Materials / Compare
Aluminum 7050-T7451 vs. Plastic Polypropylene
Compare Aluminum 7050-T7451 vs. Plastic Polypropylene strength, stiffness, weight and thermal properties.
| Try it on a partA bracket to run stress or thermal on, free in your browser | Open in LessCAD | Open in LessCAD |
|---|---|---|
| Mechanical | ||
| Yield strength | 469MPasourcetypical, longitudinal, 0.2% offset | 33MPasourcetypical, tensile stress at yield ISO 527 |
| Ultimate tensile strength | 524MPasourcetypical, longitudinal | not sourced |
| Elongation at break | 11%sourcetypical, longitudinal | not sourced |
| Young's modulus (stiffness) | 70.3GPasourcetypical | 1.45GPasourcetypical, tensile modulus ISO 527 |
| Density | 2,830kg/m³sourcenominal | 900kg/m³sourcetypical, 23 °C ISO 1183-1 |
| Strength to weight | 166kN·m/kg4.52x higher | 36.7kN·m/kg |
| Stiffness to weight | 24.8MN·m/kg15.4x higher | 1.61MN·m/kg |
| Poisson's ratio | 0.33sourcetypical (handbook physical constant) | 0.42sourcebase material: polypropylene homopolymer family (INEOS Olefins & Polymers USA, Typical Engineering Properties of Polypropylene) |
| Shear modulus | 26.4GPa51.8x stiffer in shear | 0.511GPa |
| Bulk modulus | 68.9GPa | 3.02GPa |
| Speed of sound | 4,984m/s | 1,269m/s |
| Thermal | ||
| Thermal conductivity | 157W/m·Ksourcetypical, 20 °C | 0.17–0.22W/m·Ksourcebase material: polypropylene homopolymer family (INEOS Olefins & Polymers USA, Typical Engineering Properties of Polypropylene) |
| Thermal expansion | 23.5µm/m·Ksourcetypical, mean 20-100 °C | 80–100µm/m·Ksourcebase material: polypropylene homopolymer family (INEOS Olefins & Polymers USA, Typical Engineering Properties of Polypropylene) |
| 100 mm part over a 50 °C swing | 118µm growth3.83x less | 450µm growth |
| Specific heat | 860J/kg·Ksourcetypical, at 100 °C | not sourced |
| Heats up and cools (diffusivity) | 64.5mm²/s | not sourced |
| Thermal shock resistance | 29,862W/m1,044x more resistant | 28.6W/m |
| Melting point | 524–635°Csourcemelting range | not sourced |
| Max service temperature | not sourced | 90°CsourceHDT 0.45 MPa (ISO 75B), unannealed |
| Values for | 7050-T7451 plate, Kaiser Aluminum sheet, coil & plate typical datasheet (longitudinal); Poisson from MIL-HDBK-5J | LyondellBasell Moplen HP501H polypropylene homopolymer (general purpose), typical ISO values |
Every value links to the document that states it. "Not sourced" means no citable source states it (or only a specification minimum); figures computed from it are left out too.
Questions
Is Aluminum 7050-T7451 stronger than Plastic Polypropylene?
Aluminum 7050-T7451 is stronger: its yield strength is 469 MPa against 33 MPa for Plastic Polypropylene (14.2x).
Which is lighter, Aluminum 7050-T7451 or Plastic Polypropylene?
Plastic Polypropylene is lighter: 900 kg/m³ against 2,830 kg/m³ for Aluminum 7050-T7451.
Which is stiffer, Aluminum 7050-T7451 or Plastic Polypropylene?
Aluminum 7050-T7451 is stiffer: Young's modulus 70.3 GPa against 1.45 GPa for Plastic Polypropylene, so the same part in Aluminum 7050-T7451 deflects less under the same load.
Which is lighter for the same job, Aluminum 7050-T7451 or Plastic Polypropylene?
For the same stiffness or strength: Aluminum 7050-T7451 is lighter for a stiff rod or tie (tension), stiff beam (bending), stiff panel or plate, strong rod or tie, strong beam, strong panel or plate.
| Part that must be | Aluminum 7050-T7451 | Plastic Polypropylene |
|---|---|---|
| Stiff rod or tie (tension) | lighter | 15.4x heavier |
| Stiff beam (bending) | lighter | 2.21x heavier |
| Stiff panel or plate | lighter | 16% heavier |
| Strong rod or tie | lighter | 4.52x heavier |
| Strong beam | lighter | 1.87x heavier |
| Strong panel or plate | lighter | 20% heavier |
For the same stiffness or strength, mass scales with density over stiffness (or strength) raised to a power set by how the part is loaded: 1 for a rod in tension, 1/2 for a beam in bending, 1/3 for a panel (the standard material-selection indices).
Which conducts heat better, Aluminum 7050-T7451 or Plastic Polypropylene?
Aluminum 7050-T7451 conducts heat better: 157 W/m·K against 0.195 W/m·K for Plastic Polypropylene.
Which expands less with temperature?
Aluminum 7050-T7451 expands less: 23.5 µm/m·K against 90 µm/m·K for Plastic Polypropylene.
Among 59 materials
Related comparisons
- Aluminum 7050-T7451 vs. Aluminum 7075-T6
- Aluminum 7050-T7451 vs. Concrete
- Aluminum 7050-T7451 vs. Aluminum 2024-T351
- Aluminum 7050-T7451 vs. Aluminum
- Plastic Polypropylene vs. SLA Resin Tough 2000
- Plastic Polypropylene vs. Plastic ABS
- Plastic Polypropylene vs. SLS PA12 Nylon
- Plastic Polypropylene vs. Rubber