Materials / Compare
Plastic Nylon PA6 vs. DMLS 316L Stainless Steel
Compare Plastic Nylon PA6 vs. DMLS 316L Stainless Steel strength, stiffness, weight and thermal properties.
| Try it on a partA bracket to run stress or thermal on, free in your browser | Open in LessCAD | Open in LessCAD |
|---|---|---|
| Mechanical | ||
| Yield strength | 90MPasourcetypical, dry | 530MPasourcetypical, as manufactured, horizontal |
| Ultimate tensile strength | not sourced | 640MPasourcetypical, as manufactured, horizontal |
| Elongation at break | 10%sourcenominal strain at break, dry | 40%sourcetypical at break, as manufactured, horizontal |
| Young's modulus (stiffness) | 3.5GPasourcetypical, dry | 185GPasourcetypical, as built, horizontal (XY); EOSINT M280-400W / M290-400W, 316L_Surface 1.0, 20 µm (2014 sheet) |
| Density | 1,130kg/m³sourcetypical | 7,900kg/m³sourcepart density (ISO 3369, not labelled min or typical), EOS M 290, 40 µm FlexLine |
| Strength to weight | 79.6kN·m/kg19% higher | 67.1kN·m/kg |
| Stiffness to weight | 3.1MN·m/kg | 23.4MN·m/kg7.56x higher |
| Poisson's ratio | 0.4sourcebase material: unfilled polyamide (PA), conditioned, maker design-guide family value (Covestro Table 3-1) | 0.3sourcebase material: austenitic stainless steels incl. 1.4404 (316L), design value |
| Shear modulus | 1.25GPa | 71.2GPa56.9x stiffer in shear |
| Bulk modulus | 5.83GPa | 154GPa |
| Speed of sound | 1,760m/s | 4,839m/s |
| Thermal | ||
| Thermal conductivity | 0.33W/m·Ksourcetypical | 16.2W/m·Ksourcebase material: wrought 316/316L (Cleveland-Cliffs), at 100 °C |
| Thermal expansion | 102µm/m·Ksourcelongitudinal, 23-55 °C | 15.7µm/m·Ksourcemean 25-100 °C, ASTM E228 |
| 100 mm part over a 50 °C swing | 510µm growth | 78.6µm growth6.49x less |
| Specific heat | 1,700J/kg·Ksourcetypical | 500J/kg·Ksourcebase material: wrought 316/316L (Cleveland-Cliffs), 0-100 °C |
| Heats up and cools (diffusivity) | 0.172mm²/s | 4.1mm²/s23.9x faster |
| Thermal shock resistance | 49.9W/m | 2,067W/m41.4x more resistant |
| Melting point | 220°CsourceDSC | not sourced |
| Max service temperature | 87°CsourceIEC 60216 temperature index, 20000 h | not sourced |
| Values for | BASF Ultramid B3S (PA6, unreinforced injection-moulding grade), Product Information 02/2026, dry values (ISO methods) | EOS StainlessSteel 316L (powder 9011-0032), EOS M 290, ParameterSet 316L 20µm Surface M290/400W, as manufactured, horizontal; ISO 6892-1 |
Every value links to the document that states it. "Not sourced" means no citable source states it (or only a specification minimum); figures computed from it are left out too.
DMLS 316L Stainless Steel is 3D printed: its properties depend on build direction and print settings; these are typical values.
Questions
Is Plastic Nylon PA6 stronger than DMLS 316L Stainless Steel?
DMLS 316L Stainless Steel is stronger: its yield strength is 530 MPa against 90 MPa for Plastic Nylon PA6 (5.89x).
Which is lighter, Plastic Nylon PA6 or DMLS 316L Stainless Steel?
Plastic Nylon PA6 is lighter: 1,130 kg/m³ against 7,900 kg/m³ for DMLS 316L Stainless Steel.
Which is stiffer, Plastic Nylon PA6 or DMLS 316L Stainless Steel?
DMLS 316L Stainless Steel is stiffer: Young's modulus 185 GPa against 3.5 GPa for Plastic Nylon PA6, so the same part in DMLS 316L Stainless Steel deflects less under the same load.
Which is lighter for the same job, Plastic Nylon PA6 or DMLS 316L Stainless Steel?
For the same stiffness or strength: Plastic Nylon PA6 is lighter for a stiff panel or plate, strong rod or tie, strong beam, strong panel or plate; DMLS 316L Stainless Steel is lighter for a stiff rod or tie (tension), stiff beam (bending).
| Part that must be | Plastic Nylon PA6 | DMLS 316L Stainless Steel |
|---|---|---|
| Stiff rod or tie (tension) | 7.56x heavier | lighter |
| Stiff beam (bending) | 4% heavier | lighter |
| Stiff panel or plate | lighter | 1.86x heavier |
| Strong rod or tie | lighter | 19% heavier |
| Strong beam | lighter | 2.14x heavier |
| Strong panel or plate | lighter | 2.88x heavier |
For the same stiffness or strength, mass scales with density over stiffness (or strength) raised to a power set by how the part is loaded: 1 for a rod in tension, 1/2 for a beam in bending, 1/3 for a panel (the standard material-selection indices).
Which conducts heat better, Plastic Nylon PA6 or DMLS 316L Stainless Steel?
DMLS 316L Stainless Steel conducts heat better: 16.2 W/m·K against 0.33 W/m·K for Plastic Nylon PA6.
Which expands less with temperature?
DMLS 316L Stainless Steel expands less: 15.7 µm/m·K against 102 µm/m·K for Plastic Nylon PA6.
Among 59 materials
Related comparisons
- Plastic Nylon PA6 vs. FDM PAHT-CF
- Plastic Nylon PA6 vs. Plastic PMMA
- Plastic Nylon PA6 vs. Plastic Nylon PA66
- Plastic Nylon PA6 vs. Plastic PEEK
- DMLS 316L Stainless Steel vs. Steel AISI 1045
- DMLS 316L Stainless Steel vs. Steel
- DMLS 316L Stainless Steel vs. Steel A992
- DMLS 316L Stainless Steel vs. Steel AISI 1018