Materials / Compare

Plastic PEEK vs. Steel AISI 1045

Compare Plastic PEEK vs. Steel AISI 1045 strength, stiffness, weight and thermal properties.

Change either side
Plastic PEEKBulk polymer (molded or machined)
Steel AISI 1045Wrought
Try it on a partA bracket to run stress or thermal on, free in your browserOpen in LessCADOpen in LessCAD
Mechanical
Yield strength98MPasourcetypical, tensile yield531MPasourceproducer-stated, cold drawn
Ultimate tensile strengthnot sourced627MPasourceproducer-stated, cold drawn
Compressive strength125MPasourcetypical, 23 Cnot sourced
Flexural strength165MPasourcetypical, flexural stress at yield, 23 Cnot sourced
Elongation at break25%sourcetypical, at break12%sourcein 2 in (50.8 mm)
Young's modulus (stiffness)4GPasourcetypical (nominal)210GPasourcetypical
Density1,300kg/m³sourcetypical (crystalline)7,800kg/m³sourcetypical
Strength to weight75.4kN·m/kg11% higher68.1kN·m/kg
Stiffness to weight3.08MN·m/kg26.9MN·m/kg8.75x higher
Poisson's ratio0.38sourcetypical0.3sourcetypical
Shear modulus1.45GPa80.8GPa55.7x stiffer in shear
Bulk modulus5.56GPa175GPa
Speed of sound1,754m/s5,189m/s
Thermal
Thermal conductivity0.29W/m·Ksourcetypical, average, 23 C40–45W/m·Ksourcetypical range, ambient
Thermal expansion55µm/m·Ksourceaverage of flow/cross-flow, below Tg (<143 C)12µm/m·Ksourcetypical, mean 20-300 °C
100 mm part over a 50 °C swing275µm growth60µm growth4.58x less
Specific heat2,200J/kg·Ksourcetypical, 23 °C, DSC (Victrex PEEK 450G TDS, revision Jul 2012)460–480J/kg·Ksourcetypical range, 50/100 °C
Heats up and cools (diffusivity)0.101mm²/s11.6mm²/s114x faster
Thermal shock resistance80.1W/m6,269W/m78.3x more resistant
Melting point343°Csourcetypical, DSCnot sourced
Glass transition143°Csourceonset (midpoint 150 C)not sourced
Max service temperature240°CsourceUL 746B RTI, mechanical strength (continuous use index)not sourced
Values forVictrex PEEK 450G (unreinforced, injection moulded), Victrex TDS rev. March 2026; Poisson from Victrex fluid-management flyer (2020-07)AISI 1045 cold drawn bar (Niagara LaSalle) for mechanical; Ovako C45 (lists 'SAE 1045' as a similar designation) for physical constants

Every value links to the document that states it. "Not sourced" means no citable source states it (or only a specification minimum); figures computed from it are left out too.

Questions

Is Plastic PEEK stronger than Steel AISI 1045?

Steel AISI 1045 is stronger: its yield strength is 531 MPa against 98 MPa for Plastic PEEK (5.42x).

Which is lighter, Plastic PEEK or Steel AISI 1045?

Plastic PEEK is lighter: 1,300 kg/m³ against 7,800 kg/m³ for Steel AISI 1045.

Which is stiffer, Plastic PEEK or Steel AISI 1045?

Steel AISI 1045 is stiffer: Young's modulus 210 GPa against 4 GPa for Plastic PEEK, so the same part in Steel AISI 1045 deflects less under the same load.

Which is lighter for the same job, Plastic PEEK or Steel AISI 1045?

For the same stiffness or strength: Plastic PEEK is lighter for a stiff panel or plate, strong rod or tie, strong beam, strong panel or plate; Steel AISI 1045 is lighter for a stiff rod or tie (tension), stiff beam (bending).

Part that must bePlastic PEEKSteel AISI 1045
Stiff rod or tie (tension)8.75x heavierlighter
Stiff beam (bending)21% heavierlighter
Stiff panel or platelighter1.6x heavier
Strong rod or tielighter11% heavier
Strong beamlighter1.94x heavier
Strong panel or platelighter2.58x heavier

For the same stiffness or strength, mass scales with density over stiffness (or strength) raised to a power set by how the part is loaded: 1 for a rod in tension, 1/2 for a beam in bending, 1/3 for a panel (the standard material-selection indices).

Which conducts heat better, Plastic PEEK or Steel AISI 1045?

Steel AISI 1045 conducts heat better: 42.5 W/m·K against 0.29 W/m·K for Plastic PEEK.

Which expands less with temperature?

Steel AISI 1045 expands less: 12 µm/m·K against 55 µm/m·K for Plastic PEEK.

Among 59 materials

1k10k0.1110100Density (kg/m³)Young's modulus (GPa)Plastic PLAPlastic PETGPlastic ABSPlastic TPUPlastic NylonAluminumSteelIronTitaniumSteel AISI 1018Stainless 304Stainless 316Aluminum 6061-T6Aluminum 7075-T6Brass C360Copper C110GlassSteel AISI 4340Steel A992Stainless 303Stainless 17-4PHAluminum 2024-T351Aluminum 5052-H32Aluminum 7050-T7451Titanium Ti-6Al-4VBrass C260Nickel Inconel 718Magnesium AZ31B-H24Zinc Zamak 3Plastic ABS (bulk/injection)Plastic PolycarbonatePlastic POM/AcetalPlastic Nylon PA6Plastic Nylon PA66Plastic UHMWPEPlastic HDPEPlastic PolypropylenePlastic PMMAFDM ASAFDM PolycarbonateFDM PAHT-CFFDM HIPSSLA Resin Tough 2000SLS PA12 NylonDMLS AlSi10Mg AluminumDMLS Ti-6Al-4V ELI TitaniumDMLS 316L Stainless SteelDMLS 17-4PH Stainless SteelPlastic PEEKSteel AISI 1045
Stiffness against density
1k10k101001kDensity (kg/m³)Yield strength (MPa)Plastic PLAPlastic PETGPlastic ABSPlastic TPUPlastic NylonRubberAluminumSteelIronTitaniumSteel AISI 1018Stainless 304Stainless 316Aluminum 6061-T6Aluminum 7075-T6Brass C360Copper C110GlassSteel AISI 4340Steel A992Stainless 303Stainless 17-4PHAluminum 2024-T351Aluminum 5052-H32Aluminum 7050-T7451Titanium Ti-6Al-4VBrass C260Nickel Inconel 718Magnesium AZ31B-H24Zinc Zamak 3Plastic ABS (bulk/injection)Plastic PolycarbonatePlastic POM/AcetalPlastic Nylon PA6Plastic Nylon PA66Plastic PTFEPlastic UHMWPEPlastic HDPEPlastic PolypropylenePlastic PMMAFDM ASAFDM PolycarbonateFDM PAHT-CFFDM HIPSSLA Resin Tough 2000SLA Resin Elastic 50ASLS PA12 NylonDMLS AlSi10Mg AluminumDMLS Ti-6Al-4V ELI TitaniumDMLS 316L Stainless SteelDMLS 17-4PH Stainless SteelBrickPlastic PEEKSteel AISI 1045
Strength against density

Related comparisons