Materials / Compare
Plastic ABS vs. Stainless 17-4PH
Compare Plastic ABS vs. Stainless 17-4PH strength, stiffness, weight and thermal properties.
| Try it on a partA bracket to run stress or thermal on, free in your browser | Open in LessCAD | Open in LessCAD |
|---|---|---|
| Mechanical | ||
| Yield strength | 38.1MPasourcetypical | 1,275MPasourcetypical, transverse, sheet/strip |
| Ultimate tensile strength | 38.1MPasourcetypical, peak stress (= stress at yield) | 1,379MPasourcetypical, transverse, sheet/strip |
| Flexural strength | 61.1MPasourcetypical | not sourced |
| Elongation at break | 4.6%sourcetypical | 9%sourcetypical, transverse, in 2 in. (50.8 mm) |
| Young's modulus (stiffness) | 1.96GPasourcetypical | 197GPasourceH 900 |
| Density | 1,100kg/m³sourcetypical | 7,800kg/m³sourceH 900 |
| Strength to weight | 34.6kN·m/kg | 163kN·m/kg4.72x higher |
| Stiffness to weight | 1.78MN·m/kg | 25.3MN·m/kg14.2x higher |
| Poisson's ratio | 0.39sourcebase material: ABS family typical (Covestro Part and Mold Design guide, Table 3-1) | 0.272sourceH 900 (column) |
| Shear modulus | 0.706GPa | 77.4GPa110x stiffer in shear |
| Bulk modulus | 2.97GPa | 144GPa |
| Speed of sound | 1,336m/s | 5,026m/s |
| Thermal | ||
| Thermal conductivity | 0.17W/m·Ksourcebase material: INEOS Styrolution Terluran GP-22 injection-molding ABS, typical | 17.9W/m·Ksourceat 149 °C (300 °F), H 900 |
| Thermal expansion | 80–110µm/m·Ksourcebase material: INEOS Styrolution Terluran GP-22 injection-molding ABS, range | 10.8µm/m·Ksourcemean, 21–93 °C (70–200 °F), H 900 |
| 100 mm part over a 50 °C swing | 475µm growth | 54µm growth8.8x less |
| Specific heat | not sourced | 460J/kg·Ksourcemean, 0–100 °C, H 900 |
| Heats up and cools (diffusivity) | not sourced | 4.99mm²/s |
| Thermal shock resistance | 21.2W/m | 7,809W/m368x more resistant |
| Glass transition | 101°Csourcetypical | not sourced |
| Max service temperature | 86.6°CsourceHDT 0.455 MPa (printed specimens) | 316°Csourcestrength-retention limit (not oxidation) |
| Values for | Ultimaker ABS, 3D-printed specimens, XY (flat); Ultimaker S5 Pro, engineering intent profile, 0.15 mm layer height, AA 0.4 print core, 100% infill, Cura 4.9, printed one-at-a-time, conditioned >=24 h at room temperature. TDS v5.00, April 20, 2022. | Cleveland-Cliffs 17-4 PH, Condition H 900, sheet/strip, transverse (Product Data Bulletin, May 2021) |
Every value links to the document that states it. "Not sourced" means no citable source states it (or only a specification minimum); figures computed from it are left out too.
Plastic ABS is 3D printed: its properties depend on build direction and print settings; these are typical values.
Questions
Is Plastic ABS stronger than Stainless 17-4PH?
Stainless 17-4PH is stronger: its yield strength is 1,275 MPa against 38.1 MPa for Plastic ABS (33.5x).
Which is lighter, Plastic ABS or Stainless 17-4PH?
Plastic ABS is lighter: 1,100 kg/m³ against 7,800 kg/m³ for Stainless 17-4PH.
Which is stiffer, Plastic ABS or Stainless 17-4PH?
Stainless 17-4PH is stiffer: Young's modulus 197 GPa against 1.96 GPa for Plastic ABS, so the same part in Stainless 17-4PH deflects less under the same load.
Which is lighter for the same job, Plastic ABS or Stainless 17-4PH?
For the same stiffness or strength: Plastic ABS is lighter for a stiff panel or plate, strong panel or plate; Stainless 17-4PH is lighter for a stiff rod or tie (tension), stiff beam (bending), strong rod or tie, strong beam.
| Part that must be | Plastic ABS | Stainless 17-4PH |
|---|---|---|
| Stiff rod or tie (tension) | 14.2x heavier | lighter |
| Stiff beam (bending) | 41% heavier | lighter |
| Stiff panel or plate | lighter | 1.53x heavier |
| Strong rod or tie | 4.72x heavier | lighter |
| Strong beam | 46% heavier | lighter |
| Strong panel or plate | lighter | 23% heavier |
For the same stiffness or strength, mass scales with density over stiffness (or strength) raised to a power set by how the part is loaded: 1 for a rod in tension, 1/2 for a beam in bending, 1/3 for a panel (the standard material-selection indices).
Which conducts heat better, Plastic ABS or Stainless 17-4PH?
Stainless 17-4PH conducts heat better: 17.9 W/m·K against 0.17 W/m·K for Plastic ABS.
Which expands less with temperature?
Stainless 17-4PH expands less: 10.8 µm/m·K against 95 µm/m·K for Plastic ABS.
Among 59 materials
Related comparisons
- Plastic ABS vs. SLA Resin Tough 2000
- Plastic ABS vs. FDM ASA
- Plastic ABS vs. Plastic ABS (bulk/injection)
- Plastic ABS vs. Plastic PETG
- Stainless 17-4PH vs. Nickel Inconel 718
- Stainless 17-4PH vs. Steel AISI 4340
- Stainless 17-4PH vs. DMLS 17-4PH Stainless Steel
- Stainless 17-4PH vs. DMLS Ti-6Al-4V ELI Titanium