Materials / Compare

FDM Polycarbonate vs. Plastic Polycarbonate

Compare FDM Polycarbonate vs. Plastic Polycarbonate strength, stiffness, weight and thermal properties.

Change either side
FDM Polycarbonate3D printed (FDM)
Plastic PolycarbonateBulk polymer (molded or machined)
Try it on a partA bracket to run stress or thermal on, free in your browserOpen in LessCADOpen in LessCAD
Mechanical
Yield strength53.3MPasourcetypical65MPasourcetypical, tensile yield
Ultimate tensile strength53.3MPasourcetypical, peak stress (= stress at yield)65MPasourcetypical, stress at break
Flexural strength89.4MPasourcetypical97MPasourcetypical, flexural strength
Elongation at break9.2%sourcetypical125%sourcetypical, strain at break
Young's modulus (stiffness)2.39GPasourcetypical2.4GPasourcetypical
Density1,180–1,200kg/m³sourcerange1,200kg/m³sourcetypical
Strength to weight44.8kN·m/kg54.2kN·m/kg21% higher
Stiffness to weight2.01MN·m/kg2MN·m/kg
Poisson's ratio0.38sourcebase material: polycarbonate family typical (Covestro Part and Mold Design guide, Table 3-1)0.38sourcetypical, polycarbonate family (Covestro Part and Mold Design guide, Table 3-1)
Shear modulus0.867GPa0.87GPa
Bulk modulus3.33GPa3.33GPa
Speed of sound1,418m/s1,414m/s
Thermal
Thermal conductivity0.2W/m·Ksourcebase material: Covestro Makrolon 2405 injection-molding PC, typical, through-plane, 23 °C0.2W/m·Ksourcetypical, through-plane, 23 C
Thermal expansion65µm/m·Ksourcebase material: Covestro Makrolon 2405 injection-molding PC, typical, 23-55 °C, parallel65µm/m·Ksourcetypical, 23-55 C, parallel and normal
100 mm part over a 50 °C swing325µm growth325µm growth
Specific heatnot sourced1,172J/kg·Ksourcetypical (guide value), Bayer ASTM datasheet for Makrolon 2405, ASTM D 2766
Heats up and cools (diffusivity)not sourced0.142mm²/s
Thermal shock resistance42.5W/m51.7W/m22% more resistant
Glass transition108°Csourcetypical144°Csourcetypical, DSC 10 C/min
Max service temperature105°CsourceHDT 0.455 MPa (printed specimens)125°CsourceUL 746B RTI, tensile strength, 1.5 mm
Values forUltimaker PC, 3D-printed specimens, XY (flat); Ultimaker S5 Pro, engineering intent profile, 0.15 mm layer height, AA 0.4 print core, 100% infill, Cura 4.9, printed one-at-a-time, conditioned >=24 h at room temperature. TDS (file v5.00), April 20, 2022.Covestro Makrolon 2405 general-purpose PC (MVR 19), Covestro technical datasheet version 2026-09-28, typical values

Every value links to the document that states it. "Not sourced" means no citable source states it (or only a specification minimum); figures computed from it are left out too.

FDM Polycarbonate is 3D printed: its properties depend on build direction and print settings; these are typical values.

Questions

Is FDM Polycarbonate stronger than Plastic Polycarbonate?

Plastic Polycarbonate is stronger: its yield strength is 65 MPa against 53.3 MPa for FDM Polycarbonate (22%).

Which is lighter, FDM Polycarbonate or Plastic Polycarbonate?

FDM Polycarbonate is lighter: 1,190 kg/m³ against 1,200 kg/m³ for Plastic Polycarbonate.

Which is stiffer, FDM Polycarbonate or Plastic Polycarbonate?

Plastic Polycarbonate is stiffer: Young's modulus 2.4 GPa against 2.39 GPa for FDM Polycarbonate, so the same part in Plastic Polycarbonate deflects less under the same load.

Which is lighter for the same job, FDM Polycarbonate or Plastic Polycarbonate?

For the same stiffness or strength: Plastic Polycarbonate is lighter for a strong rod or tie, strong beam, strong panel or plate.

Part that must beFDM PolycarbonatePlastic Polycarbonate
Stiff rod or tie (tension)about equalabout equal
Stiff beam (bending)about equalabout equal
Stiff panel or plateabout equalabout equal
Strong rod or tie21% heavierlighter
Strong beam13% heavierlighter
Strong panel or plate10% heavierlighter

For the same stiffness or strength, mass scales with density over stiffness (or strength) raised to a power set by how the part is loaded: 1 for a rod in tension, 1/2 for a beam in bending, 1/3 for a panel (the standard material-selection indices).

Which conducts heat better, FDM Polycarbonate or Plastic Polycarbonate?

FDM Polycarbonate conducts heat better: 0.2 W/m·K against 0.2 W/m·K for Plastic Polycarbonate.

Which expands less with temperature?

FDM Polycarbonate expands less: 65 µm/m·K against 65 µm/m·K for Plastic Polycarbonate.

Among 59 materials

1k10k0.1110100Density (kg/m³)Young's modulus (GPa)Plastic PLAPlastic PETGPlastic ABSPlastic TPUPlastic NylonAluminumSteelIronTitaniumSteel AISI 1018Stainless 304Stainless 316Aluminum 6061-T6Aluminum 7075-T6Brass C360Copper C110GlassSteel AISI 1045Steel AISI 4340Steel A992Stainless 303Stainless 17-4PHAluminum 2024-T351Aluminum 5052-H32Aluminum 7050-T7451Titanium Ti-6Al-4VBrass C260Nickel Inconel 718Magnesium AZ31B-H24Zinc Zamak 3Plastic ABS (bulk/injection)Plastic POM/AcetalPlastic Nylon PA6Plastic Nylon PA66Plastic PEEKPlastic UHMWPEPlastic HDPEPlastic PolypropylenePlastic PMMAFDM ASAFDM PAHT-CFFDM HIPSSLA Resin Tough 2000SLS PA12 NylonDMLS AlSi10Mg AluminumDMLS Ti-6Al-4V ELI TitaniumDMLS 316L Stainless SteelDMLS 17-4PH Stainless SteelFDM PolycarbonatePlastic Polycarbonate
Stiffness against density
1k10k101001kDensity (kg/m³)Yield strength (MPa)Plastic PLAPlastic PETGPlastic ABSPlastic TPUPlastic NylonRubberAluminumSteelIronTitaniumSteel AISI 1018Stainless 304Stainless 316Aluminum 6061-T6Aluminum 7075-T6Brass C360Copper C110GlassSteel AISI 1045Steel AISI 4340Steel A992Stainless 303Stainless 17-4PHAluminum 2024-T351Aluminum 5052-H32Aluminum 7050-T7451Titanium Ti-6Al-4VBrass C260Nickel Inconel 718Magnesium AZ31B-H24Zinc Zamak 3Plastic ABS (bulk/injection)Plastic POM/AcetalPlastic Nylon PA6Plastic Nylon PA66Plastic PEEKPlastic PTFEPlastic UHMWPEPlastic HDPEPlastic PolypropylenePlastic PMMAFDM ASAFDM PAHT-CFFDM HIPSSLA Resin Tough 2000SLA Resin Elastic 50ASLS PA12 NylonDMLS AlSi10Mg AluminumDMLS Ti-6Al-4V ELI TitaniumDMLS 316L Stainless SteelDMLS 17-4PH Stainless SteelBrickFDM PolycarbonatePlastic Polycarbonate
Strength against density

Related comparisons