Materials / Compare

Aluminum 6061-T6 vs. Plastic Polypropylene

Compare Aluminum 6061-T6 vs. Plastic Polypropylene strength, stiffness, weight and thermal properties.

Change either side
Aluminum 6061-T6Wrought
Plastic PolypropyleneBulk polymer (molded or machined)
Try it on a partA bracket to run stress or thermal on, free in your browserOpen in LessCADOpen in LessCAD
Mechanical
Yield strength276MPasourcetypical, 0.2% offset, .500 in dia specimen33MPasourcetypical, tensile stress at yield ISO 527
Ultimate tensile strength310MPasourcetypicalnot sourced
Elongation at break17%sourcetypical, in 4D, 0.500 in dia specimennot sourced
Young's modulus (stiffness)68.3GPasourcetypical1.45GPasourcetypical, tensile modulus ISO 527
Density2,700kg/m³sourcenominal900kg/m³sourcetypical, 23 °C ISO 1183-1
Strength to weight102kN·m/kg2.79x higher36.7kN·m/kg
Stiffness to weight25.3MN·m/kg15.7x higher1.61MN·m/kg
Poisson's ratio0.33sourcetypical (handbook physical constant)0.42sourcebase material: polypropylene homopolymer family (INEOS Olefins & Polymers USA, Typical Engineering Properties of Polypropylene)
Shear modulus25.7GPa50.3x stiffer in shear0.511GPa
Bulk modulus67GPa3.02GPa
Speed of sound5,030m/s1,269m/s
Thermal
Thermal conductivity167W/m·Ksourcetypical, 20 °C0.17–0.22W/m·Ksourcebase material: polypropylene homopolymer family (INEOS Olefins & Polymers USA, Typical Engineering Properties of Polypropylene)
Thermal expansion23.6µm/m·Ksourcetypical, mean 20-100 °C80–100µm/m·Ksourcebase material: polypropylene homopolymer family (INEOS Olefins & Polymers USA, Typical Engineering Properties of Polypropylene)
100 mm part over a 50 °C swing118µm growth3.81x less450µm growth
Specific heat896J/kg·Ksourcetypical, at 100 °Cnot sourced
Heats up and cools (diffusivity)69mm²/snot sourced
Thermal shock resistance19,159W/m670x more resistant28.6W/m
Melting point582–652°Csourcesolidus-liquidusnot sourced
Max service temperaturenot sourced90°CsourceHDT 0.45 MPa (ISO 75B), unannealed
Values for6061-T6/T651, Kaiser Aluminum typical properties; Poisson from MIL-HDBK-5JLyondellBasell Moplen HP501H polypropylene homopolymer (general purpose), typical ISO values

Every value links to the document that states it. "Not sourced" means no citable source states it (or only a specification minimum); figures computed from it are left out too.

Questions

Is Aluminum 6061-T6 stronger than Plastic Polypropylene?

Aluminum 6061-T6 is stronger: its yield strength is 276 MPa against 33 MPa for Plastic Polypropylene (8.36x).

Which is lighter, Aluminum 6061-T6 or Plastic Polypropylene?

Plastic Polypropylene is lighter: 900 kg/m³ against 2,700 kg/m³ for Aluminum 6061-T6.

Which is stiffer, Aluminum 6061-T6 or Plastic Polypropylene?

Aluminum 6061-T6 is stiffer: Young's modulus 68.3 GPa against 1.45 GPa for Plastic Polypropylene, so the same part in Aluminum 6061-T6 deflects less under the same load.

Which is lighter for the same job, Aluminum 6061-T6 or Plastic Polypropylene?

For the same stiffness or strength: Aluminum 6061-T6 is lighter for a stiff rod or tie (tension), stiff beam (bending), stiff panel or plate, strong rod or tie, strong beam; Plastic Polypropylene is lighter for a strong panel or plate.

Part that must beAluminum 6061-T6Plastic Polypropylene
Stiff rod or tie (tension)lighter15.7x heavier
Stiff beam (bending)lighter2.29x heavier
Stiff panel or platelighter20% heavier
Strong rod or tielighter2.79x heavier
Strong beamlighter37% heavier
Strong panel or plate4% heavierlighter

For the same stiffness or strength, mass scales with density over stiffness (or strength) raised to a power set by how the part is loaded: 1 for a rod in tension, 1/2 for a beam in bending, 1/3 for a panel (the standard material-selection indices).

Which conducts heat better, Aluminum 6061-T6 or Plastic Polypropylene?

Aluminum 6061-T6 conducts heat better: 167 W/m·K against 0.195 W/m·K for Plastic Polypropylene.

Which expands less with temperature?

Aluminum 6061-T6 expands less: 23.6 µm/m·K against 90 µm/m·K for Plastic Polypropylene.

Among 59 materials

1k10k0.1110100Density (kg/m³)Young's modulus (GPa)Plastic PLAPlastic PETGPlastic ABSPlastic TPUPlastic NylonAluminumSteelIronTitaniumSteel AISI 1018Stainless 304Stainless 316Aluminum 7075-T6Brass C360Copper C110GlassSteel AISI 1045Steel AISI 4340Steel A992Stainless 303Stainless 17-4PHAluminum 2024-T351Aluminum 5052-H32Aluminum 7050-T7451Titanium Ti-6Al-4VBrass C260Nickel Inconel 718Magnesium AZ31B-H24Zinc Zamak 3Plastic ABS (bulk/injection)Plastic PolycarbonatePlastic POM/AcetalPlastic Nylon PA6Plastic Nylon PA66Plastic PEEKPlastic UHMWPEPlastic HDPEPlastic PMMAFDM ASAFDM PolycarbonateFDM PAHT-CFFDM HIPSSLA Resin Tough 2000SLS PA12 NylonDMLS AlSi10Mg AluminumDMLS Ti-6Al-4V ELI TitaniumDMLS 316L Stainless SteelDMLS 17-4PH Stainless SteelAluminum 6061-T6Plastic Polypropylene
Stiffness against density
1k10k101001kDensity (kg/m³)Yield strength (MPa)Plastic PLAPlastic PETGPlastic ABSPlastic TPUPlastic NylonRubberAluminumSteelIronTitaniumSteel AISI 1018Stainless 304Stainless 316Aluminum 7075-T6Brass C360Copper C110GlassSteel AISI 1045Steel AISI 4340Steel A992Stainless 303Stainless 17-4PHAluminum 2024-T351Aluminum 5052-H32Aluminum 7050-T7451Titanium Ti-6Al-4VBrass C260Nickel Inconel 718Magnesium AZ31B-H24Zinc Zamak 3Plastic ABS (bulk/injection)Plastic PolycarbonatePlastic POM/AcetalPlastic Nylon PA6Plastic Nylon PA66Plastic PEEKPlastic PTFEPlastic UHMWPEPlastic HDPEPlastic PMMAFDM ASAFDM PolycarbonateFDM PAHT-CFFDM HIPSSLA Resin Tough 2000SLA Resin Elastic 50ASLS PA12 NylonDMLS AlSi10Mg AluminumDMLS Ti-6Al-4V ELI TitaniumDMLS 316L Stainless SteelDMLS 17-4PH Stainless SteelBrickAluminum 6061-T6Plastic Polypropylene
Strength against density

Related comparisons