Materials / Compare

Aluminum 5052-H32 vs. Steel AISI 1018

Compare Aluminum 5052-H32 vs. Steel AISI 1018 strength, stiffness, weight and thermal properties.

Change either side
Aluminum 5052-H32Wrought
Steel AISI 1018Wrought
Try it on a partA bracket to run stress or thermal on, free in your browserOpen in LessCADOpen in LessCAD
Mechanical
Yield strength195MPasourcetypical, 0.2% offset372MPasourceproducer-stated, cold drawn
Ultimate tensile strength230MPasourcetypical441MPasourceproducer-stated, cold drawn
Elongation at break12%sourcetypical15%sourcein 2 in (50.8 mm)
Young's modulus (stiffness)70GPasourcetypical200GPasourcebase material: AISI 1025 plain carbon steel (MIL-HDBK-5J design value; ASTM A108 bar is the cold-finished carbon-steel bar spec that also covers 1018)
Density2,685kg/m³sourcenominal7,861kg/m³sourcebase material: AISI 1025 plain carbon steel (MIL-HDBK-5J design value; ASTM A108 bar is the cold-finished carbon-steel bar spec that also covers 1018)
Strength to weight72.6kN·m/kg1.53x higher47.3kN·m/kg
Stiffness to weight26.1MN·m/kg3% higher25.4MN·m/kg
Poisson's ratio0.33sourcetypical (handbook physical constant)0.32sourcebase material: AISI 1025 plain carbon steel (MIL-HDBK-5J design value; ASTM A108 bar is the cold-finished carbon-steel bar spec that also covers 1018)
Shear modulus26.3GPa75.7GPa2.88x stiffer in shear
Bulk modulus68.6GPa185GPa
Speed of sound5,106m/s5,043m/s
Thermal
Thermal conductivity138W/m·Ksourcebase material: 5052 in O temper (same alloy, annealed); Kaiser typical51.9W/m·Ksourcebase material: AISI 1025 plain carbon steel (MIL-HDBK-5J design value; ASTM A108 bar is the cold-finished carbon-steel bar spec that also covers 1018)
Thermal expansion23.8µm/m·Ksourcetypical, mean 20-100 °C12µm/m·Ksourcebase material: unalloyed carbon steel, Ovako family table (S275JR, 'none alloyed structural steels', C <= 0.21%); mean 20-300 °C
100 mm part over a 50 °C swing119µm growth60µm growth1.98x less
Specific heat963J/kg·Ksourceat 100 °C (212 °F); table covers O, H32, H34, H36, H38486J/kg·Ksourcebase material: AISI 1025 plain carbon steel (MIL-HDBK-5J design value; ASTM A108 bar is the cold-finished carbon-steel bar spec that also covers 1018)
Heats up and cools (diffusivity)53.4mm²/s3.93x faster13.6mm²/s
Thermal shock resistance10,822W/m1.98x more resistant5,473W/m
Melting point605–650°Csourcemelting rangenot sourced
Values for5052-H32, Kaiser Aluminum tube & pipe typical datasheet (mechanical, CTE, melting); MIL-HDBK-5J (Poisson, density, specific heat)AISI 1018 cold drawn bar (Niagara LaSalle, cold-finished bar producer)

Every value links to the document that states it. "Not sourced" means no citable source states it (or only a specification minimum); figures computed from it are left out too.

Questions

Is Aluminum 5052-H32 stronger than Steel AISI 1018?

Steel AISI 1018 is stronger: its yield strength is 372 MPa against 195 MPa for Aluminum 5052-H32 (1.91x).

Which is lighter, Aluminum 5052-H32 or Steel AISI 1018?

Aluminum 5052-H32 is lighter: 2,685 kg/m³ against 7,861 kg/m³ for Steel AISI 1018.

Which is stiffer, Aluminum 5052-H32 or Steel AISI 1018?

