Materials / Compare

Aluminum ADC12 vs. FDM PAHT-CF

Compare Aluminum ADC12 vs. FDM PAHT-CF strength, stiffness, weight and thermal properties.

Change either side
Aluminum ADC12Cast
FDM PAHT-CF3D printed (FDM)
Try it on a partA bracket to run stress or thermal on, free in your browserOpen in LessCADOpen in LessCAD
Mechanical
Yield strength149MPasourceone test result, 0.2% proof stress, as cast, ASTM tensile bar (Daiki)not given (tensile used)
Ultimate tensile strength345MPasourceone test result, as cast, ASTM tensile bar (Daiki)92MPasourcetypical
Flexural strengthnot sourced125MPasourcetypical
Elongation at break2.3%sourceone test result, as cast, ASTM tensile bar (Daiki)8.4%sourcetypical
Young's modulus (stiffness)79.8GPasourcestandard value (S.S.Aluminum)3.86GPasourcetypical
Density2,680kg/m³sourcemeasured (Daiki)1,060kg/m³sourcetypical
Strength to weight55.6kN·m/kg86.8kN·m/kg1.56x higher
Stiffness to weight29.8MN·m/kg8.18x higher3.64MN·m/kg
Poisson's rationot sourcednot sourced
Shear modulusnot sourcednot sourced
Bulk modulusnot sourcednot sourced
Speed of sound5,457m/s1,908m/s
Thermal
Thermal conductivity125W/m·Ksourcemeasured on specimens cut from a 50 x 100 x 5 mm flat die casting (Daiki)not sourced
Thermal expansion21µm/m·Ksourcemeasured, temperature range not stated (Daiki)not sourced
100 mm part over a 50 °C swing105µm growthnot sourced
Specific heat911J/kg·Ksourcemeasured (Daiki)not sourced
Heats up and cools (diffusivity)51.2mm²/snot sourced
Thermal shock resistancenot sourcednot sourced
Melting point515–582°Csourcesolidus-liquidus (Daiki)225°Csourcetypical
Glass transitionnot sourced70°Csourcetypical
Max service temperaturenot sourced170°CsourceHDT 1.8 MPa
Values forJIS ADC12 (Al-Si-Cu, about A383 / EN AC-46100) high-pressure die-casting alloy, as cast; physical properties from Daiki Aluminium Industry (ADC12 ingot producer) measured values; modulus from S.S.Aluminum (ADC12 ingot producer) standard values.Bambu Lab PAHT-CF, TDS V3.0, printed specimens X-Y, dry state; nozzle 290 °C, bed 100 °C, 100 mm/s, 100% infill; annealed and dried 80 °C for 12 h before testing.

Every value links to the document that states it. "Not sourced" means no citable source states it (or only a specification minimum); figures computed from it are left out too.

FDM PAHT-CF is 3D printed: its properties depend on build direction and print settings; these are typical values.

Questions

Is Aluminum ADC12 stronger than FDM PAHT-CF?

Aluminum ADC12 is stronger: its yield strength is 149 MPa against tensile strength 92 MPa for FDM PAHT-CF (1.62x).

Which is lighter, Aluminum ADC12 or FDM PAHT-CF?

FDM PAHT-CF is lighter: 1,060 kg/m³ against 2,680 kg/m³ for Aluminum ADC12.

Which is stiffer, Aluminum ADC12 or FDM PAHT-CF?

Aluminum ADC12 is stiffer: Young's modulus 79.8 GPa against 3.86 GPa for FDM PAHT-CF, so the same part in Aluminum ADC12 deflects less under the same load.

Which is lighter for the same job, Aluminum ADC12 or FDM PAHT-CF?

For the same stiffness or strength: Aluminum ADC12 is lighter for a stiff rod or tie (tension), stiff beam (bending), stiff panel or plate; FDM PAHT-CF is lighter for a strong rod or tie, strong beam, strong panel or plate.

Part that must beAluminum ADC12FDM PAHT-CF
Stiff rod or tie (tension)lighter8.18x heavier
Stiff beam (bending)lighter1.8x heavier
Stiff panel or platelighter9% heavier
Strong rod or tie1.56x heavierlighter
Strong beam1.83x heavierlighter
Strong panel or plate1.99x heavierlighter

For the same stiffness or strength, mass scales with density over stiffness (or strength) raised to a power set by how the part is loaded: 1 for a rod in tension, 1/2 for a beam in bending, 1/3 for a panel (the standard material-selection indices).

Among 72 materials

1k10k0.1110100Density (kg/m³)Young's modulus (GPa)Plastic PLAPlastic PETGPlastic ABSPlastic TPUPlastic NylonAluminumSteelIronTitaniumSteel AISI 1018Stainless Steel 304Stainless Steel 316Aluminum 6061-T6Aluminum 7075-T6Brass C360Copper C110GlassSteel AISI 1045Steel AISI 4340Steel A992Stainless Steel 303Stainless Steel 17-4PHAluminum 2024-T351Aluminum 5052-H32Aluminum 7050-T7451Titanium Ti-6Al-4VBrass C260Nickel Inconel 718Magnesium AZ31B-H24Zinc Zamak 3Plastic ABS (bulk/injection)Plastic PolycarbonatePlastic POM/AcetalPlastic Nylon PA6Plastic Nylon PA66Plastic PEEKPlastic UHMWPEPlastic HDPEPlastic PolypropylenePlastic PMMAFDM ASAFDM PolycarbonateFDM HIPSSLA Resin Tough 2000SLS PA12 NylonDMLS AlSi10Mg AluminumDMLS Ti-6Al-4V ELI TitaniumDMLS 316L Stainless SteelDMLS 17-4PH Stainless SteelPCB Laminate FR-4SiliconCeramic Alumina 96%Ceramic Aluminum NitrideAluminum A380Aluminum 6063-T6Aluminum 1100-OMagnesium AZ91DSolder SAC305Plastic PBT GF30Plastic PPS GF40Plastic LCP GF30Aluminum ADC12FDM PAHT-CF
Stiffness against density
1k10k101001kDensity (kg/m³)Yield strength (MPa)Plastic PLAPlastic PETGPlastic ABSPlastic TPUPlastic NylonRubberAluminumSteelIronTitaniumSteel AISI 1018Stainless Steel 304Stainless Steel 316Aluminum 6061-T6Aluminum 7075-T6Brass C360Copper C110GlassSteel AISI 1045Steel AISI 4340Steel A992Stainless Steel 303Stainless Steel 17-4PHAluminum 2024-T351Aluminum 5052-H32Aluminum 7050-T7451Titanium Ti-6Al-4VBrass C260Nickel Inconel 718Magnesium AZ31B-H24Zinc Zamak 3Plastic ABS (bulk/injection)Plastic PolycarbonatePlastic POM/AcetalPlastic Nylon PA6Plastic Nylon PA66Plastic PEEKPlastic PTFEPlastic UHMWPEPlastic HDPEPlastic PolypropylenePlastic PMMAFDM ASAFDM PolycarbonateFDM HIPSSLA Resin Tough 2000SLA Resin Elastic 50ASLS PA12 NylonDMLS AlSi10Mg AluminumDMLS Ti-6Al-4V ELI TitaniumDMLS 316L Stainless SteelDMLS 17-4PH Stainless SteelBrickPCB Laminate FR-4SiliconCeramic Alumina 96%Aluminum A380Aluminum 6063-T6Aluminum 1100-OMagnesium AZ91DSolder SAC305Plastic PBT GF30Plastic PPS GF40Plastic LCP GF30Aluminum ADC12FDM PAHT-CF
Strength against density

Related comparisons