Materials / Compare

FDM ASA vs. SLA Resin Tough 2000

Compare FDM ASA vs. SLA Resin Tough 2000 strength, stiffness, weight and thermal properties.

Change either side
FDM ASA3D printed (FDM)
SLA Resin Tough 20003D printed (SLA resin)
Try it on a partA bracket to run stress or thermal on, free in your browserOpen in LessCADOpen in LessCAD
Mechanical
Yield strengthnot given (tensile used)40.4MPasourcetypical
Ultimate tensile strength37MPasourcetypical40.4MPasourcetypical
Flexural strength65MPasourcetypical67MPasourcetypical
Elongation at break9.2%sourcetypical79%sourcetypical8.59x more ductile
Young's modulus (stiffness)2.45GPasourcetypical36% stiffer1.8GPasourcetypical
Density1,050kg/m³sourcetypical1,090kg/m³sourcetypical
Strength to weight35.2kN·m/kg37.1kN·m/kg5% higher
Stiffness to weight2.33MN·m/kg41% higher1.65MN·m/kg
Poisson's rationot sourcednot sourced
Shear modulusnot sourcednot sourced
Bulk modulusnot sourcednot sourced
Speed of sound1,528m/s1,285m/s
Thermal
Thermal conductivity0.17W/m·Ksourcebase material: INEOS Styrolution Luran S 777K injection-molding ASA, typicalnot sourced
Thermal expansion80–110µm/m·Ksourcebase material: INEOS Styrolution Luran S 777K injection-molding ASA, range134µm/m·Ksourcemean 0-150 °C
100 mm part over a 50 °C swing475µm growth41% less671µm growth
Specific heatnot sourcednot sourced
Heats up and cools (diffusivity)not sourcednot sourced
Thermal shock resistancenot sourcednot sourced
Glass transitionnot sourced112°CsourceDMA
Max service temperature92°CsourceHDT 1.8 MPa1.61x hotter57°CsourceHDT 1.8 MPa
Values forBambu Lab ASA, TDS V3.0, printed specimens X-Y; nozzle 260 °C, bed 80 °C, 200 mm/s, 100% infill; annealed and dried 80 °C for 12 h before testing.Formlabs Tough 2000 Resin V2 (FLTO2002), TDS Rev. 01 10/06/2025; printed on Form 4 at 100 µm, washed in Form Wash V2 10+5 min in >=99% IPA, post-cured 70 °C for 12 min in Form Cure V2. Orientation not stated.

Every value links to the document that states it. "Not sourced" means no citable source states it (or only a specification minimum); figures computed from it are left out too.

FDM ASA and SLA Resin Tough 2000 are 3D printed: their properties depend on build direction and print settings; these are typical values.

Questions

Is FDM ASA stronger than SLA Resin Tough 2000?

SLA Resin Tough 2000 is stronger: its yield strength is 40.4 MPa against tensile strength 37 MPa for FDM ASA (9%).

Which is lighter, FDM ASA or SLA Resin Tough 2000?

FDM ASA is lighter: 1,050 kg/m³ against 1,090 kg/m³ for SLA Resin Tough 2000.

Which is stiffer, FDM ASA or SLA Resin Tough 2000?

FDM ASA is stiffer: Young's modulus 2.45 GPa against 1.8 GPa for SLA Resin Tough 2000, so the same part in FDM ASA deflects less under the same load.

Which is lighter for the same job, FDM ASA or SLA Resin Tough 2000?

For the same stiffness or strength: FDM ASA is lighter for a stiff rod or tie (tension), stiff beam (bending), stiff panel or plate; SLA Resin Tough 2000 is lighter for a strong rod or tie, strong beam.

Part that must beFDM ASASLA Resin Tough 2000
Stiff rod or tie (tension)lighter41% heavier
Stiff beam (bending)lighter21% heavier
Stiff panel or platelighter15% heavier
Strong rod or tie5% heavierlighter
Strong beam2% heavierlighter
Strong panel or plateabout equalabout equal

For the same stiffness or strength, mass scales with density over stiffness (or strength) raised to a power set by how the part is loaded: 1 for a rod in tension, 1/2 for a beam in bending, 1/3 for a panel (the standard material-selection indices).

Which is more ductile, FDM ASA or SLA Resin Tough 2000?

SLA Resin Tough 2000 stretches further before it breaks: 79% elongation at break against 9.2% for FDM ASA.

Which handles higher temperatures, FDM ASA or SLA Resin Tough 2000?

FDM ASA does: 92 °C against 57 °C for SLA Resin Tough 2000, both HDT 1.8 MPa.

Which expands less with temperature?

FDM ASA expands less: 95 µm/m·K against 134 µm/m·K for SLA Resin Tough 2000.

Among 59 materials

1k10k0.1110100Density (kg/m³)Young's modulus (GPa)Plastic PLAPlastic PETGPlastic ABSPlastic TPUPlastic NylonAluminumSteelIronTitaniumSteel AISI 1018Stainless 304Stainless 316Aluminum 6061-T6Aluminum 7075-T6Brass C360Copper C110GlassSteel AISI 1045Steel AISI 4340Steel A992Stainless 303Stainless 17-4PHAluminum 2024-T351Aluminum 5052-H32Aluminum 7050-T7451Titanium Ti-6Al-4VBrass C260Nickel Inconel 718Magnesium AZ31B-H24Zinc Zamak 3Plastic ABS (bulk/injection)Plastic PolycarbonatePlastic POM/AcetalPlastic Nylon PA6Plastic Nylon PA66Plastic PEEKPlastic UHMWPEPlastic HDPEPlastic PolypropylenePlastic PMMAFDM PolycarbonateFDM PAHT-CFFDM HIPSSLS PA12 NylonDMLS AlSi10Mg AluminumDMLS Ti-6Al-4V ELI TitaniumDMLS 316L Stainless SteelDMLS 17-4PH Stainless SteelFDM ASASLA Resin Tough 2000
Stiffness against density
1k10k101001kDensity (kg/m³)Yield strength (MPa)Plastic PLAPlastic PETGPlastic ABSPlastic TPUPlastic NylonRubberAluminumSteelIronTitaniumSteel AISI 1018Stainless 304Stainless 316Aluminum 6061-T6Aluminum 7075-T6Brass C360Copper C110GlassSteel AISI 1045Steel AISI 4340Steel A992Stainless 303Stainless 17-4PHAluminum 2024-T351Aluminum 5052-H32Aluminum 7050-T7451Titanium Ti-6Al-4VBrass C260Nickel Inconel 718Magnesium AZ31B-H24Zinc Zamak 3Plastic ABS (bulk/injection)Plastic PolycarbonatePlastic POM/AcetalPlastic Nylon PA6Plastic Nylon PA66Plastic PEEKPlastic PTFEPlastic UHMWPEPlastic HDPEPlastic PolypropylenePlastic PMMAFDM PolycarbonateFDM PAHT-CFFDM HIPSSLA Resin Elastic 50ASLS PA12 NylonDMLS AlSi10Mg AluminumDMLS Ti-6Al-4V ELI TitaniumDMLS 316L Stainless SteelDMLS 17-4PH Stainless SteelBrickFDM ASASLA Resin Tough 2000
Strength against density

Related comparisons