Materials / Compare

Plastic PEEK vs. Plastic PETG

Compare Plastic PEEK vs. Plastic PETG strength, stiffness, weight and thermal properties.

Change either side
Plastic PEEKBulk polymer (molded or machined)
Plastic PETG3D printed (FDM)
Try it on a partA bracket to run stress or thermal on, free in your browserOpen in LessCADOpen in LessCAD
Mechanical
Yield strength98MPasourcetypical, tensile yield46.2MPasourcetypical
Ultimate tensile strengthnot sourced46.2MPasourcetypical, peak stress (= stress at yield)
Compressive strength125MPasourcetypical, 23 Cnot sourced
Flexural strength165MPasourcetypical, flexural stress at yield, 23 C78.9MPasourcetypical
Elongation at break25%sourcetypical, at break7.6%sourcetypical
Young's modulus (stiffness)4GPasourcetypical (nominal)1.94GPasourcetypical
Density1,300kg/m³sourcetypical (crystalline)1,270kg/m³sourcetypical
Strength to weight75.4kN·m/kg2.07x higher36.4kN·m/kg
Stiffness to weight3.08MN·m/kg2.02x higher1.53MN·m/kg
Poisson's ratio0.38sourcetypicalnot sourced
Shear modulus1.45GPanot sourced
Bulk modulus5.56GPanot sourced
Speed of sound1,754m/s1,236m/s
Thermal
Thermal conductivity0.29W/m·Ksourcetypical, average, 23 C0.21W/m·Ksourcebase material: Eastman Eastar Copolyester 6763 (PETG), typical
Thermal expansion55µm/m·Ksourceaverage of flow/cross-flow, below Tg (<143 C)51µm/m·Ksourcebase material: Eastman Eastar Copolyester 6763 (PETG), typical
100 mm part over a 50 °C swing275µm growth255µm growth8% less
Specific heat2,200J/kg·Ksourcetypical, 23 °C, DSC (Victrex PEEK 450G TDS, revision Jul 2012)1,300J/kg·Ksourcebase material: Eastman Eastar Copolyester 6763 (PETG), DSC at 60 °C (lowest temperature listed)
Heats up and cools (diffusivity)0.101mm²/s0.127mm²/s25% faster
Thermal shock resistance80.1W/mnot sourced
Melting point343°Csourcetypical, DSCnot sourced
Glass transition143°Csourceonset (midpoint 150 C)77.4°Csourcetypical
Max service temperature240°CsourceUL 746B RTI, mechanical strength (continuous use index)76.2°CsourceHDT 0.455 MPa (printed specimens)
Values forVictrex PEEK 450G (unreinforced, injection moulded), Victrex TDS rev. March 2026; Poisson from Victrex fluid-management flyer (2020-07)Ultimaker PETG, 3D-printed specimens, XY (flat); Ultimaker S5 Pro, engineering intent profile, 0.15 mm layer height, AA 0.4 print core, 100% infill, Cura 4.9, printed one-at-a-time, conditioned >=24 h at room temperature. TDS v1.00, April 29, 2022.

Every value links to the document that states it. "Not sourced" means no citable source states it (or only a specification minimum); figures computed from it are left out too.

Plastic PETG is 3D printed: its properties depend on build direction and print settings; these are typical values.

Questions

Is Plastic PEEK stronger than Plastic PETG?

Plastic PEEK is stronger: its yield strength is 98 MPa against 46.2 MPa for Plastic PETG (2.12x).

Which is lighter, Plastic PEEK or Plastic PETG?

Plastic PETG is lighter: 1,270 kg/m³ against 1,300 kg/m³ for Plastic PEEK.

Which is stiffer, Plastic PEEK or Plastic PETG?

Plastic PEEK is stiffer: Young's modulus 4 GPa against 1.94 GPa for Plastic PETG, so the same part in Plastic PEEK deflects less under the same load.

Which is lighter for the same job, Plastic PEEK or Plastic PETG?

For the same stiffness or strength: Plastic PEEK is lighter for a stiff rod or tie (tension), stiff beam (bending), stiff panel or plate, strong rod or tie, strong beam, strong panel or plate.

Part that must bePlastic PEEKPlastic PETG
Stiff rod or tie (tension)lighter2.02x heavier
Stiff beam (bending)lighter40% heavier
Stiff panel or platelighter24% heavier
Strong rod or tielighter2.07x heavier
Strong beamlighter1.61x heavier
Strong panel or platelighter42% heavier

For the same stiffness or strength, mass scales with density over stiffness (or strength) raised to a power set by how the part is loaded: 1 for a rod in tension, 1/2 for a beam in bending, 1/3 for a panel (the standard material-selection indices).

Which conducts heat better, Plastic PEEK or Plastic PETG?

Plastic PEEK conducts heat better: 0.29 W/m·K against 0.21 W/m·K for Plastic PETG.

Which expands less with temperature?

Plastic PETG expands less: 51 µm/m·K against 55 µm/m·K for Plastic PEEK.

Among 59 materials

1k10k0.1110100Density (kg/m³)Young's modulus (GPa)Plastic PLAPlastic ABSPlastic TPUPlastic NylonAluminumSteelIronTitaniumSteel AISI 1018Stainless 304Stainless 316Aluminum 6061-T6Aluminum 7075-T6Brass C360Copper C110GlassSteel AISI 1045Steel AISI 4340Steel A992Stainless 303Stainless 17-4PHAluminum 2024-T351Aluminum 5052-H32Aluminum 7050-T7451Titanium Ti-6Al-4VBrass C260Nickel Inconel 718Magnesium AZ31B-H24Zinc Zamak 3Plastic ABS (bulk/injection)Plastic PolycarbonatePlastic POM/AcetalPlastic Nylon PA6Plastic Nylon PA66Plastic UHMWPEPlastic HDPEPlastic PolypropylenePlastic PMMAFDM ASAFDM PolycarbonateFDM PAHT-CFFDM HIPSSLA Resin Tough 2000SLS PA12 NylonDMLS AlSi10Mg AluminumDMLS Ti-6Al-4V ELI TitaniumDMLS 316L Stainless SteelDMLS 17-4PH Stainless SteelPlastic PEEKPlastic PETG
Stiffness against density
1k10k101001kDensity (kg/m³)Yield strength (MPa)Plastic PLAPlastic ABSPlastic TPUPlastic NylonRubberAluminumSteelIronTitaniumSteel AISI 1018Stainless 304Stainless 316Aluminum 6061-T6Aluminum 7075-T6Brass C360Copper C110GlassSteel AISI 1045Steel AISI 4340Steel A992Stainless 303Stainless 17-4PHAluminum 2024-T351Aluminum 5052-H32Aluminum 7050-T7451Titanium Ti-6Al-4VBrass C260Nickel Inconel 718Magnesium AZ31B-H24Zinc Zamak 3Plastic ABS (bulk/injection)Plastic PolycarbonatePlastic POM/AcetalPlastic Nylon PA6Plastic Nylon PA66Plastic PTFEPlastic UHMWPEPlastic HDPEPlastic PolypropylenePlastic PMMAFDM ASAFDM PolycarbonateFDM PAHT-CFFDM HIPSSLA Resin Tough 2000SLA Resin Elastic 50ASLS PA12 NylonDMLS AlSi10Mg AluminumDMLS Ti-6Al-4V ELI TitaniumDMLS 316L Stainless SteelDMLS 17-4PH Stainless SteelBrickPlastic PEEKPlastic PETG
Strength against density

Related comparisons