Materials / Compare

Stainless 17-4PH vs. DMLS 17-4PH Stainless Steel

Compare Stainless 17-4PH vs. DMLS 17-4PH Stainless Steel strength, stiffness, weight and thermal properties.

Change either side
Stainless 17-4PHWrought
DMLS 17-4PH Stainless Steel3D printed metal (DMLS)
Try it on a partA bracket to run stress or thermal on, free in your browserOpen in LessCADOpen in LessCAD
Mechanical
Yield strength1,275MPasourcetypical, transverse, sheet/strip861MPasourcemean, as built, horizontal (N=72)
Ultimate tensile strength1,379MPasourcetypical, transverse, sheet/strip886MPasourcemean, as built, horizontal (N=72)
Elongation at break9%sourcetypical, transverse, in 2 in. (50.8 mm)19.9%sourcemean at break, as built, horizontal
Young's modulus (stiffness)197GPasourceH 900197GPasourcebase material: wrought 17-4 PH, Condition H 900 (Cleveland-Cliffs)
Density7,800kg/m³sourceH 9007,790kg/m³sourcemean part density (ISO 3369)
Strength to weight163kN·m/kg48% higher110kN·m/kg
Stiffness to weight25.3MN·m/kg25.3MN·m/kg
Poisson's ratio0.272sourceH 900 (column)0.272sourcebase material: wrought 17-4 PH, all conditions (Cleveland-Cliffs)
Shear modulus77.4GPa77.4GPa
Bulk modulus144GPa144GPa
Speed of sound5,026m/s5,029m/s
Thermal
Thermal conductivity17.9W/m·Ksourceat 149 °C (300 °F), H 90017.9W/m·Ksourcebase material: wrought 17-4 PH, Condition H 900, at 149 °C (Cleveland-Cliffs)
Thermal expansion10.8µm/m·Ksourcemean, 21–93 °C (70–200 °F), H 90010.4µm/m·Ksourcemean 25-100 °C, ASTM E228, AFTER atmospheric heat treatment (as-built value not published)
100 mm part over a 50 °C swing54µm growth52µm growth4% less
Specific heat460J/kg·Ksourcemean, 0–100 °C, H 900460J/kg·Ksourcebase material: wrought 17-4 PH, Condition A, 0-100 °C (Cleveland-Cliffs)
Heats up and cools (diffusivity)4.99mm²/s5mm²/s
Thermal shock resistance7,809W/m43% more resistant5,474W/m
Max service temperature316°Csourcestrength-retention limit (not oxidation)not sourced
Values forCleveland-Cliffs 17-4 PH, Condition H 900, sheet/strip, transverse (Product Data Bulletin, May 2021)EOS StainlessSteel 17-4PH IndustryLine (powder 9011-0041), EOS M 290, 40 µm, default job 17-4PH_040_StainlessM291_100, as built, horizontal; ISO 6892 & ASTM E8M

Every value links to the document that states it. "Not sourced" means no citable source states it (or only a specification minimum); figures computed from it are left out too.

DMLS 17-4PH Stainless Steel is 3D printed: its properties depend on build direction and print settings; these are typical values.

Questions

Is Stainless 17-4PH stronger than DMLS 17-4PH Stainless Steel?

Stainless 17-4PH is stronger: its yield strength is 1,275 MPa against 861 MPa for DMLS 17-4PH Stainless Steel (48%).

Which is lighter, Stainless 17-4PH or DMLS 17-4PH Stainless Steel?

DMLS 17-4PH Stainless Steel is lighter: 7,790 kg/m³ against 7,800 kg/m³ for Stainless 17-4PH.

Which is stiffer, Stainless 17-4PH or DMLS 17-4PH Stainless Steel?

Stainless 17-4PH is stiffer: Young's modulus 197 GPa against 197 GPa for DMLS 17-4PH Stainless Steel, so the same part in Stainless 17-4PH deflects less under the same load.

Which is lighter for the same job, Stainless 17-4PH or DMLS 17-4PH Stainless Steel?

For the same stiffness or strength: Stainless 17-4PH is lighter for a strong rod or tie, strong beam, strong panel or plate.

Part that must beStainless 17-4PHDMLS 17-4PH Stainless Steel
Stiff rod or tie (tension)about equalabout equal
Stiff beam (bending)about equalabout equal
Stiff panel or plateabout equalabout equal
Strong rod or tielighter48% heavier
Strong beamlighter30% heavier
Strong panel or platelighter22% heavier

For the same stiffness or strength, mass scales with density over stiffness (or strength) raised to a power set by how the part is loaded: 1 for a rod in tension, 1/2 for a beam in bending, 1/3 for a panel (the standard material-selection indices).

Which conducts heat better, Stainless 17-4PH or DMLS 17-4PH Stainless Steel?

Stainless 17-4PH conducts heat better: 17.9 W/m·K against 17.9 W/m·K for DMLS 17-4PH Stainless Steel.

Which expands less with temperature?

DMLS 17-4PH Stainless Steel expands less: 10.4 µm/m·K against 10.8 µm/m·K for Stainless 17-4PH.

Among 59 materials

1k10k0.1110100Density (kg/m³)Young's modulus (GPa)Plastic PLAPlastic PETGPlastic ABSPlastic TPUPlastic NylonAluminumSteelIronTitaniumSteel AISI 1018Stainless 304Stainless 316Aluminum 6061-T6Aluminum 7075-T6Brass C360Copper C110GlassSteel AISI 1045Steel AISI 4340Steel A992Stainless 303Aluminum 2024-T351Aluminum 5052-H32Aluminum 7050-T7451Titanium Ti-6Al-4VBrass C260Nickel Inconel 718Magnesium AZ31B-H24Zinc Zamak 3Plastic ABS (bulk/injection)Plastic PolycarbonatePlastic POM/AcetalPlastic Nylon PA6Plastic Nylon PA66Plastic PEEKPlastic UHMWPEPlastic HDPEPlastic PolypropylenePlastic PMMAFDM ASAFDM PolycarbonateFDM PAHT-CFFDM HIPSSLA Resin Tough 2000SLS PA12 NylonDMLS AlSi10Mg AluminumDMLS Ti-6Al-4V ELI TitaniumDMLS 316L Stainless SteelStainless 17-4PHDMLS 17-4PH Stainless Steel
Stiffness against density
1k10k101001kDensity (kg/m³)Yield strength (MPa)Plastic PLAPlastic PETGPlastic ABSPlastic TPUPlastic NylonRubberAluminumSteelIronTitaniumSteel AISI 1018Stainless 304Stainless 316Aluminum 6061-T6Aluminum 7075-T6Brass C360Copper C110GlassSteel AISI 1045Steel AISI 4340Steel A992Stainless 303Aluminum 2024-T351Aluminum 5052-H32Aluminum 7050-T7451Titanium Ti-6Al-4VBrass C260Nickel Inconel 718Magnesium AZ31B-H24Zinc Zamak 3Plastic ABS (bulk/injection)Plastic PolycarbonatePlastic POM/AcetalPlastic Nylon PA6Plastic Nylon PA66Plastic PEEKPlastic PTFEPlastic UHMWPEPlastic HDPEPlastic PolypropylenePlastic PMMAFDM ASAFDM PolycarbonateFDM PAHT-CFFDM HIPSSLA Resin Tough 2000SLA Resin Elastic 50ASLS PA12 NylonDMLS AlSi10Mg AluminumDMLS Ti-6Al-4V ELI TitaniumDMLS 316L Stainless SteelBrickStainless 17-4PHDMLS 17-4PH Stainless Steel
Strength against density

Related comparisons