Materials / Compare
FDM Polycarbonate vs. Plastic PETG
Compare FDM Polycarbonate vs. Plastic PETG strength, stiffness, weight and thermal properties.
| Try it on a partA bracket to run stress or thermal on, free in your browser | Open in LessCAD | Open in LessCAD |
|---|---|---|
| Mechanical | ||
| Yield strength | 53.3MPasourcetypical15% stronger | 46.2MPasourcetypical |
| Ultimate tensile strength | 53.3MPasourcetypical, peak stress (= stress at yield)15% stronger | 46.2MPasourcetypical, peak stress (= stress at yield) |
| Flexural strength | 89.4MPasourcetypical13% stronger in bending | 78.9MPasourcetypical |
| Elongation at break | 9.2%sourcetypical21% more ductile | 7.6%sourcetypical |
| Young's modulus (stiffness) | 2.39GPasourcetypical23% stiffer | 1.94GPasourcetypical |
| Density | 1,180–1,200kg/m³sourcerange | 1,270kg/m³sourcetypical |
| Strength to weight | 44.8kN·m/kg23% higher | 36.4kN·m/kg |
| Stiffness to weight | 2.01MN·m/kg32% higher | 1.53MN·m/kg |
| Poisson's ratio | 0.38sourcebase material: polycarbonate family typical (Covestro Part and Mold Design guide, Table 3-1) | not sourced |
| Shear modulus | 0.867GPa | not sourced |
| Bulk modulus | 3.33GPa | not sourced |
| Speed of sound | 1,418m/s | 1,236m/s |
| Thermal | ||
| Thermal conductivity | 0.2W/m·Ksourcebase material: Covestro Makrolon 2405 injection-molding PC, typical, through-plane, 23 °C | 0.21W/m·Ksourcebase material: Eastman Eastar Copolyester 6763 (PETG), typical |
| Thermal expansion | 65µm/m·Ksourcebase material: Covestro Makrolon 2405 injection-molding PC, typical, 23-55 °C, parallel | 51µm/m·Ksourcebase material: Eastman Eastar Copolyester 6763 (PETG), typical |
| 100 mm part over a 50 °C swing | 325µm growth | 255µm growth27% less |
| Specific heat | not sourced | 1,300J/kg·Ksourcebase material: Eastman Eastar Copolyester 6763 (PETG), DSC at 60 °C (lowest temperature listed) |
| Heats up and cools (diffusivity) | not sourced | 0.127mm²/s |
| Thermal shock resistance | 42.5W/m | not sourced |
| Glass transition | 108°Csourcetypical | 77.4°Csourcetypical |
| Max service temperature | 105°CsourceHDT 0.455 MPa (printed specimens)37% hotter | 76.2°CsourceHDT 0.455 MPa (printed specimens) |
| Values for | Ultimaker PC, 3D-printed specimens, XY (flat); Ultimaker S5 Pro, engineering intent profile, 0.15 mm layer height, AA 0.4 print core, 100% infill, Cura 4.9, printed one-at-a-time, conditioned >=24 h at room temperature. TDS (file v5.00), April 20, 2022. | Ultimaker PETG, 3D-printed specimens, XY (flat); Ultimaker S5 Pro, engineering intent profile, 0.15 mm layer height, AA 0.4 print core, 100% infill, Cura 4.9, printed one-at-a-time, conditioned >=24 h at room temperature. TDS v1.00, April 29, 2022. |
Every value links to the document that states it. "Not sourced" means no citable source states it (or only a specification minimum); figures computed from it are left out too.
FDM Polycarbonate and Plastic PETG are 3D printed: their properties depend on build direction and print settings; these are typical values.
Questions
Is FDM Polycarbonate stronger than Plastic PETG?
FDM Polycarbonate is stronger: its yield strength is 53.3 MPa against 46.2 MPa for Plastic PETG (15%).
Which is lighter, FDM Polycarbonate or Plastic PETG?
FDM Polycarbonate is lighter: 1,190 kg/m³ against 1,270 kg/m³ for Plastic PETG.
Which is stiffer, FDM Polycarbonate or Plastic PETG?
FDM Polycarbonate is stiffer: Young's modulus 2.39 GPa against 1.94 GPa for Plastic PETG, so the same part in FDM Polycarbonate deflects less under the same load.
Which is lighter for the same job, FDM Polycarbonate or Plastic PETG?
For the same stiffness or strength: FDM Polycarbonate is lighter for a stiff rod or tie (tension), stiff beam (bending), stiff panel or plate, strong rod or tie, strong beam, strong panel or plate.
| Part that must be | FDM Polycarbonate | Plastic PETG |
|---|---|---|
| Stiff rod or tie (tension) | lighter | 32% heavier |
| Stiff beam (bending) | lighter | 19% heavier |
| Stiff panel or plate | lighter | 14% heavier |
| Strong rod or tie | lighter | 23% heavier |
| Strong beam | lighter | 17% heavier |
| Strong panel or plate | lighter | 15% heavier |
For the same stiffness or strength, mass scales with density over stiffness (or strength) raised to a power set by how the part is loaded: 1 for a rod in tension, 1/2 for a beam in bending, 1/3 for a panel (the standard material-selection indices).
Which is more ductile, FDM Polycarbonate or Plastic PETG?
FDM Polycarbonate stretches further before it breaks: 9.2% elongation at break against 7.6% for Plastic PETG.
Which handles higher temperatures, FDM Polycarbonate or Plastic PETG?
FDM Polycarbonate does: 105 °C against 76.2 °C for Plastic PETG, both HDT 0.455 MPa (printed specimens).
Which conducts heat better, FDM Polycarbonate or Plastic PETG?
Plastic PETG conducts heat better: 0.21 W/m·K against 0.2 W/m·K for FDM Polycarbonate.
Which expands less with temperature?
Plastic PETG expands less: 51 µm/m·K against 65 µm/m·K for FDM Polycarbonate.
Among 59 materials
Related comparisons
- FDM Polycarbonate vs. Plastic Nylon
- FDM Polycarbonate vs. Plastic Polycarbonate
- FDM Polycarbonate vs. Plastic ABS (bulk/injection)
- FDM Polycarbonate vs. SLA Resin Standard
- Plastic PETG vs. SLA Resin Tough 2000
- Plastic PETG vs. Plastic ABS
- Plastic PETG vs. Plastic ABS (bulk/injection)
- Plastic PETG vs. SLS PA12 Nylon