Materials / Compare
Nickel Inconel 718 vs. DMLS 17-4PH Stainless Steel
Compare Nickel Inconel 718 vs. DMLS 17-4PH Stainless Steel strength, stiffness, weight and thermal properties.
| Try it on a partA bracket to run stress or thermal on, free in your browser | Open in LessCAD | Open in LessCAD |
|---|---|---|
| Mechanical | ||
| Yield strength | 1,207MPasourcetypical, 1.0 in. hot-rolled bar, 0.2% offset | 861MPasourcemean, as built, horizontal (N=72) |
| Ultimate tensile strength | 1,389MPasourcetypical, 1.0 in. bar | 886MPasourcemean, as built, horizontal (N=72) |
| Elongation at break | 20%sourcetypical, 1.0 in. bar | 19.9%sourcemean at break, as built, horizontal |
| Young's modulus (stiffness) | 200GPasourcetypical, 21 °C, annealed + aged | 197GPasourcebase material: wrought 17-4 PH, Condition H 900 (Cleveland-Cliffs) |
| Density | 8,221kg/m³sourcenominal, annealed and aged | 7,790kg/m³sourcemean part density (ISO 3369) |
| Strength to weight | 147kN·m/kg33% higher | 110kN·m/kg |
| Stiffness to weight | 24.3MN·m/kg | 25.3MN·m/kg4% higher |
| Poisson's ratio | 0.294sourcetypical, 21 °C, annealed + aged | 0.272sourcebase material: wrought 17-4 PH, all conditions (Cleveland-Cliffs) |
| Shear modulus | 77.3GPa | 77.4GPa |
| Bulk modulus | 162GPa | 144GPa |
| Speed of sound | 4,932m/s | 5,029m/s |
| Thermal | ||
| Thermal conductivity | 11.4W/m·Ksourcetypical, 21 °C, annealed + aged (calculated from resistivity per footnote a) | 17.9W/m·Ksourcebase material: wrought 17-4 PH, Condition H 900, at 149 °C (Cleveland-Cliffs) |
| Thermal expansion | 13.2µm/m·Ksourcetypical, mean 21-93 °C, annealed + aged | 10.4µm/m·Ksourcemean 25-100 °C, ASTM E228, AFTER atmospheric heat treatment (as-built value not published) |
| 100 mm part over a 50 °C swing | 66µm growth | 52µm growth27% less |
| Specific heat | 435J/kg·Ksourcetypical, 21 °C | 460J/kg·Ksourcebase material: wrought 17-4 PH, Condition A, 0-100 °C (Cleveland-Cliffs) |
| Heats up and cools (diffusivity) | 3.19mm²/s | 5mm²/s1.57x faster |
| Thermal shock resistance | 3,680W/m | 5,474W/m49% more resistant |
| Melting point | 1,260–1,336°Csourcemelting range | not sourced |
| Max service temperature | 704°Csourceupper use temperature stated by producer | not sourced |
| Values for | INCONEL alloy 718, standard grade, 1750 °F/1 hr anneal + 1325 °F/8 hr F.C. to 1150 °F aged; Special Metals bulletin SMC-045 typical values | EOS StainlessSteel 17-4PH IndustryLine (powder 9011-0041), EOS M 290, 40 µm, default job 17-4PH_040_StainlessM291_100, as built, horizontal; ISO 6892 & ASTM E8M |
Every value links to the document that states it. "Not sourced" means no citable source states it (or only a specification minimum); figures computed from it are left out too.
DMLS 17-4PH Stainless Steel is 3D printed: its properties depend on build direction and print settings; these are typical values.
Questions
Is Nickel Inconel 718 stronger than DMLS 17-4PH Stainless Steel?
Nickel Inconel 718 is stronger: its yield strength is 1,207 MPa against 861 MPa for DMLS 17-4PH Stainless Steel (40%).
Which is lighter, Nickel Inconel 718 or DMLS 17-4PH Stainless Steel?
DMLS 17-4PH Stainless Steel is lighter: 7,790 kg/m³ against 8,221 kg/m³ for Nickel Inconel 718.
Which is stiffer, Nickel Inconel 718 or DMLS 17-4PH Stainless Steel?
Nickel Inconel 718 is stiffer: Young's modulus 200 GPa against 197 GPa for DMLS 17-4PH Stainless Steel, so the same part in Nickel Inconel 718 deflects less under the same load.
Which is lighter for the same job, Nickel Inconel 718 or DMLS 17-4PH Stainless Steel?
For the same stiffness or strength: Nickel Inconel 718 is lighter for a strong rod or tie, strong beam, strong panel or plate; DMLS 17-4PH Stainless Steel is lighter for a stiff rod or tie (tension), stiff beam (bending), stiff panel or plate.
| Part that must be | Nickel Inconel 718 | DMLS 17-4PH Stainless Steel |
|---|---|---|
| Stiff rod or tie (tension) | 4% heavier | lighter |
| Stiff beam (bending) | 5% heavier | lighter |
| Stiff panel or plate | 5% heavier | lighter |
| Strong rod or tie | lighter | 33% heavier |
| Strong beam | lighter | 19% heavier |
| Strong panel or plate | lighter | 12% heavier |
For the same stiffness or strength, mass scales with density over stiffness (or strength) raised to a power set by how the part is loaded: 1 for a rod in tension, 1/2 for a beam in bending, 1/3 for a panel (the standard material-selection indices).
Which conducts heat better, Nickel Inconel 718 or DMLS 17-4PH Stainless Steel?
DMLS 17-4PH Stainless Steel conducts heat better: 17.9 W/m·K against 11.4 W/m·K for Nickel Inconel 718.
Which expands less with temperature?
DMLS 17-4PH Stainless Steel expands less: 10.4 µm/m·K against 13.2 µm/m·K for Nickel Inconel 718.
Among 59 materials
Related comparisons
- Nickel Inconel 718 vs. Stainless 17-4PH
- Nickel Inconel 718 vs. Steel AISI 4340
- Nickel Inconel 718 vs. Steel AISI 1045
- Nickel Inconel 718 vs. DMLS 316L Stainless Steel
- DMLS 17-4PH Stainless Steel vs. Steel AISI 4340
- DMLS 17-4PH Stainless Steel vs. Stainless 17-4PH
- DMLS 17-4PH Stainless Steel vs. Steel AISI 1045
- DMLS 17-4PH Stainless Steel vs. DMLS 316L Stainless Steel