Steel AISI 1018 is stiffer: Young's modulus 200 GPa against 70 GPa for Aluminum 5052-H32, so the same part in Steel AISI 1018 deflects less under the same load.

Which is lighter for the same job, Aluminum 5052-H32 or Steel AISI 1018?

For the same stiffness or strength: Aluminum 5052-H32 is lighter for a stiff rod or tie (tension), stiff beam (bending), stiff panel or plate, strong rod or tie, strong beam, strong panel or plate.

Part that must beAluminum 5052-H32Steel AISI 1018
Stiff rod or tie (tension)lighter3% heavier
Stiff beam (bending)lighter1.73x heavier
Stiff panel or platelighter2.06x heavier
Strong rod or tielighter1.53x heavier
Strong beamlighter1.9x heavier
Strong panel or platelighter2.12x heavier

For the same stiffness or strength, mass scales with density over stiffness (or strength) raised to a power set by how the part is loaded: 1 for a rod in tension, 1/2 for a beam in bending, 1/3 for a panel (the standard material-selection indices).

Which conducts heat better, Aluminum 5052-H32 or Steel AISI 1018?

Aluminum 5052-H32 conducts heat better: 138 W/m·K against 51.9 W/m·K for Steel AISI 1018.

Which expands less with temperature?

Steel AISI 1018 expands less: 12 µm/m·K against 23.8 µm/m·K for Aluminum 5052-H32.

Among 59 materials

1k10k0.1110100Density (kg/m³)Young's modulus (GPa)Plastic PLAPlastic PETGPlastic ABSPlastic TPUPlastic NylonAluminumSteelIronTitaniumStainless 304Stainless 316Aluminum 6061-T6Aluminum 7075-T6Brass C360Copper C110GlassSteel AISI 1045Steel AISI 4340Steel A992Stainless 303Stainless 17-4PHAluminum 2024-T351Aluminum 7050-T7451Titanium Ti-6Al-4VBrass C260Nickel Inconel 718Magnesium AZ31B-H24Zinc Zamak 3Plastic ABS (bulk/injection)Plastic PolycarbonatePlastic POM/AcetalPlastic Nylon PA6Plastic Nylon PA66Plastic PEEKPlastic UHMWPEPlastic HDPEPlastic PolypropylenePlastic PMMAFDM ASAFDM PolycarbonateFDM PAHT-CFFDM HIPSSLA Resin Tough 2000SLS PA12 NylonDMLS AlSi10Mg AluminumDMLS Ti-6Al-4V ELI TitaniumDMLS 316L Stainless SteelDMLS 17-4PH Stainless SteelAluminum 5052-H32Steel AISI 1018
Stiffness against density
1k10k101001kDensity (kg/m³)Yield strength (MPa)Plastic PLAPlastic PETGPlastic ABSPlastic TPUPlastic NylonRubberAluminumSteelIronTitaniumStainless 304Stainless 316Aluminum 6061-T6Aluminum 7075-T6Brass C360Copper C110GlassSteel AISI 1045Steel AISI 4340Steel A992Stainless 303Stainless 17-4PHAluminum 2024-T351Aluminum 7050-T7451Titanium Ti-6Al-4VBrass C260Nickel Inconel 718Magnesium AZ31B-H24Zinc Zamak 3Plastic ABS (bulk/injection)Plastic PolycarbonatePlastic POM/AcetalPlastic Nylon PA6Plastic Nylon PA66Plastic PEEKPlastic PTFEPlastic UHMWPEPlastic HDPEPlastic PolypropylenePlastic PMMAFDM ASAFDM PolycarbonateFDM PAHT-CFFDM HIPSSLA Resin Tough 2000SLA Resin Elastic 50ASLS PA12 NylonDMLS AlSi10Mg AluminumDMLS Ti-6Al-4V ELI TitaniumDMLS 316L Stainless SteelDMLS 17-4PH Stainless SteelBrickAluminum 5052-H32Steel AISI 1018
Strength against density

Related comparisons