Materials / Compare
DMLS 17-4PH Stainless Steel vs. Steel AISI 4340
Compare DMLS 17-4PH Stainless Steel vs. Steel AISI 4340 strength, stiffness, weight and thermal properties.
| Try it on a partA bracket to run stress or thermal on, free in your browser | Open in LessCAD | Open in LessCAD |
|---|---|---|
| Mechanical | ||
| Yield strength | 861MPasourcemean, as built, horizontal (N=72) | 1,035MPasourcetypical, transverse |
| Ultimate tensile strength | 886MPasourcemean, as built, horizontal (N=72) | 1,140MPasourcetypical, transverse |
| Elongation at break | 19.9%sourcemean at break, as built, horizontal | 18%sourcetypical, transverse |
| Young's modulus (stiffness) | 197GPasourcebase material: wrought 17-4 PH, Condition H 900 (Cleveland-Cliffs) | 200GPasourceMIL-HDBK-5J design value (AISI 4340, quenched and tempered) |
| Density | 7,790kg/m³sourcemean part density (ISO 3369) | 7,840kg/m³sourcetypical |
| Strength to weight | 110kN·m/kg | 132kN·m/kg19% higher |
| Stiffness to weight | 25.3MN·m/kg | 25.5MN·m/kg |
| Poisson's ratio | 0.272sourcebase material: wrought 17-4 PH, all conditions (Cleveland-Cliffs) | 0.32sourceMIL-HDBK-5J design value (AISI 4340, quenched and tempered) |
| Shear modulus | 77.4GPa2% stiffer in shear | 75.7GPa |
| Bulk modulus | 144GPa | 185GPa |
| Speed of sound | 5,029m/s | 5,049m/s |
| Thermal | ||
| Thermal conductivity | 17.9W/m·Ksourcebase material: wrought 17-4 PH, Condition H 900, at 149 °C (Cleveland-Cliffs) | 37.5W/m·Ksourcetypical |
| Thermal expansion | 10.4µm/m·Ksourcemean 25-100 °C, ASTM E228, AFTER atmospheric heat treatment (as-built value not published) | 11.3µm/m·Ksourcemean, -18 to 93 °C |
| 100 mm part over a 50 °C swing | 52µm growth9% less | 56.5µm growth |
| Specific heat | 460J/kg·Ksourcebase material: wrought 17-4 PH, Condition A, 0-100 °C (Cleveland-Cliffs) | 448J/kg·Ksourcetypical |
| Heats up and cools (diffusivity) | 5mm²/s | 10.7mm²/s2.14x faster |
| Thermal shock resistance | 5,474W/m | 11,678W/m2.13x more resistant |
| Values for | EOS StainlessSteel 17-4PH IndustryLine (powder 9011-0041), EOS M 290, 40 µm, default job 17-4PH_040_StainlessM291_100, as built, horizontal; ISO 6892 & ASTM E8M | Carpenter (Latrobe) Lescalloy 4340 VAC-ARC datasheet; mechanical row for 1100 °F temper; physical properties grade-level |
Every value links to the document that states it. "Not sourced" means no citable source states it (or only a specification minimum); figures computed from it are left out too.
DMLS 17-4PH Stainless Steel is 3D printed: its properties depend on build direction and print settings; these are typical values.
Questions
Is DMLS 17-4PH Stainless Steel stronger than Steel AISI 4340?
Steel AISI 4340 is stronger: its yield strength is 1,035 MPa against 861 MPa for DMLS 17-4PH Stainless Steel (20%).
Which is lighter, DMLS 17-4PH Stainless Steel or Steel AISI 4340?
DMLS 17-4PH Stainless Steel is lighter: 7,790 kg/m³ against 7,840 kg/m³ for Steel AISI 4340.
Which is stiffer, DMLS 17-4PH Stainless Steel or Steel AISI 4340?
Steel AISI 4340 is stiffer: Young's modulus 200 GPa against 197 GPa for DMLS 17-4PH Stainless Steel, so the same part in Steel AISI 4340 deflects less under the same load.
Which is lighter for the same job, DMLS 17-4PH Stainless Steel or Steel AISI 4340?
For the same stiffness or strength: Steel AISI 4340 is lighter for a strong rod or tie, strong beam, strong panel or plate.
| Part that must be | DMLS 17-4PH Stainless Steel | Steel AISI 4340 |
|---|---|---|
| Stiff rod or tie (tension) | about equal | about equal |
| Stiff beam (bending) | about equal | about equal |
| Stiff panel or plate | about equal | about equal |
| Strong rod or tie | 19% heavier | lighter |
| Strong beam | 12% heavier | lighter |
| Strong panel or plate | 9% heavier | lighter |
For the same stiffness or strength, mass scales with density over stiffness (or strength) raised to a power set by how the part is loaded: 1 for a rod in tension, 1/2 for a beam in bending, 1/3 for a panel (the standard material-selection indices).
Which conducts heat better, DMLS 17-4PH Stainless Steel or Steel AISI 4340?
Steel AISI 4340 conducts heat better: 37.5 W/m·K against 17.9 W/m·K for DMLS 17-4PH Stainless Steel.
Which expands less with temperature?
DMLS 17-4PH Stainless Steel expands less: 10.4 µm/m·K against 11.3 µm/m·K for Steel AISI 4340.
Among 59 materials
Related comparisons
- DMLS 17-4PH Stainless Steel vs. Nickel Inconel 718
- DMLS 17-4PH Stainless Steel vs. Stainless 17-4PH
- DMLS 17-4PH Stainless Steel vs. Steel AISI 1045
- DMLS 17-4PH Stainless Steel vs. DMLS 316L Stainless Steel
- Steel AISI 4340 vs. Nickel Inconel 718
- Steel AISI 4340 vs. Stainless 17-4PH
- Steel AISI 4340 vs. Steel AISI 1045
- Steel AISI 4340 vs. DMLS 316L Stainless Steel