Materials / Compare

SLA Resin Tough 2000 vs. DMLS Ti-6Al-4V ELI Titanium

Compare SLA Resin Tough 2000 vs. DMLS Ti-6Al-4V ELI Titanium strength, stiffness, weight and thermal properties.

Change either side
SLA Resin Tough 20003D printed (SLA resin)
DMLS Ti-6Al-4V ELI Titanium3D printed metal (DMLS)
Try it on a partA bracket to run stress or thermal on, free in your browserOpen in LessCADOpen in LessCAD
Mechanical
Yield strength40.4MPasourcetypical1,100MPasourcetypical, as built, average of horizontal + vertical (M400)
Ultimate tensile strength40.4MPasourcetypical1,270MPasourcetypical, as built, average of horizontal + vertical (M400)
Flexural strength67MPasourcetypicalnot sourced
Elongation at break79%sourcetypical8.7%sourcetypical at break, as built (M400)
Young's modulus (stiffness)1.8GPasourcetypical110GPasourcesame maker and process, sibling grade: EOS Titanium Ti64 (Grade 5) on EOS M 290, as built, XY and Z, typical
Density1,090kg/m³sourcetypical4,400kg/m³sourcetypical part density (ISO 3369), M400
Strength to weight37.1kN·m/kg250kN·m/kg6.75x higher
Stiffness to weight1.65MN·m/kg25MN·m/kg15.1x higher
Poisson's rationot sourced0.342sourcewrought TIMETAL 6-4 (TIMET measurement, mean of 10); composition-level, not DMLS-measured
Shear modulusnot sourced41GPa
Bulk modulusnot sourced116GPa
Speed of sound1,285m/s5,000m/s
Thermal
Thermal conductivitynot sourced6.6W/m·Ksourcebase material: wrought Ti-6Al-4V / 6-4 ELI (TIMET datasheet), 20 °C
Thermal expansion134µm/m·Ksourcemean 0-150 °C9µm/m·Ksourcemean 25-100 °C, ASTM E228; EOS Ti64 Grade 23 (=ELI) on EOS M 290 40 µm; condition not stated (sheet's mechanical data are heat treated)
100 mm part over a 50 °C swing671µm growth45µm growth14.9x less
Specific heatnot sourced580J/kg·Ksourcebase material: wrought Ti-6Al-4V / 6-4 ELI (TIMET datasheet), 20 °C
Heats up and cools (diffusivity)not sourced2.59mm²/s
Thermal shock resistancenot sourced4,825W/m
Melting pointnot sourced1,630–1,650°Csourcemelting range, wrought TIMETAL 6-4 (composition-level)
Glass transition112°CsourceDMAnot sourced
Max service temperature57°CsourceHDT 1.8 MPanot sourced
Values forFormlabs Tough 2000 Resin V2 (FLTO2002), TDS Rev. 01 10/06/2025; printed on Form 4 at 100 µm, washed in Form Wash V2 10+5 min in >=99% IPA, post-cured 70 °C for 12 min in Form Cure V2. Orientation not stated.EOS Titanium Ti64ELI (powder 9011-0040; ASTM F136/F3001, i.e. Grade 23) on EOS M400 SF, parameter set Ti64ELI_030_FlexM400_100, 30 µm, as built; ISO 6892-1 A14

Every value links to the document that states it. "Not sourced" means no citable source states it (or only a specification minimum); figures computed from it are left out too.

SLA Resin Tough 2000 and DMLS Ti-6Al-4V ELI Titanium are 3D printed: their properties depend on build direction and print settings; these are typical values.

Questions

Is SLA Resin Tough 2000 stronger than DMLS Ti-6Al-4V ELI Titanium?

DMLS Ti-6Al-4V ELI Titanium is stronger: its yield strength is 1,100 MPa against 40.4 MPa for SLA Resin Tough 2000 (27.2x).

Which is lighter, SLA Resin Tough 2000 or DMLS Ti-6Al-4V ELI Titanium?

SLA Resin Tough 2000 is lighter: 1,090 kg/m³ against 4,400 kg/m³ for DMLS Ti-6Al-4V ELI Titanium.

