Materials / Compare

Aluminum 7050-T7451 vs. Steel AISI 1018

Compare Aluminum 7050-T7451 vs. Steel AISI 1018 strength, stiffness, weight and thermal properties.

Change either side
Aluminum 7050-T7451Wrought
Steel AISI 1018Wrought
Try it on a partA bracket to run stress or thermal on, free in your browserOpen in LessCADOpen in LessCAD
Mechanical
Yield strength469MPasourcetypical, longitudinal, 0.2% offset372MPasourceproducer-stated, cold drawn
Ultimate tensile strength524MPasourcetypical, longitudinal441MPasourceproducer-stated, cold drawn
Elongation at break11%sourcetypical, longitudinal15%sourcein 2 in (50.8 mm)
Young's modulus (stiffness)70.3GPasourcetypical200GPasourcebase material: AISI 1025 plain carbon steel (MIL-HDBK-5J design value; ASTM A108 bar is the cold-finished carbon-steel bar spec that also covers 1018)
Density2,830kg/m³sourcenominal7,861kg/m³sourcebase material: AISI 1025 plain carbon steel (MIL-HDBK-5J design value; ASTM A108 bar is the cold-finished carbon-steel bar spec that also covers 1018)
Strength to weight166kN·m/kg3.5x higher47.3kN·m/kg
Stiffness to weight24.8MN·m/kg25.4MN·m/kg2% higher
Poisson's ratio0.33sourcetypical (handbook physical constant)0.32sourcebase material: AISI 1025 plain carbon steel (MIL-HDBK-5J design value; ASTM A108 bar is the cold-finished carbon-steel bar spec that also covers 1018)
Shear modulus26.4GPa75.7GPa2.87x stiffer in shear
Bulk modulus68.9GPa185GPa
Speed of sound4,984m/s5,043m/s
Thermal
Thermal conductivity157W/m·Ksourcetypical, 20 °C51.9W/m·Ksourcebase material: AISI 1025 plain carbon steel (MIL-HDBK-5J design value; ASTM A108 bar is the cold-finished carbon-steel bar spec that also covers 1018)
Thermal expansion23.5µm/m·Ksourcetypical, mean 20-100 °C12µm/m·Ksourcebase material: unalloyed carbon steel, Ovako family table (S275JR, 'none alloyed structural steels', C <= 0.21%); mean 20-300 °C
100 mm part over a 50 °C swing118µm growth60µm growth1.96x less
Specific heat860J/kg·Ksourcetypical, at 100 °C486J/kg·Ksourcebase material: AISI 1025 plain carbon steel (MIL-HDBK-5J design value; ASTM A108 bar is the cold-finished carbon-steel bar spec that also covers 1018)
Heats up and cools (diffusivity)64.5mm²/s4.75x faster13.6mm²/s
Thermal shock resistance29,862W/m5.46x more resistant5,473W/m
Melting point524–635°Csourcemelting rangenot sourced
Values for7050-T7451 plate, Kaiser Aluminum sheet, coil & plate typical datasheet (longitudinal); Poisson from MIL-HDBK-5JAISI 1018 cold drawn bar (Niagara LaSalle, cold-finished bar producer)

Every value links to the document that states it. "Not sourced" means no citable source states it (or only a specification minimum); figures computed from it are left out too.

Questions

Is Aluminum 7050-T7451 stronger than Steel AISI 1018?

Aluminum 7050-T7451 is stronger: its yield strength is 469 MPa against 372 MPa for Steel AISI 1018 (26%).

Which is lighter, Aluminum 7050-T7451 or Steel AISI 1018?

Aluminum 7050-T7451 is lighter: 2,830 kg/m³ against 7,861 kg/m³ for Steel AISI 1018.

Which is stiffer, Aluminum 7050-T7451 or Steel AISI 1018?

Steel AISI 1018 is stiffer: Young's modulus 200 GPa against 70.3 GPa for Aluminum 7050-T7451, so the same part in Steel AISI 1018 deflects less under the same load.

