Materials / Compare
Plastic Nylon vs. FDM Polycarbonate
Compare Plastic Nylon vs. FDM Polycarbonate strength, stiffness, weight and thermal properties.
| Try it on a partA bracket to run stress or thermal on, free in your browser | Open in LessCAD | Open in LessCAD |
|---|---|---|
| Mechanical | ||
| Yield strength | 63.1MPasourcetypical18% stronger | 53.3MPasourcetypical |
| Ultimate tensile strength | 63.1MPasourcetypical, peak stress (= stress at yield)18% stronger | 53.3MPasourcetypical, peak stress (= stress at yield) |
| Flexural strength | 82.9MPasourcetypical | 89.4MPasourcetypical |
| Elongation at break | not sourced | 9.2%sourcetypical |
| Young's modulus (stiffness) | 2.33GPasourcetypical | 2.39GPasourcetypical |
| Density | 1,140kg/m³sourcetypical | 1,180–1,200kg/m³sourcerange |
| Strength to weight | 55.4kN·m/kg24% higher | 44.8kN·m/kg |
| Stiffness to weight | 2.04MN·m/kg2% higher | 2.01MN·m/kg |
| Poisson's ratio | 0.4sourcebase material: unfilled polyamide (PA), conditioned, maker design-guide family value (Covestro Table 3-1) | 0.38sourcebase material: polycarbonate family typical (Covestro Part and Mold Design guide, Table 3-1) |
| Shear modulus | 0.833GPa | 0.867GPa4% stiffer in shear |
| Bulk modulus | 3.89GPa | 3.33GPa |
| Speed of sound | 1,430m/s | 1,418m/s |
| Thermal | ||
| Thermal conductivity | 0.33W/m·Ksourcebase material: unreinforced BASF Ultramid PA66 (A3K) and PA6 (B3S), 23 C (same value for both) | 0.2W/m·Ksourcebase material: Covestro Makrolon 2405 injection-molding PC, typical, through-plane, 23 °C |
| Thermal expansion | 98–102µm/m·Ksourcebase material: unreinforced BASF Ultramid PA66 (A3K, 98) and PA6 (B3S, 102), 23-55 C | 65µm/m·Ksourcebase material: Covestro Makrolon 2405 injection-molding PC, typical, 23-55 °C, parallel |
| 100 mm part over a 50 °C swing | 500µm growth | 325µm growth1.54x less |
| Specific heat | 1,700J/kg·Ksourcebase material: unreinforced BASF Ultramid PA66 (A3K) and PA6 (B3S), 23 C (same value for both) | not sourced |
| Heats up and cools (diffusivity) | 0.17mm²/s | not sourced |
| Thermal shock resistance | 53.6W/m26% more resistant | 42.5W/m |
| Melting point | 188°Csourcetypical | not sourced |
| Glass transition | 55.1°Csourcetypical | 108°Csourcetypical |
| Max service temperature | 89.2°CsourceHDT 0.455 MPa (printed specimens) | 105°CsourceHDT 0.455 MPa (printed specimens)17% hotter |
| Values for | Ultimaker Nylon, 3D-printed specimens, XY (flat), conditioned >=24 h at room temperature; Ultimaker S5 Pro, engineering intent profile, 0.15 mm layer height, AA 0.4 print core, 100% infill, Cura 4.9, printed one-at-a-time, conditioned >=24 h at room temperature. TDS v2.00, April 20, 2022. | Ultimaker PC, 3D-printed specimens, XY (flat); Ultimaker S5 Pro, engineering intent profile, 0.15 mm layer height, AA 0.4 print core, 100% infill, Cura 4.9, printed one-at-a-time, conditioned >=24 h at room temperature. TDS (file v5.00), April 20, 2022. |
Every value links to the document that states it. "Not sourced" means no citable source states it (or only a specification minimum); figures computed from it are left out too.
Plastic Nylon and FDM Polycarbonate are 3D printed: their properties depend on build direction and print settings; these are typical values.
Questions
Is Plastic Nylon stronger than FDM Polycarbonate?
Plastic Nylon is stronger: its yield strength is 63.1 MPa against 53.3 MPa for FDM Polycarbonate (18%).
Which is lighter, Plastic Nylon or FDM Polycarbonate?
Plastic Nylon is lighter: 1,140 kg/m³ against 1,190 kg/m³ for FDM Polycarbonate.
Which is stiffer, Plastic Nylon or FDM Polycarbonate?
FDM Polycarbonate is stiffer: Young's modulus 2.39 GPa against 2.33 GPa for Plastic Nylon, so the same part in FDM Polycarbonate deflects less under the same load.
Which is lighter for the same job, Plastic Nylon or FDM Polycarbonate?
For the same stiffness or strength: Plastic Nylon is lighter for a stiff rod or tie (tension), stiff beam (bending), stiff panel or plate, strong rod or tie, strong beam, strong panel or plate.
| Part that must be | Plastic Nylon | FDM Polycarbonate |
|---|---|---|
| Stiff rod or tie (tension) | lighter | 2% heavier |
| Stiff beam (bending) | lighter | 3% heavier |
| Stiff panel or plate | lighter | 3% heavier |
| Strong rod or tie | lighter | 24% heavier |
| Strong beam | lighter | 17% heavier |
| Strong panel or plate | lighter | 14% heavier |
For the same stiffness or strength, mass scales with density over stiffness (or strength) raised to a power set by how the part is loaded: 1 for a rod in tension, 1/2 for a beam in bending, 1/3 for a panel (the standard material-selection indices).
Which handles higher temperatures, Plastic Nylon or FDM Polycarbonate?
FDM Polycarbonate does: 105 °C against 89.2 °C for Plastic Nylon, both HDT 0.455 MPa (printed specimens).
Which conducts heat better, Plastic Nylon or FDM Polycarbonate?
Plastic Nylon conducts heat better: 0.33 W/m·K against 0.2 W/m·K for FDM Polycarbonate.
Which expands less with temperature?
FDM Polycarbonate expands less: 65 µm/m·K against 100 µm/m·K for Plastic Nylon.
Among 59 materials
Related comparisons
- Plastic Nylon vs. Plastic Polycarbonate
- Plastic Nylon vs. SLA Resin Standard
- Plastic Nylon vs. Plastic POM/Acetal
- Plastic Nylon vs. Plastic ABS (bulk/injection)
- FDM Polycarbonate vs. Plastic Polycarbonate
- FDM Polycarbonate vs. Plastic ABS (bulk/injection)
- FDM Polycarbonate vs. SLA Resin Standard
- FDM Polycarbonate vs. Plastic PETG