Which is stiffer, SLA Resin Tough 2000 or DMLS Ti-6Al-4V ELI Titanium?

DMLS Ti-6Al-4V ELI Titanium is stiffer: Young's modulus 110 GPa against 1.8 GPa for SLA Resin Tough 2000, so the same part in DMLS Ti-6Al-4V ELI Titanium deflects less under the same load.

Which is lighter for the same job, SLA Resin Tough 2000 or DMLS Ti-6Al-4V ELI Titanium?

For the same stiffness or strength: SLA Resin Tough 2000 is lighter for a stiff panel or plate; DMLS Ti-6Al-4V ELI Titanium is lighter for a stiff rod or tie (tension), stiff beam (bending), strong rod or tie, strong beam, strong panel or plate.

Part that must beSLA Resin Tough 2000DMLS Ti-6Al-4V ELI Titanium
Stiff rod or tie (tension)15.1x heavierlighter
Stiff beam (bending)1.94x heavierlighter
Stiff panel or platelighter2% heavier
Strong rod or tie6.75x heavierlighter
Strong beam2.24x heavierlighter
Strong panel or plate29% heavierlighter

For the same stiffness or strength, mass scales with density over stiffness (or strength) raised to a power set by how the part is loaded: 1 for a rod in tension, 1/2 for a beam in bending, 1/3 for a panel (the standard material-selection indices).

Which expands less with temperature?

DMLS Ti-6Al-4V ELI Titanium expands less: 9 µm/m·K against 134 µm/m·K for SLA Resin Tough 2000.

Among 59 materials

1k10k0.1110100Density (kg/m³)Young's modulus (GPa)Plastic PLAPlastic PETGPlastic ABSPlastic TPUPlastic NylonAluminumSteelIronTitaniumSteel AISI 1018Stainless 304Stainless 316Aluminum 6061-T6Aluminum 7075-T6Brass C360Copper C110GlassSteel AISI 1045Steel AISI 4340Steel A992Stainless 303Stainless 17-4PHAluminum 2024-T351Aluminum 5052-H32Aluminum 7050-T7451Titanium Ti-6Al-4VBrass C260Nickel Inconel 718Magnesium AZ31B-H24Zinc Zamak 3Plastic ABS (bulk/injection)Plastic PolycarbonatePlastic POM/AcetalPlastic Nylon PA6Plastic Nylon PA66Plastic PEEKPlastic UHMWPEPlastic HDPEPlastic PolypropylenePlastic PMMAFDM ASAFDM PolycarbonateFDM PAHT-CFFDM HIPSSLS PA12 NylonDMLS AlSi10Mg AluminumDMLS 316L Stainless SteelDMLS 17-4PH Stainless SteelSLA Resin Tough 2000DMLS Ti-6Al-4V ELI Titanium
Stiffness against density
1k10k101001kDensity (kg/m³)Yield strength (MPa)Plastic PLAPlastic PETGPlastic ABSPlastic TPUPlastic NylonRubberAluminumSteelIronTitaniumSteel AISI 1018Stainless 304Stainless 316Aluminum 6061-T6Aluminum 7075-T6Brass C360Copper C110GlassSteel AISI 1045Steel AISI 4340Steel A992Stainless 303Stainless 17-4PHAluminum 2024-T351Aluminum 5052-H32Aluminum 7050-T7451Titanium Ti-6Al-4VBrass C260Nickel Inconel 718Magnesium AZ31B-H24Zinc Zamak 3Plastic ABS (bulk/injection)Plastic PolycarbonatePlastic POM/AcetalPlastic Nylon PA6Plastic Nylon PA66Plastic PEEKPlastic PTFEPlastic UHMWPEPlastic HDPEPlastic PolypropylenePlastic PMMAFDM ASAFDM PolycarbonateFDM PAHT-CFFDM HIPSSLA Resin Elastic 50ASLS PA12 NylonDMLS AlSi10Mg AluminumDMLS 316L Stainless SteelDMLS 17-4PH Stainless SteelBrickSLA Resin Tough 2000DMLS Ti-6Al-4V ELI Titanium
Strength against density

Related comparisons