Materials / Compare
DMLS AlSi10Mg Aluminum vs. Plastic POM/Acetal
Compare DMLS AlSi10Mg Aluminum vs. Plastic POM/Acetal strength, stiffness, weight and thermal properties.
| Try it on a partA bracket to run stress or thermal on, free in your browser | Open in LessCAD | Open in LessCAD |
|---|---|---|
| Mechanical | ||
| Yield strength | 270MPasourcetypical, as manufactured, horizontal | 69MPasourcetypical (single ASTM D638 tensile strength) |
| Ultimate tensile strength | 450MPasourcetypical, as manufactured, horizontal | 69MPasourcetypical |
| Compressive strength | not sourced | 124MPasourcecompressive stress at 10% deformation |
| Flexural strength | not sourced | 99MPasourceflexural yield strength, typical |
| Elongation at break | 10.2%sourcetypical at break, as manufactured, horizontal | 75%sourcetypical |
| Young's modulus (stiffness) | 72GPasourcesame material and process, different machine maker: Renishaw RenAM 500, 30 µm, as built, horizontal (XY) | 2.8GPasourcetypical |
| Density | 2,670kg/m³sourcetypical part density (ISO 3369), EOS M 290, AlSi10Mg_030_FlexM291 (30 µm) | 1,420kg/m³sourcetypical (DuPont product information for Delrin 100 NC010; 'The data listed here fall within the normal range of product properties') |
| Strength to weight | 101kN·m/kg2.08x higher | 48.6kN·m/kg |
| Stiffness to weight | 27MN·m/kg13.7x higher | 1.97MN·m/kg |
| Poisson's ratio | 0.33sourcebase material: cast Al-Si-Mg alloy 359.0 (Al-9Si-0.6Mg, closest MIL-HDBK-5J alloy to AlSi10Mg / EN AC-43000) | 0.35sourcetypical |
| Shear modulus | 27.1GPa26.1x stiffer in shear | 1.04GPa |
| Bulk modulus | 70.6GPa | 3.11GPa |
| Speed of sound | 5,193m/s | 1,404m/s |
| Thermal | ||
| Thermal conductivity | 110W/m·Ksourcetypical, as manufactured, horizontal (ISO 22007-2) | 0.4W/m·Ksourcetypical |
| Thermal expansion | 20µm/m·Ksourcemean 25-100 °C, ASTM E228 | 122µm/m·Ksourcemean, 29 to 60 °C |
| 100 mm part over a 50 °C swing | 100µm growth6.1x less | 610µm growth |
| Specific heat | 963J/kg·Ksourcebase material: cast Al-Si-Mg alloy 359.0 (MIL-HDBK-5J), at 100 °C | 1,465J/kg·Ksourceaverage -18 to 100 °C, Delrin acetal resins (not grade-specific) |
| Heats up and cools (diffusivity) | 42.8mm²/s222x faster | 0.192mm²/s |
| Thermal shock resistance | 13,819W/m263x more resistant | 52.5W/m |
| Melting point | not sourced | 175°Csourcecrystalline melting point |
| Max service temperature | not sourced | 125°CsourceHDT 1.8 MPa (annealed) |
| Values for | EOS Aluminium AlSi10Mg (powder 9011-0024), EOS M 290 | 30 µm process (AlSi10Mg_FlexM291 2.01), as manufactured, horizontal; machined (turned) specimens, ISO 6892-1 B10 | DuPont Delrin 100 acetal homopolymer, Table 2 'Typical Properties of Delrin Acetal Resins' (ASTM methods), Delrin Design Guide Module III hosted on delrin.com |
Every value links to the document that states it. "Not sourced" means no citable source states it (or only a specification minimum); figures computed from it are left out too.
DMLS AlSi10Mg Aluminum is 3D printed: its properties depend on build direction and print settings; these are typical values.
Questions
Is DMLS AlSi10Mg Aluminum stronger than Plastic POM/Acetal?
DMLS AlSi10Mg Aluminum is stronger: its yield strength is 270 MPa against 69 MPa for Plastic POM/Acetal (3.91x).
Which is lighter, DMLS AlSi10Mg Aluminum or Plastic POM/Acetal?
Plastic POM/Acetal is lighter: 1,420 kg/m³ against 2,670 kg/m³ for DMLS AlSi10Mg Aluminum.
Which is stiffer, DMLS AlSi10Mg Aluminum or Plastic POM/Acetal?
DMLS AlSi10Mg Aluminum is stiffer: Young's modulus 72 GPa against 2.8 GPa for Plastic POM/Acetal, so the same part in DMLS AlSi10Mg Aluminum deflects less under the same load.
Which is lighter for the same job, DMLS AlSi10Mg Aluminum or Plastic POM/Acetal?
For the same stiffness or strength: DMLS AlSi10Mg Aluminum is lighter for a stiff rod or tie (tension), stiff beam (bending), stiff panel or plate, strong rod or tie, strong beam, strong panel or plate.
| Part that must be | DMLS AlSi10Mg Aluminum | Plastic POM/Acetal |
|---|---|---|
| Stiff rod or tie (tension) | lighter | 13.7x heavier |
| Stiff beam (bending) | lighter | 2.7x heavier |
| Stiff panel or plate | lighter | 1.57x heavier |
| Strong rod or tie | lighter | 2.08x heavier |
| Strong beam | lighter | 32% heavier |
| Strong panel or plate | lighter | 5% heavier |
For the same stiffness or strength, mass scales with density over stiffness (or strength) raised to a power set by how the part is loaded: 1 for a rod in tension, 1/2 for a beam in bending, 1/3 for a panel (the standard material-selection indices).
Which conducts heat better, DMLS AlSi10Mg Aluminum or Plastic POM/Acetal?
DMLS AlSi10Mg Aluminum conducts heat better: 110 W/m·K against 0.4 W/m·K for Plastic POM/Acetal.
Which expands less with temperature?
DMLS AlSi10Mg Aluminum expands less: 20 µm/m·K against 122 µm/m·K for Plastic POM/Acetal.
Among 59 materials
Related comparisons
- DMLS AlSi10Mg Aluminum vs. Aluminum
- DMLS AlSi10Mg Aluminum vs. Aluminum 6061-T6
- DMLS AlSi10Mg Aluminum vs. Aluminum 2024-T351
- DMLS AlSi10Mg Aluminum vs. Concrete
- Plastic POM/Acetal vs. SLA Resin Standard
- Plastic POM/Acetal vs. Plastic Polycarbonate
- Plastic POM/Acetal vs. Plastic PMMA
- Plastic POM/Acetal vs. Plastic Nylon