Materials / Compare
FDM Polycarbonate vs. Plastic Polycarbonate
Compare FDM Polycarbonate vs. Plastic Polycarbonate strength, stiffness, weight and thermal properties.
| Try it on a partA bracket to run stress or thermal on, free in your browser | Open in LessCAD | Open in LessCAD |
|---|---|---|
| Mechanical | ||
| Yield strength | 53.3MPasourcetypical | 65MPasourcetypical, tensile yield |
| Ultimate tensile strength | 53.3MPasourcetypical, peak stress (= stress at yield) | 65MPasourcetypical, stress at break |
| Flexural strength | 89.4MPasourcetypical | 97MPasourcetypical, flexural strength |
| Elongation at break | 9.2%sourcetypical | 125%sourcetypical, strain at break |
| Young's modulus (stiffness) | 2.39GPasourcetypical | 2.4GPasourcetypical |
| Density | 1,180–1,200kg/m³sourcerange | 1,200kg/m³sourcetypical |
| Strength to weight | 44.8kN·m/kg | 54.2kN·m/kg21% higher |
| Stiffness to weight | 2.01MN·m/kg | 2MN·m/kg |
| Poisson's ratio | 0.38sourcebase material: polycarbonate family typical (Covestro Part and Mold Design guide, Table 3-1) | 0.38sourcetypical, polycarbonate family (Covestro Part and Mold Design guide, Table 3-1) |
| Shear modulus | 0.867GPa | 0.87GPa |
| Bulk modulus | 3.33GPa | 3.33GPa |
| Speed of sound | 1,418m/s | 1,414m/s |
| Thermal | ||
| Thermal conductivity | 0.2W/m·Ksourcebase material: Covestro Makrolon 2405 injection-molding PC, typical, through-plane, 23 °C | 0.2W/m·Ksourcetypical, through-plane, 23 C |
| Thermal expansion | 65µm/m·Ksourcebase material: Covestro Makrolon 2405 injection-molding PC, typical, 23-55 °C, parallel | 65µm/m·Ksourcetypical, 23-55 C, parallel and normal |
| 100 mm part over a 50 °C swing | 325µm growth | 325µm growth |
| Specific heat | not sourced | 1,172J/kg·Ksourcetypical (guide value), Bayer ASTM datasheet for Makrolon 2405, ASTM D 2766 |
| Heats up and cools (diffusivity) | not sourced | 0.142mm²/s |
| Thermal shock resistance | 42.5W/m | 51.7W/m22% more resistant |
| Glass transition | 108°Csourcetypical | 144°Csourcetypical, DSC 10 C/min |
| Max service temperature | 105°CsourceHDT 0.455 MPa (printed specimens) | 125°CsourceUL 746B RTI, tensile strength, 1.5 mm |
| Values for | Ultimaker PC, 3D-printed specimens, XY (flat); Ultimaker S5 Pro, engineering intent profile, 0.15 mm layer height, AA 0.4 print core, 100% infill, Cura 4.9, printed one-at-a-time, conditioned >=24 h at room temperature. TDS (file v5.00), April 20, 2022. | Covestro Makrolon 2405 general-purpose PC (MVR 19), Covestro technical datasheet version 2026-09-28, typical values |
Every value links to the document that states it. "Not sourced" means no citable source states it (or only a specification minimum); figures computed from it are left out too.
FDM Polycarbonate is 3D printed: its properties depend on build direction and print settings; these are typical values.
Questions
Is FDM Polycarbonate stronger than Plastic Polycarbonate?
Plastic Polycarbonate is stronger: its yield strength is 65 MPa against 53.3 MPa for FDM Polycarbonate (22%).
Which is lighter, FDM Polycarbonate or Plastic Polycarbonate?
FDM Polycarbonate is lighter: 1,190 kg/m³ against 1,200 kg/m³ for Plastic Polycarbonate.
Which is stiffer, FDM Polycarbonate or Plastic Polycarbonate?
Plastic Polycarbonate is stiffer: Young's modulus 2.4 GPa against 2.39 GPa for FDM Polycarbonate, so the same part in Plastic Polycarbonate deflects less under the same load.
Which is lighter for the same job, FDM Polycarbonate or Plastic Polycarbonate?
For the same stiffness or strength: Plastic Polycarbonate is lighter for a strong rod or tie, strong beam, strong panel or plate.
| Part that must be | FDM Polycarbonate | Plastic Polycarbonate |
|---|---|---|
| Stiff rod or tie (tension) | about equal | about equal |
| Stiff beam (bending) | about equal | about equal |
| Stiff panel or plate | about equal | about equal |
| Strong rod or tie | 21% heavier | lighter |
| Strong beam | 13% heavier | lighter |
| Strong panel or plate | 10% heavier | lighter |
For the same stiffness or strength, mass scales with density over stiffness (or strength) raised to a power set by how the part is loaded: 1 for a rod in tension, 1/2 for a beam in bending, 1/3 for a panel (the standard material-selection indices).
Which conducts heat better, FDM Polycarbonate or Plastic Polycarbonate?
FDM Polycarbonate conducts heat better: 0.2 W/m·K against 0.2 W/m·K for Plastic Polycarbonate.
Which expands less with temperature?
FDM Polycarbonate expands less: 65 µm/m·K against 65 µm/m·K for Plastic Polycarbonate.
Among 59 materials
Related comparisons
- FDM Polycarbonate vs. Plastic Nylon
- FDM Polycarbonate vs. Plastic ABS (bulk/injection)
- FDM Polycarbonate vs. SLA Resin Standard
- FDM Polycarbonate vs. Plastic PETG
- Plastic Polycarbonate vs. Plastic Nylon
- Plastic Polycarbonate vs. SLA Resin Standard
- Plastic Polycarbonate vs. Plastic POM/Acetal
- Plastic Polycarbonate vs. Plastic Nylon PA66