Materials / Compare

Brick vs. DMLS 316L Stainless Steel

Compare Brick vs. DMLS 316L Stainless Steel strength, stiffness, weight and thermal properties.

Change either side
BrickNatural
DMLS 316L Stainless Steel3D printed metal (DMLS)
Try it on a partA sample part to run stress or thermal on, free in your browserOpen in LessCADOpen in LessCAD
Mechanical
Yield strengthnot given (tensile used)530MPasourcetypical, as manufactured, horizontal
Ultimate tensile strength5.1MPasourcemodulus of rupture (no direct tensile value)640MPasourcetypical, as manufactured, horizontal
Compressive strength77.9MPasourcemean unit compressive strength, solid extruded brick (survey mean; SD 30.8 MPa)not sourced
Elongation at breaknot sourced40%sourcetypical at break, as manufactured, horizontal
Young's modulus (stiffness)not sourced185GPasourcetypical, as built, horizontal (XY); EOSINT M280-400W / M290-400W, 316L_Surface 1.0, 20 µm (2014 sheet)
Density2,082kg/m³sourceface brick density row used for k (BIA notes most fired clay brick 120-130 lb/ft3)7,900kg/m³sourcepart density (ISO 3369, not labelled min or typical), EOS M 290, 40 µm FlexLine
Strength to weight2.45kN·m/kg67.1kN·m/kg27.4x higher
Stiffness to weightnot sourced23.4MN·m/kg
Poisson's rationot sourced0.3sourcebase material: austenitic stainless steels incl. 1.4404 (316L), design value
Shear modulusnot sourced71.2GPa
Bulk modulusnot sourced154GPa
Speed of soundnot sourced4,839m/s
Thermal
Thermal conductivity0.92–1.12W/m·Ksourcerange for 130 lb/ft3 face brick (ASHRAE 2013 via BIA)16.2W/m·Ksourcebase material: wrought 316/316L (Cleveland-Cliffs), at 100 °C
Thermal expansion7.2µm/m·KsourceTMS Code average coefficient, clay/shale unit masonry15.7µm/m·Ksourcemean 25-100 °C, ASTM E228
100 mm part over a 50 °C swing36µm growth2.18x less78.6µm growth
Specific heat837J/kg·Ksourcevalue used in BIA heat-capacity sample calculation500J/kg·Ksourcebase material: wrought 316/316L (Cleveland-Cliffs), 0-100 °C
Heats up and cools (diffusivity)0.585mm²/s4.1mm²/s7.01x faster
Thermal shock resistancenot sourced2,067W/m
Values forSolid extruded clay/shale brick units (BIA 1993 manufacturer survey, TN 3A 2024); face brick of 130 lb/ft3 for thermal properties (BIA TN 4, from ASHRAE 2013); CTE is the TMS Code value for clay/shale masonryEOS StainlessSteel 316L (powder 9011-0032), EOS M 290, ParameterSet 316L 20µm Surface M290/400W, as manufactured, horizontal; ISO 6892-1

Every value links to the document that states it. "Not sourced" means no citable source states it (or only a specification minimum); figures computed from it are left out too.

DMLS 316L Stainless Steel is 3D printed: its properties depend on build direction and print settings; these are typical values.

Questions

Is Brick stronger than DMLS 316L Stainless Steel?

DMLS 316L Stainless Steel is stronger: its yield strength is 530 MPa against tensile strength 5.1 MPa for Brick (104x).

Which is lighter, Brick or DMLS 316L Stainless Steel?

Brick is lighter: 2,082 kg/m³ against 7,900 kg/m³ for DMLS 316L Stainless Steel.

Which is lighter for the same job, Brick or DMLS 316L Stainless Steel?

For the same stiffness or strength: DMLS 316L Stainless Steel is lighter for a strong rod or tie, strong beam, strong panel or plate.

Part that must beBrickDMLS 316L Stainless Steel
Strong rod or tie27.4x heavierlighter
Strong beam5.83x heavierlighter
Strong panel or plate2.69x heavierlighter

For the same stiffness or strength, mass scales with density over stiffness (or strength) raised to a power set by how the part is loaded: 1 for a rod in tension, 1/2 for a beam in bending, 1/3 for a panel (the standard material-selection indices).

Which conducts heat better, Brick or DMLS 316L Stainless Steel?

DMLS 316L Stainless Steel conducts heat better: 16.2 W/m·K against 1.02 W/m·K for Brick.

Which expands less with temperature?

Brick expands less: 7.2 µm/m·K against 15.7 µm/m·K for DMLS 316L Stainless Steel.

Among 59 materials

1k10k0.1110100Density (kg/m³)Young's modulus (GPa)Plastic PLAPlastic PETGPlastic ABSPlastic TPUPlastic NylonAluminumSteelIronTitaniumSteel AISI 1018Stainless 304Stainless 316Aluminum 6061-T6Aluminum 7075-T6Brass C360Copper C110GlassSteel AISI 1045Steel AISI 4340Steel A992Stainless 303Stainless 17-4PHAluminum 2024-T351Aluminum 5052-H32Aluminum 7050-T7451Titanium Ti-6Al-4VBrass C260Nickel Inconel 718Magnesium AZ31B-H24Zinc Zamak 3Plastic ABS (bulk/injection)Plastic PolycarbonatePlastic POM/AcetalPlastic Nylon PA6Plastic Nylon PA66Plastic PEEKPlastic UHMWPEPlastic HDPEPlastic PolypropylenePlastic PMMAFDM ASAFDM PolycarbonateFDM PAHT-CFFDM HIPSSLA Resin Tough 2000SLS PA12 NylonDMLS AlSi10Mg AluminumDMLS Ti-6Al-4V ELI TitaniumDMLS 17-4PH Stainless SteelDMLS 316L Stainless Steel
Stiffness against density
1k10k101001kDensity (kg/m³)Yield strength (MPa)Plastic PLAPlastic PETGPlastic ABSPlastic TPUPlastic NylonRubberAluminumSteelIronTitaniumSteel AISI 1018Stainless 304Stainless 316Aluminum 6061-T6Aluminum 7075-T6Brass C360Copper C110GlassSteel AISI 1045Steel AISI 4340Steel A992Stainless 303Stainless 17-4PHAluminum 2024-T351Aluminum 5052-H32Aluminum 7050-T7451Titanium Ti-6Al-4VBrass C260Nickel Inconel 718Magnesium AZ31B-H24Zinc Zamak 3Plastic ABS (bulk/injection)Plastic PolycarbonatePlastic POM/AcetalPlastic Nylon PA6Plastic Nylon PA66Plastic PEEKPlastic PTFEPlastic UHMWPEPlastic HDPEPlastic PolypropylenePlastic PMMAFDM ASAFDM PolycarbonateFDM PAHT-CFFDM HIPSSLA Resin Tough 2000SLA Resin Elastic 50ASLS PA12 NylonDMLS AlSi10Mg AluminumDMLS Ti-6Al-4V ELI TitaniumDMLS 17-4PH Stainless SteelBrickDMLS 316L Stainless Steel
Strength against density

Related comparisons