Materials / Compare
Plastic ABS (bulk/injection) vs. Nickel Inconel 718
Compare Plastic ABS (bulk/injection) vs. Nickel Inconel 718 strength, stiffness, weight and thermal properties.
| Try it on a partA bracket to run stress or thermal on, free in your browser | Open in LessCAD | Open in LessCAD |
|---|---|---|
| Mechanical | ||
| Yield strength | 45MPasourcetypical, tensile stress at yield 23 °C | 1,207MPasourcetypical, 1.0 in. hot-rolled bar, 0.2% offset |
| Ultimate tensile strength | not sourced | 1,389MPasourcetypical, 1.0 in. bar |
| Flexural strength | 65MPasourcetypical, 23 °C | not sourced |
| Elongation at break | 10%sourcenominal strain at break, 23 °C | 20%sourcetypical, 1.0 in. bar |
| Young's modulus (stiffness) | 2.3GPasourcetypical | 200GPasourcetypical, 21 °C, annealed + aged |
| Density | 1,040kg/m³sourcetypical | 8,221kg/m³sourcenominal, annealed and aged |
| Strength to weight | 43.3kN·m/kg | 147kN·m/kg3.39x higher |
| Stiffness to weight | 2.21MN·m/kg | 24.3MN·m/kg11x higher |
| Poisson's ratio | 0.39sourcetypical, ABS family (Covestro Part and Mold Design guide, Table 3-1) | 0.294sourcetypical, 21 °C, annealed + aged |
| Shear modulus | 0.827GPa | 77.3GPa93.4x stiffer in shear |
| Bulk modulus | 3.48GPa | 162GPa |
| Speed of sound | 1,487m/s | 4,932m/s |
| Thermal | ||
| Thermal conductivity | 0.17W/m·Ksourcetypical | 11.4W/m·Ksourcetypical, 21 °C, annealed + aged (calculated from resistivity per footnote a) |
| Thermal expansion | 80–110µm/m·Ksourcerange | 13.2µm/m·Ksourcetypical, mean 21-93 °C, annealed + aged |
| 100 mm part over a 50 °C swing | 475µm growth | 66µm growth7.2x less |
| Specific heat | not sourced | 435J/kg·Ksourcetypical, 21 °C |
| Heats up and cools (diffusivity) | not sourced | 3.19mm²/s |
| Thermal shock resistance | 21.4W/m | 3,680W/m172x more resistant |
| Melting point | not sourced | 1,260–1,336°Csourcemelting range |
| Max service temperature | 94°CsourceHDT 1.8 MPa (annealed 4 h/80 °C) | 704°Csourceupper use temperature stated by producer |
| Values for | INEOS Styrolution Terluran GP-22 general-purpose injection-molding ABS, ISO typical values (TDS revision 08/01/2022) | INCONEL alloy 718, standard grade, 1750 °F/1 hr anneal + 1325 °F/8 hr F.C. to 1150 °F aged; Special Metals bulletin SMC-045 typical values |
Every value links to the document that states it. "Not sourced" means no citable source states it (or only a specification minimum); figures computed from it are left out too.
Questions
Is Plastic ABS (bulk/injection) stronger than Nickel Inconel 718?
Nickel Inconel 718 is stronger: its yield strength is 1,207 MPa against 45 MPa for Plastic ABS (bulk/injection) (26.8x).
Which is lighter, Plastic ABS (bulk/injection) or Nickel Inconel 718?
Plastic ABS (bulk/injection) is lighter: 1,040 kg/m³ against 8,221 kg/m³ for Nickel Inconel 718.
Which is stiffer, Plastic ABS (bulk/injection) or Nickel Inconel 718?
Nickel Inconel 718 is stiffer: Young's modulus 200 GPa against 2.3 GPa for Plastic ABS (bulk/injection), so the same part in Nickel Inconel 718 deflects less under the same load.
Which is lighter for the same job, Plastic ABS (bulk/injection) or Nickel Inconel 718?
For the same stiffness or strength: Plastic ABS (bulk/injection) is lighter for a stiff panel or plate, strong panel or plate; Nickel Inconel 718 is lighter for a stiff rod or tie (tension), stiff beam (bending), strong rod or tie, strong beam.
| Part that must be | Plastic ABS (bulk/injection) | Nickel Inconel 718 |
|---|---|---|
| Stiff rod or tie (tension) | 11x heavier | lighter |
| Stiff beam (bending) | 18% heavier | lighter |
| Stiff panel or plate | lighter | 1.78x heavier |
| Strong rod or tie | 3.39x heavier | lighter |
| Strong beam | 13% heavier | lighter |
| Strong panel or plate | lighter | 1.53x heavier |
For the same stiffness or strength, mass scales with density over stiffness (or strength) raised to a power set by how the part is loaded: 1 for a rod in tension, 1/2 for a beam in bending, 1/3 for a panel (the standard material-selection indices).
Which conducts heat better, Plastic ABS (bulk/injection) or Nickel Inconel 718?
Nickel Inconel 718 conducts heat better: 11.4 W/m·K against 0.17 W/m·K for Plastic ABS (bulk/injection).
Which expands less with temperature?
Nickel Inconel 718 expands less: 13.2 µm/m·K against 95 µm/m·K for Plastic ABS (bulk/injection).
Among 59 materials
Related comparisons
- Plastic ABS (bulk/injection) vs. FDM ASA
- Plastic ABS (bulk/injection) vs. FDM Polycarbonate
- Plastic ABS (bulk/injection) vs. Plastic ABS
- Plastic ABS (bulk/injection) vs. Plastic PETG
- Nickel Inconel 718 vs. Stainless 17-4PH
- Nickel Inconel 718 vs. Steel AISI 4340
- Nickel Inconel 718 vs. DMLS 17-4PH Stainless Steel
- Nickel Inconel 718 vs. Steel AISI 1045