Materials / Compare
Aluminum 5052-H32 vs. Steel AISI 1045
Compare Aluminum 5052-H32 vs. Steel AISI 1045 strength, stiffness, weight and thermal properties.
| Try it on a partA bracket to run stress or thermal on, free in your browser | Open in LessCAD | Open in LessCAD |
|---|---|---|
| Mechanical | ||
| Yield strength | 195MPasourcetypical, 0.2% offset | 531MPasourceproducer-stated, cold drawn |
| Ultimate tensile strength | 230MPasourcetypical | 627MPasourceproducer-stated, cold drawn |
| Elongation at break | 12%sourcetypical | 12%sourcein 2 in (50.8 mm) |
| Young's modulus (stiffness) | 70GPasourcetypical | 210GPasourcetypical3x stiffer |
| Density | 2,685kg/m³sourcenominal | 7,800kg/m³sourcetypical |
| Strength to weight | 72.6kN·m/kg7% higher | 68.1kN·m/kg |
| Stiffness to weight | 26.1MN·m/kg | 26.9MN·m/kg3% higher |
| Poisson's ratio | 0.33sourcetypical (handbook physical constant) | 0.3sourcetypical |
| Shear modulus | 26.3GPa | 80.8GPa3.07x stiffer in shear |
| Bulk modulus | 68.6GPa | 175GPa |
| Speed of sound | 5,106m/s | 5,189m/s |
| Thermal | ||
| Thermal conductivity | 138W/m·Ksourcebase material: 5052 in O temper (same alloy, annealed); Kaiser typical | 40–45W/m·Ksourcetypical range, ambient |
| Thermal expansion | 23.8µm/m·Ksourcetypical, mean 20-100 °C | 12µm/m·Ksourcetypical, mean 20-300 °C |
| 100 mm part over a 50 °C swing | 119µm growth | 60µm growth1.98x less |
| Specific heat | 963J/kg·Ksourceat 100 °C (212 °F); table covers O, H32, H34, H36, H38 | 460–480J/kg·Ksourcetypical range, 50/100 °C |
| Heats up and cools (diffusivity) | 53.4mm²/s4.6x faster | 11.6mm²/s |
| Thermal shock resistance | 10,822W/m1.73x more resistant | 6,269W/m |
| Melting point | 605–650°Csourcemelting range | not sourced |
| Values for | 5052-H32, Kaiser Aluminum tube & pipe typical datasheet (mechanical, CTE, melting); MIL-HDBK-5J (Poisson, density, specific heat) | AISI 1045 cold drawn bar (Niagara LaSalle) for mechanical; Ovako C45 (lists 'SAE 1045' as a similar designation) for physical constants |
Every value links to the document that states it. "Not sourced" means no citable source states it (or only a specification minimum); figures computed from it are left out too.
Questions
Is Aluminum 5052-H32 stronger than Steel AISI 1045?
Steel AISI 1045 is stronger: its yield strength is 531 MPa against 195 MPa for Aluminum 5052-H32 (2.72x).
Which is lighter, Aluminum 5052-H32 or Steel AISI 1045?
Aluminum 5052-H32 is lighter: 2,685 kg/m³ against 7,800 kg/m³ for Steel AISI 1045.
Which is stiffer, Aluminum 5052-H32 or Steel AISI 1045?
Steel AISI 1045 is stiffer: Young's modulus 210 GPa against 70 GPa for Aluminum 5052-H32, so the same part in Steel AISI 1045 deflects less under the same load.
Which is lighter for the same job, Aluminum 5052-H32 or Steel AISI 1045?
For the same stiffness or strength: Aluminum 5052-H32 is lighter for a stiff beam (bending), stiff panel or plate, strong rod or tie, strong beam, strong panel or plate; Steel AISI 1045 is lighter for a stiff rod or tie (tension).
| Part that must be | Aluminum 5052-H32 | Steel AISI 1045 |
|---|---|---|
| Stiff rod or tie (tension) | 3% heavier | lighter |
| Stiff beam (bending) | lighter | 1.68x heavier |
| Stiff panel or plate | lighter | 2.01x heavier |
| Strong rod or tie | lighter | 7% heavier |
| Strong beam | lighter | 49% heavier |
| Strong panel or plate | lighter | 1.76x heavier |
For the same stiffness or strength, mass scales with density over stiffness (or strength) raised to a power set by how the part is loaded: 1 for a rod in tension, 1/2 for a beam in bending, 1/3 for a panel (the standard material-selection indices).
Which conducts heat better, Aluminum 5052-H32 or Steel AISI 1045?
Aluminum 5052-H32 conducts heat better: 138 W/m·K against 42.5 W/m·K for Steel AISI 1045.
Which expands less with temperature?
Steel AISI 1045 expands less: 12 µm/m·K against 23.8 µm/m·K for Aluminum 5052-H32.