Materials / Compare
Magnesium AZ31B-H24 vs. FDM PAHT-CF
Compare Magnesium AZ31B-H24 vs. FDM PAHT-CF strength, stiffness, weight and thermal properties.
| Try it on a partA bracket to run stress or thermal on, free in your browser | Open in LessCAD | Open in LessCAD |
|---|---|---|
| Mechanical | ||
| Yield strength | 220MPasourcetypical, H24, 0.5-6 mm, 0.2 % proof stress | not given (tensile used) |
| Ultimate tensile strength | 290MPasourcetypical, H24, 0.5-6 mm | 92MPasourcetypical |
| Flexural strength | not sourced | 125MPasourcetypical |
| Elongation at break | 13%sourcetypical, H24, 0.5-6 mm, gauge 5.65√A | 8.4%sourcetypical |
| Young's modulus (stiffness) | 44.8GPasourcetypical (handbook physical constant) | 3.86GPasourcetypical |
| Density | 1,769kg/m³sourcenominal | 1,060kg/m³sourcetypical |
| Strength to weight | 124kN·m/kg43% higher | 86.8kN·m/kg |
| Stiffness to weight | 25.3MN·m/kg6.95x higher | 3.64MN·m/kg |
| Poisson's ratio | 0.35sourcetypical (handbook physical constant) | not sourced |
| Shear modulus | 16.6GPa | not sourced |
| Bulk modulus | 49.8GPa | not sourced |
| Speed of sound | 5,032m/s | 1,908m/s |
| Thermal | ||
| Thermal conductivity | 76.9W/m·Ksourcetypical (temper/temperature not stated) | not sourced |
| Thermal expansion | 26.8µm/m·Ksourcetypical (temperature range not stated) | not sourced |
| 100 mm part over a 50 °C swing | 134µm growth | not sourced |
| Specific heat | 1,040J/kg·Ksourcetypical | not sourced |
| Heats up and cools (diffusivity) | 41.8mm²/s | not sourced |
| Thermal shock resistance | 9,159W/m | not sourced |
| Melting point | not sourced | 225°Csourcetypical |
| Glass transition | not sourced | 70°Csourcetypical |
| Max service temperature | 149°Csourcestated application limit | 170°CsourceHDT 1.8 MPa |
| Values for | AZ31B-H24 sheet 0.016-0.062 in., MIL-HDBK-5J Table 4.2.1.0(b) (AMS 4377); strengths are S-basis MINIMUMS | Bambu Lab PAHT-CF, TDS V3.0, printed specimens X-Y, dry state; nozzle 290 °C, bed 100 °C, 100 mm/s, 100% infill; annealed and dried 80 °C for 12 h before testing. |
Every value links to the document that states it. "Not sourced" means no citable source states it (or only a specification minimum); figures computed from it are left out too.
FDM PAHT-CF is 3D printed: its properties depend on build direction and print settings; these are typical values.
Questions
Is Magnesium AZ31B-H24 stronger than FDM PAHT-CF?
Magnesium AZ31B-H24 is stronger: its yield strength is 220 MPa against tensile strength 92 MPa for FDM PAHT-CF (2.39x).
Which is lighter, Magnesium AZ31B-H24 or FDM PAHT-CF?
FDM PAHT-CF is lighter: 1,060 kg/m³ against 1,769 kg/m³ for Magnesium AZ31B-H24.
Which is stiffer, Magnesium AZ31B-H24 or FDM PAHT-CF?
Magnesium AZ31B-H24 is stiffer: Young's modulus 44.8 GPa against 3.86 GPa for FDM PAHT-CF, so the same part in Magnesium AZ31B-H24 deflects less under the same load.
Which is lighter for the same job, Magnesium AZ31B-H24 or FDM PAHT-CF?
For the same stiffness or strength: Magnesium AZ31B-H24 is lighter for a stiff rod or tie (tension), stiff beam (bending), stiff panel or plate, strong rod or tie, strong beam; FDM PAHT-CF is lighter for a strong panel or plate.
| Part that must be | Magnesium AZ31B-H24 | FDM PAHT-CF |
|---|---|---|
| Stiff rod or tie (tension) | lighter | 6.95x heavier |
| Stiff beam (bending) | lighter | 2.04x heavier |
| Stiff panel or plate | lighter | 36% heavier |
| Strong rod or tie | lighter | 43% heavier |
| Strong beam | lighter | 7% heavier |
| Strong panel or plate | 8% heavier | lighter |
For the same stiffness or strength, mass scales with density over stiffness (or strength) raised to a power set by how the part is loaded: 1 for a rod in tension, 1/2 for a beam in bending, 1/3 for a panel (the standard material-selection indices).