Which is lighter for the same job, Aluminum 7050-T7451 or Steel AISI 1018?

For the same stiffness or strength: Aluminum 7050-T7451 is lighter for a stiff beam (bending), stiff panel or plate, strong rod or tie, strong beam, strong panel or plate; Steel AISI 1018 is lighter for a stiff rod or tie (tension).

Part that must beAluminum 7050-T7451Steel AISI 1018
Stiff rod or tie (tension)2% heavierlighter
Stiff beam (bending)lighter1.65x heavier
Stiff panel or platelighter1.96x heavier
Strong rod or tielighter3.5x heavier
Strong beamlighter3.24x heavier
Strong panel or platelighter3.12x heavier

For the same stiffness or strength, mass scales with density over stiffness (or strength) raised to a power set by how the part is loaded: 1 for a rod in tension, 1/2 for a beam in bending, 1/3 for a panel (the standard material-selection indices).

Which conducts heat better, Aluminum 7050-T7451 or Steel AISI 1018?

Aluminum 7050-T7451 conducts heat better: 157 W/m·K against 51.9 W/m·K for Steel AISI 1018.

Which expands less with temperature?

Steel AISI 1018 expands less: 12 µm/m·K against 23.5 µm/m·K for Aluminum 7050-T7451.

Among 59 materials

1k10k0.1110100Density (kg/m³)Young's modulus (GPa)Plastic PLAPlastic PETGPlastic ABSPlastic TPUPlastic NylonAluminumSteelIronTitaniumStainless 304Stainless 316Aluminum 6061-T6Aluminum 7075-T6Brass C360Copper C110GlassSteel AISI 1045Steel AISI 4340Steel A992Stainless 303Stainless 17-4PHAluminum 2024-T351Aluminum 5052-H32Titanium Ti-6Al-4VBrass C260Nickel Inconel 718Magnesium AZ31B-H24Zinc Zamak 3Plastic ABS (bulk/injection)Plastic PolycarbonatePlastic POM/AcetalPlastic Nylon PA6Plastic Nylon PA66Plastic PEEKPlastic UHMWPEPlastic HDPEPlastic PolypropylenePlastic PMMAFDM ASAFDM PolycarbonateFDM PAHT-CFFDM HIPSSLA Resin Tough 2000SLS PA12 NylonDMLS AlSi10Mg AluminumDMLS Ti-6Al-4V ELI TitaniumDMLS 316L Stainless SteelDMLS 17-4PH Stainless SteelAluminum 7050-T7451Steel AISI 1018
Stiffness against density
1k10k101001kDensity (kg/m³)Yield strength (MPa)Plastic PLAPlastic PETGPlastic ABSPlastic TPUPlastic NylonRubberAluminumSteelIronTitaniumStainless 304Stainless 316Aluminum 6061-T6Aluminum 7075-T6Brass C360Copper C110GlassSteel AISI 1045Steel AISI 4340Steel A992Stainless 303Stainless 17-4PHAluminum 2024-T351Aluminum 5052-H32Titanium Ti-6Al-4VBrass C260Nickel Inconel 718Magnesium AZ31B-H24Zinc Zamak 3Plastic ABS (bulk/injection)Plastic PolycarbonatePlastic POM/AcetalPlastic Nylon PA6Plastic Nylon PA66Plastic PEEKPlastic PTFEPlastic UHMWPEPlastic HDPEPlastic PolypropylenePlastic PMMAFDM ASAFDM PolycarbonateFDM PAHT-CFFDM HIPSSLA Resin Tough 2000SLA Resin Elastic 50ASLS PA12 NylonDMLS AlSi10Mg AluminumDMLS Ti-6Al-4V ELI TitaniumDMLS 316L Stainless SteelDMLS 17-4PH Stainless SteelBrickAluminum 7050-T7451Steel AISI 1018
Strength against density

Related comparisons