Materials / Compare

SLA Resin Tough 2000 vs. Stainless 17-4PH

Compare SLA Resin Tough 2000 vs. Stainless 17-4PH strength, stiffness, weight and thermal properties.

Change either side
SLA Resin Tough 20003D printed (SLA resin)
Stainless 17-4PHWrought
Try it on a partA bracket to run stress or thermal on, free in your browserOpen in LessCADOpen in LessCAD
Mechanical
Yield strength40.4MPasourcetypical1,275MPasourcetypical, transverse, sheet/strip
Ultimate tensile strength40.4MPasourcetypical1,379MPasourcetypical, transverse, sheet/strip
Flexural strength67MPasourcetypicalnot sourced
Elongation at break79%sourcetypical9%sourcetypical, transverse, in 2 in. (50.8 mm)
Young's modulus (stiffness)1.8GPasourcetypical197GPasourceH 900
Density1,090kg/m³sourcetypical7,800kg/m³sourceH 900
Strength to weight37.1kN·m/kg163kN·m/kg4.41x higher
Stiffness to weight1.65MN·m/kg25.3MN·m/kg15.3x higher
Poisson's rationot sourced0.272sourceH 900 (column)
Shear modulusnot sourced77.4GPa
Bulk modulusnot sourced144GPa
Speed of sound1,285m/s5,026m/s
Thermal
Thermal conductivitynot sourced17.9W/m·Ksourceat 149 °C (300 °F), H 900
Thermal expansion134µm/m·Ksourcemean 0-150 °C10.8µm/m·Ksourcemean, 21–93 °C (70–200 °F), H 900
100 mm part over a 50 °C swing671µm growth54µm growth12.4x less
Specific heatnot sourced460J/kg·Ksourcemean, 0–100 °C, H 900
Heats up and cools (diffusivity)not sourced4.99mm²/s
Thermal shock resistancenot sourced7,809W/m
Glass transition112°CsourceDMAnot sourced
Max service temperature57°CsourceHDT 1.8 MPa316°Csourcestrength-retention limit (not oxidation)
Values forFormlabs Tough 2000 Resin V2 (FLTO2002), TDS Rev. 01 10/06/2025; printed on Form 4 at 100 µm, washed in Form Wash V2 10+5 min in >=99% IPA, post-cured 70 °C for 12 min in Form Cure V2. Orientation not stated.Cleveland-Cliffs 17-4 PH, Condition H 900, sheet/strip, transverse (Product Data Bulletin, May 2021)

Every value links to the document that states it. "Not sourced" means no citable source states it (or only a specification minimum); figures computed from it are left out too.

SLA Resin Tough 2000 is 3D printed: its properties depend on build direction and print settings; these are typical values.

Questions

Is SLA Resin Tough 2000 stronger than Stainless 17-4PH?

Stainless 17-4PH is stronger: its yield strength is 1,275 MPa against 40.4 MPa for SLA Resin Tough 2000 (31.6x).

Which is lighter, SLA Resin Tough 2000 or Stainless 17-4PH?

SLA Resin Tough 2000 is lighter: 1,090 kg/m³ against 7,800 kg/m³ for Stainless 17-4PH.

Which is stiffer, SLA Resin Tough 2000 or Stainless 17-4PH?

Stainless 17-4PH is stiffer: Young's modulus 197 GPa against 1.8 GPa for SLA Resin Tough 2000, so the same part in Stainless 17-4PH deflects less under the same load.

Which is lighter for the same job, SLA Resin Tough 2000 or Stainless 17-4PH?

For the same stiffness or strength: SLA Resin Tough 2000 is lighter for a stiff panel or plate, strong panel or plate; Stainless 17-4PH is lighter for a stiff rod or tie (tension), stiff beam (bending), strong rod or tie, strong beam.

Part that must beSLA Resin Tough 2000Stainless 17-4PH
Stiff rod or tie (tension)15.3x heavierlighter
Stiff beam (bending)46% heavierlighter
Stiff panel or platelighter50% heavier
Strong rod or tie4.41x heavierlighter
Strong beam40% heavierlighter
Strong panel or platelighter27% heavier

For the same stiffness or strength, mass scales with density over stiffness (or strength) raised to a power set by how the part is loaded: 1 for a rod in tension, 1/2 for a beam in bending, 1/3 for a panel (the standard material-selection indices).

Which expands less with temperature?

Stainless 17-4PH expands less: 10.8 µm/m·K against 134 µm/m·K for SLA Resin Tough 2000.

Among 59 materials

1k10k0.1110100Density (kg/m³)Young's modulus (GPa)Plastic PLAPlastic PETGPlastic ABSPlastic TPUPlastic NylonAluminumSteelIronTitaniumSteel AISI 1018Stainless 304Stainless 316Aluminum 6061-T6Aluminum 7075-T6Brass C360Copper C110GlassSteel AISI 1045Steel AISI 4340Steel A992Stainless 303Aluminum 2024-T351Aluminum 5052-H32Aluminum 7050-T7451Titanium Ti-6Al-4VBrass C260Nickel Inconel 718Magnesium AZ31B-H24Zinc Zamak 3Plastic ABS (bulk/injection)Plastic PolycarbonatePlastic POM/AcetalPlastic Nylon PA6Plastic Nylon PA66Plastic PEEKPlastic UHMWPEPlastic HDPEPlastic PolypropylenePlastic PMMAFDM ASAFDM PolycarbonateFDM PAHT-CFFDM HIPSSLS PA12 NylonDMLS AlSi10Mg AluminumDMLS Ti-6Al-4V ELI TitaniumDMLS 316L Stainless SteelDMLS 17-4PH Stainless SteelSLA Resin Tough 2000Stainless 17-4PH
Stiffness against density
1k10k101001kDensity (kg/m³)Yield strength (MPa)Plastic PLAPlastic PETGPlastic ABSPlastic TPUPlastic NylonRubberAluminumSteelIronTitaniumSteel AISI 1018Stainless 304Stainless 316Aluminum 6061-T6Aluminum 7075-T6Brass C360Copper C110GlassSteel AISI 1045Steel AISI 4340Steel A992Stainless 303Aluminum 2024-T351Aluminum 5052-H32Aluminum 7050-T7451Titanium Ti-6Al-4VBrass C260Nickel Inconel 718Magnesium AZ31B-H24Zinc Zamak 3Plastic ABS (bulk/injection)Plastic PolycarbonatePlastic POM/AcetalPlastic Nylon PA6Plastic Nylon PA66Plastic PEEKPlastic PTFEPlastic UHMWPEPlastic HDPEPlastic PolypropylenePlastic PMMAFDM ASAFDM PolycarbonateFDM PAHT-CFFDM HIPSSLA Resin Elastic 50ASLS PA12 NylonDMLS AlSi10Mg AluminumDMLS Ti-6Al-4V ELI TitaniumDMLS 316L Stainless SteelDMLS 17-4PH Stainless SteelBrickSLA Resin Tough 2000Stainless 17-4PH
Strength against density

Related comparisons