-finished carbon-steel bar spec that also covers 1018)
Density8,027kg/m³sourcetypical7,861kg/m³sourcebase material: AISI 1025 plain carbon steel (MIL-HDBK-5J design value; ASTM A108 bar is the cold-finished carbon-steel bar spec that also covers 1018)
Strength to weight33kN·m/kg47.3kN·m/kg43% higher
Stiffness to weight24.9MN·m/kg25.4MN·m/kg2% higher
Poisson's ratio0.3sourcedesign value (structural stainless steels)0.32sourcebase material: AISI 1025 plain carbon steel (MIL-HDBK-5J design value; ASTM A108 bar is the cold-finished carbon-steel bar spec that also covers 1018)
Shear modulus76.9GPa2% stiffer in shear75.7GPa
Bulk modulus167GPa185GPa
Speed of sound4,992m/s5,043m/s
Thermal
Thermal conductivity14.6W/m·Ksource20–100 °C51.9W/m·Ksourcebase material: AISI 1025 plain carbon steel (MIL-HDBK-5J design value; ASTM A108 bar is the cold-finished carbon-steel bar spec that also covers 1018)
Thermal expansion16.5µm/m·Ksourcemean, 20–100 °C12µm/m·Ksourcebase material: unalloyed carbon steel, Ovako family table (S275JR, 'none alloyed structural steels', C <= 0.21%); mean 20-300 °C
100 mm part over a 50 °C swing82.5µm growth60µm growth37% less
Specific heat450J/kg·Ksourceat 20 °C486J/kg·Ksourcebase material: AISI 1025 plain carbon steel (MIL-HDBK-5J design value; ASTM A108 bar is the cold-finished carbon-steel bar spec that also covers 1018)
Heats up and cools (diffusivity)4.04mm²/s13.6mm²/s3.36x faster
Thermal shock resistance821W/m5,473W/m6.67x more resistant
Melting point1,390–1,440°Csourcemelting rangenot sourced
Max service temperature871–899°Csourceoxidation (scaling) limit in airnot sourced
Values forATI 316 (UNS S31600), annealed 1.0 mm sheet, ATI technical data sheet (2012); Poisson's ratio from the Nickel Institute/SCI structural stainless design manualAISI 1018 cold drawn bar (Niagara LaSalle, cold-finished bar producer)

Every value links to the document that states it. "Not sourced" means no citable source states it (or only a specification minimum); figures computed from it are left out too.

Questions

Is Stainless 316 stronger than Steel AISI 1018?

Steel AISI 1018 is stronger: its yield strength is 372 MPa against 265 MPa for Stainless 316 (40%).

Which is lighter, Stainless 316 or Steel AISI 1018?

Steel AISI 1018 is lighter: 7,861 kg/m³ against 8,027 kg/m³ for Stainless 316.

Which is stiffer, Stainless 316 or Steel AISI 1018?

Stainless 316 is stiffer: Young's modulus 200 GPa against 200 GPa for Steel AISI 1018, so the same part in Stainless 316 deflects less under the same load.

Which is lighter for the same job, Stainless 316 or Steel AISI 1018?

For the same stiffness or strength: Steel AISI 1018 is lighter for a stiff rod or tie (tension), stiff beam (bending), stiff panel or plate, strong rod or tie, strong beam, strong panel or plate.

Part that must beStainless 316Steel AISI 1018
Stiff rod or tie (tension)2% heavierlighter
Stiff beam (bending)2% heavierlighter
Stiff panel or plate2% heavierlighter
Strong rod or tie43% heavierlighter
Strong beam28% heavierlighter
Strong panel or plate21% heavierlighter

For the same stiffness or strength, mass scales with density over stiffness (or strength) raised to a power set by how the part is loaded: 1 for a rod in tension, 1/2 for a beam in bending, 1/3 for a panel (the standard material-selection indices).

Which conducts heat better, Stainless 316 or Steel AISI 1018?

Steel AISI 1018 conducts heat better: 51.9 W/m·K against 14.6 W/m·K for Stainless 316.

Which expands less with temperature?

Steel AISI 1018 expands less: 12 µm/m·K against 16.5 µm/m·K for Stainless 316.

Among 59 materials

1k10k0.1110100Density (kg/m³)Young's modulus (GPa)Plastic PLAPlastic PETGPlastic ABSPlastic TPUPlastic NylonAluminumSteelIronTitaniumStainless 304Aluminum 6061-T6Aluminum 7075-T6Brass C360Copper C110GlassSteel AISI 1045Steel AISI 4340Steel A992Stainless 303Stainless 17-4PHAluminum 2024-T351Aluminum 5052-H32Aluminum 7050-T7451Titanium Ti-6Al-4VBrass C260Nickel Inconel 718Magnesium AZ31B-H24Zinc Zamak 3Plastic ABS (bulk/injection)Plastic PolycarbonatePlastic POM/AcetalPlastic Nylon PA6Plastic Nylon PA66Plastic PEEKPlastic UHMWPEPlastic HDPEPlastic PolypropylenePlastic PMMAFDM ASAFDM PolycarbonateFDM PAHT-CFFDM HIPSSLA Resin Tough 2000SLS PA12 NylonDMLS AlSi10Mg AluminumDMLS Ti-6Al-4V ELI TitaniumDMLS 316L Stainless SteelDMLS 17-4PH Stainless SteelStainless 316Steel AISI 1018
Stiffness against density
1k10k101001kDensity (kg/m³)Yield strength (MPa)Plastic PLAPlastic PETGPlastic ABSPlastic TPUPlastic NylonRubberAluminumSteelIronTitaniumStainless 304Aluminum 6061-T6Aluminum 7075-T6Brass C360Copper C110GlassSteel AISI 1045Steel AISI 4340Steel A992Stainless 303Stainless 17-4PHAluminum 2024-T351Aluminum 5052-H32Aluminum 7050-T7451Titanium Ti-6Al-4VBrass C260Nickel Inconel 718Magnesium AZ31B-H24Zinc Zamak 3Plastic ABS (bulk/injection)Plastic PolycarbonatePlastic POM/AcetalPlastic Nylon PA6Plastic Nylon PA66Plastic PEEKPlastic PTFEPlastic UHMWPEPlastic HDPEPlastic PolypropylenePlastic PMMAFDM ASAFDM PolycarbonateFDM PAHT-CFFDM HIPSSLA Resin Tough 2000SLA Resin Elastic 50ASLS PA12 NylonDMLS AlSi10Mg AluminumDMLS Ti-6Al-4V ELI TitaniumDMLS 316L Stainless SteelDMLS 17-4PH Stainless SteelBrickStainless 316Steel AISI 1018
Strength against density

Related comparisons