Materials / Compare
DMLS 316L Stainless Steel vs. Steel AISI 4340
Compare DMLS 316L Stainless Steel vs. Steel AISI 4340 strength, stiffness, weight and thermal properties.
| Try it on a partA bracket to run stress or thermal on, free in your browser | Open in LessCAD | Open in LessCAD |
|---|---|---|
| Mechanical | ||
| Yield strength | 530MPasourcetypical, as manufactured, horizontal | 1,035MPasourcetypical, transverse |
| Ultimate tensile strength | 640MPasourcetypical, as manufactured, horizontal | 1,140MPasourcetypical, transverse |
| Elongation at break | 40%sourcetypical at break, as manufactured, horizontal | 18%sourcetypical, transverse |
| Young's modulus (stiffness) | 185GPasourcetypical, as built, horizontal (XY); EOSINT M280-400W / M290-400W, 316L_Surface 1.0, 20 µm (2014 sheet) | 200GPasourceMIL-HDBK-5J design value (AISI 4340, quenched and tempered) |
| Density | 7,900kg/m³sourcepart density (ISO 3369, not labelled min or typical), EOS M 290, 40 µm FlexLine | 7,840kg/m³sourcetypical |
| Strength to weight | 67.1kN·m/kg | 132kN·m/kg1.97x higher |
| Stiffness to weight | 23.4MN·m/kg | 25.5MN·m/kg9% higher |
| Poisson's ratio | 0.3sourcebase material: austenitic stainless steels incl. 1.4404 (316L), design value | 0.32sourceMIL-HDBK-5J design value (AISI 4340, quenched and tempered) |
| Shear modulus | 71.2GPa | 75.7GPa6% stiffer in shear |
| Bulk modulus | 154GPa | 185GPa |
| Speed of sound | 4,839m/s | 5,049m/s |
| Thermal | ||
| Thermal conductivity | 16.2W/m·Ksourcebase material: wrought 316/316L (Cleveland-Cliffs), at 100 °C | 37.5W/m·Ksourcetypical |
| Thermal expansion | 15.7µm/m·Ksourcemean 25-100 °C, ASTM E228 | 11.3µm/m·Ksourcemean, -18 to 93 °C |
| 100 mm part over a 50 °C swing | 78.6µm growth | 56.5µm growth39% less |
| Specific heat | 500J/kg·Ksourcebase material: wrought 316/316L (Cleveland-Cliffs), 0-100 °C | 448J/kg·Ksourcetypical |
| Heats up and cools (diffusivity) | 4.1mm²/s | 10.7mm²/s2.6x faster |
| Thermal shock resistance | 2,067W/m | 11,678W/m5.65x more resistant |
| Values for | EOS StainlessSteel 316L (powder 9011-0032), EOS M 290, ParameterSet 316L 20µm Surface M290/400W, as manufactured, horizontal; ISO 6892-1 | Carpenter (Latrobe) Lescalloy 4340 VAC-ARC datasheet; mechanical row for 1100 °F temper; physical properties grade-level |
Every value links to the document that states it. "Not sourced" means no citable source states it (or only a specification minimum); figures computed from it are left out too.
DMLS 316L Stainless Steel is 3D printed: its properties depend on build direction and print settings; these are typical values.
Questions
Is DMLS 316L Stainless Steel stronger than Steel AISI 4340?
Steel AISI 4340 is stronger: its yield strength is 1,035 MPa against 530 MPa for DMLS 316L Stainless Steel (1.95x).
Which is lighter, DMLS 316L Stainless Steel or Steel AISI 4340?
Steel AISI 4340 is lighter: 7,840 kg/m³ against 7,900 kg/m³ for DMLS 316L Stainless Steel.
Which is stiffer, DMLS 316L Stainless Steel or Steel AISI 4340?
Steel AISI 4340 is stiffer: Young's modulus 200 GPa against 185 GPa for DMLS 316L Stainless Steel, so the same part in Steel AISI 4340 deflects less under the same load.
Which is lighter for the same job, DMLS 316L Stainless Steel or Steel AISI 4340?
For the same stiffness or strength: Steel AISI 4340 is lighter for a stiff rod or tie (tension), stiff beam (bending), stiff panel or plate, strong rod or tie, strong beam, strong panel or plate.
| Part that must be | DMLS 316L Stainless Steel | Steel AISI 4340 |
|---|---|---|
| Stiff rod or tie (tension) | 9% heavier | lighter |
| Stiff beam (bending) | 5% heavier | lighter |
| Stiff panel or plate | 3% heavier | lighter |
| Strong rod or tie | 1.97x heavier | lighter |
| Strong beam | 1.57x heavier | lighter |
| Strong panel or plate | 41% heavier | lighter |
For the same stiffness or strength, mass scales with density over stiffness (or strength) raised to a power set by how the part is loaded: 1 for a rod in tension, 1/2 for a beam in bending, 1/3 for a panel (the standard material-selection indices).
Which conducts heat better, DMLS 316L Stainless Steel or Steel AISI 4340?
Steel AISI 4340 conducts heat better: 37.5 W/m·K against 16.2 W/m·K for DMLS 316L Stainless Steel.
Which expands less with temperature?
Steel AISI 4340 expands less: 11.3 µm/m·K against 15.7 µm/m·K for DMLS 316L Stainless Steel.
Among 59 materials
Related comparisons
- DMLS 316L Stainless Steel vs. Steel AISI 1045
- DMLS 316L Stainless Steel vs. Steel
- DMLS 316L Stainless Steel vs. Steel A992
- DMLS 316L Stainless Steel vs. Steel AISI 1018
- Steel AISI 4340 vs. Nickel Inconel 718
- Steel AISI 4340 vs. DMLS 17-4PH Stainless Steel
- Steel AISI 4340 vs. Stainless 17-4PH
- Steel AISI 4340 vs. Steel AISI 1045