Materials / Compare
Nickel Inconel 718 vs. Steel AISI 4340
Compare Nickel Inconel 718 vs. Steel AISI 4340 strength, stiffness, weight and thermal properties.
| Try it on a partA bracket to run stress or thermal on, free in your browser | Open in LessCAD | Open in LessCAD |
|---|---|---|
| Mechanical | ||
| Yield strength | 1,207MPasourcetypical, 1.0 in. hot-rolled bar, 0.2% offset | 1,035MPasourcetypical, transverse |
| Ultimate tensile strength | 1,389MPasourcetypical, 1.0 in. bar | 1,140MPasourcetypical, transverse |
| Elongation at break | 20%sourcetypical, 1.0 in. bar | 18%sourcetypical, transverse |
| Young's modulus (stiffness) | 200GPasourcetypical, 21 °C, annealed + aged | 200GPasourceMIL-HDBK-5J design value (AISI 4340, quenched and tempered) |
| Density | 8,221kg/m³sourcenominal, annealed and aged | 7,840kg/m³sourcetypical |
| Strength to weight | 147kN·m/kg11% higher | 132kN·m/kg |
| Stiffness to weight | 24.3MN·m/kg | 25.5MN·m/kg5% higher |
| Poisson's ratio | 0.294sourcetypical, 21 °C, annealed + aged | 0.32sourceMIL-HDBK-5J design value (AISI 4340, quenched and tempered) |
| Shear modulus | 77.3GPa2% stiffer in shear | 75.7GPa |
| Bulk modulus | 162GPa | 185GPa |
| Speed of sound | 4,932m/s | 5,049m/s |
| Thermal | ||
| Thermal conductivity | 11.4W/m·Ksourcetypical, 21 °C, annealed + aged (calculated from resistivity per footnote a) | 37.5W/m·Ksourcetypical |
| Thermal expansion | 13.2µm/m·Ksourcetypical, mean 21-93 °C, annealed + aged | 11.3µm/m·Ksourcemean, -18 to 93 °C |
| 100 mm part over a 50 °C swing | 66µm growth | 56.5µm growth17% less |
| Specific heat | 435J/kg·Ksourcetypical, 21 °C | 448J/kg·Ksourcetypical |
| Heats up and cools (diffusivity) | 3.19mm²/s | 10.7mm²/s3.35x faster |
| Thermal shock resistance | 3,680W/m | 11,678W/m3.17x more resistant |
| Melting point | 1,260–1,336°Csourcemelting range | not sourced |
| Max service temperature | 704°Csourceupper use temperature stated by producer | not sourced |
| Values for | INCONEL alloy 718, standard grade, 1750 °F/1 hr anneal + 1325 °F/8 hr F.C. to 1150 °F aged; Special Metals bulletin SMC-045 typical values | Carpenter (Latrobe) Lescalloy 4340 VAC-ARC datasheet; mechanical row for 1100 °F temper; physical properties grade-level |
Every value links to the document that states it. "Not sourced" means no citable source states it (or only a specification minimum); figures computed from it are left out too.
Questions
Is Nickel Inconel 718 stronger than Steel AISI 4340?
Nickel Inconel 718 is stronger: its yield strength is 1,207 MPa against 1,035 MPa for Steel AISI 4340 (17%).
Which is lighter, Nickel Inconel 718 or Steel AISI 4340?
Steel AISI 4340 is lighter: 7,840 kg/m³ against 8,221 kg/m³ for Nickel Inconel 718.
Which is stiffer, Nickel Inconel 718 or Steel AISI 4340?
Nickel Inconel 718 is stiffer: Young's modulus 200 GPa against 200 GPa for Steel AISI 4340, so the same part in Nickel Inconel 718 deflects less under the same load.
Which is lighter for the same job, Nickel Inconel 718 or Steel AISI 4340?
For the same stiffness or strength: Nickel Inconel 718 is lighter for a strong rod or tie, strong beam, strong panel or plate; Steel AISI 4340 is lighter for a stiff rod or tie (tension), stiff beam (bending), stiff panel or plate.
| Part that must be | Nickel Inconel 718 | Steel AISI 4340 |
|---|---|---|
| Stiff rod or tie (tension) | 5% heavier | lighter |
| Stiff beam (bending) | 5% heavier | lighter |
| Stiff panel or plate | 5% heavier | lighter |
| Strong rod or tie | lighter | 11% heavier |
| Strong beam | lighter | 6% heavier |
| Strong panel or plate | lighter | 3% heavier |
For the same stiffness or strength, mass scales with density over stiffness (or strength) raised to a power set by how the part is loaded: 1 for a rod in tension, 1/2 for a beam in bending, 1/3 for a panel (the standard material-selection indices).
Which conducts heat better, Nickel Inconel 718 or Steel AISI 4340?
Steel AISI 4340 conducts heat better: 37.5 W/m·K against 11.4 W/m·K for Nickel Inconel 718.
Which expands less with temperature?
Steel AISI 4340 expands less: 11.3 µm/m·K against 13.2 µm/m·K for Nickel Inconel 718.
Among 59 materials
Related comparisons
- Nickel Inconel 718 vs. Stainless 17-4PH
- Nickel Inconel 718 vs. DMLS 17-4PH Stainless Steel
- Nickel Inconel 718 vs. Steel AISI 1045
- Nickel Inconel 718 vs. DMLS 316L Stainless Steel
- Steel AISI 4340 vs. DMLS 17-4PH Stainless Steel
- Steel AISI 4340 vs. Stainless 17-4PH
- Steel AISI 4340 vs. Steel AISI 1045
- Steel AISI 4340 vs. DMLS 316L Stainless Steel