Materials / Compare

Aluminum 7050-T7451 vs. Steel A992

Compare Aluminum 7050-T7451 vs. Steel A992 strength, stiffness, weight and thermal properties.

Change either side
Aluminum 7050-T7451Wrought
Steel A992Wrought
Try it on a partA bracket to run stress or thermal on, free in your browserOpen in LessCADOpen in LessCAD
Mechanical
Yield strength469MPasourcetypical, longitudinal, 0.2% offset385MPasourcetypical: mean of 20,295 A992 flange mill-test coupons (1998 SSPC survey), as reported by AISC
Ultimate tensile strength524MPasourcetypical, longitudinal505MPasourcetypical: mean of 20,295 A992 flange mill-test coupons (1998 SSPC survey)
Elongation at break11%sourcetypical, longitudinalnot sourced
Young's modulus (stiffness)70.3GPasourcetypical200GPasourcedesign value (AISC 360-16)
Density2,830kg/m³sourcenominal7,850kg/m³sourcenominal (constructional data)
Strength to weight166kN·m/kg3.38x higher49kN·m/kg
Stiffness to weight24.8MN·m/kg25.5MN·m/kg3% higher
Poisson's ratio0.33sourcetypical (handbook physical constant)0.3sourcedesign value (AISC 360-16 Commentary)
Shear modulus26.4GPa76.9GPa2.91x stiffer in shear
Bulk modulus68.9GPa167GPa
Speed of sound4,984m/s5,048m/s
Thermal
Thermal conductivity157W/m·Ksourcetypical, 20 °C48W/m·Ksourcenominal at 20 °C
Thermal expansion23.5µm/m·Ksourcetypical, mean 20-100 °C12µm/m·Ksourcenominal (constructional data, no temperature range stated)
100 mm part over a 50 °C swing118µm growth60µm growth1.96x less
Specific heat860J/kg·Ksourcetypical, at 100 °C460–480J/kg·Ksourcebase material: EN S275JR unalloyed structural steel (the EN counterpart of A36), typical, 50/100 °C
Heats up and cools (diffusivity)64.5mm²/s4.96x faster13mm²/s
Thermal shock resistance29,862W/m5.54x more resistant5,390W/m
Melting point524–635°Csourcemelting rangenot sourced
Values for7050-T7451 plate, Kaiser Aluminum sheet, coil & plate typical datasheet (longitudinal); Poisson from MIL-HDBK-5JASTM A992 W-shapes; Fy/Fu specified minimums from AISC publications (AISC 360-16 Commentary; Modern Steel Construction); elastic constants AISC 360; physical constants from the bauforumstahl structural-steel EPD, which names A992 among covered product standards.

Every value links to the document that states it. "Not sourced" means no citable source states it (or only a specification minimum); figures computed from it are left out too.

Questions

Is Aluminum 7050-T7451 stronger than Steel A992?

Aluminum 7050-T7451 is stronger: its yield strength is 469 MPa against 385 MPa for Steel A992 (22%).

Which is lighter, Aluminum 7050-T7451 or Steel A992?

Aluminum 7050-T7451 is lighter: 2,830 kg/m³ against 7,850 kg/m³ for Steel A992.

Which is stiffer, Aluminum 7050-T7451 or Steel A992?

Steel A992 is stiffer: Young's modulus 200 GPa against 70.3 GPa for Aluminum 7050-T7451, so the same part in Steel A992 deflects less under the same load.

Which is lighter for the same job, Aluminum 7050-T7451 or Steel A992?

For the same stiffness or strength: Aluminum 7050-T7451 is lighter for a stiff beam (bending), stiff panel or plate, strong rod or tie, strong beam, strong panel or plate; Steel A992 is lighter for a stiff rod or tie (tension).

Part that must beAluminum 7050-T7451Steel A992
Stiff rod or tie (tension)3% heavierlighter
Stiff beam (bending)lighter1.64x heavier
Stiff panel or platelighter1.96x heavier
Strong rod or tielighter3.38x heavier
Strong beamlighter3.16x heavier
Strong panel or platelighter3.06x heavier

For the same stiffness or strength, mass scales with density over stiffness (or strength) raised to a power set by how the part is loaded: 1 for a rod in tension, 1/2 for a beam in bending, 1/3 for a panel (the standard material-selection indices).

Which conducts heat better, Aluminum 7050-T7451 or Steel A992?

Aluminum 7050-T7451 conducts heat better: 157 W/m·K against 48 W/m·K for Steel A992.

Which expands less with temperature?

Steel A992 expands less: 12 µm/m·K against 23.5 µm/m·K for Aluminum 7050-T7451.

Among 59 materials

1k10k0.1110100Density (kg/m³)Young's modulus (GPa)Plastic PLAPlastic PETGPlastic ABSPlastic TPUPlastic NylonAluminumSteelIronTitaniumSteel AISI 1018Stainless 304Stainless 316Aluminum 6061-T6Aluminum 7075-T6Brass C360Copper C110GlassSteel AISI 1045Steel AISI 4340Stainless 303Stainless 17-4PHAluminum 2024-T351Aluminum 5052-H32Titanium Ti-6Al-4VBrass C260Nickel Inconel 718Magnesium AZ31B-H24Zinc Zamak 3Plastic ABS (bulk/injection)Plastic PolycarbonatePlastic POM/AcetalPlastic Nylon PA6Plastic Nylon PA66Plastic PEEKPlastic UHMWPEPlastic HDPEPlastic PolypropylenePlastic PMMAFDM ASAFDM PolycarbonateFDM PAHT-CFFDM HIPSSLA Resin Tough 2000SLS PA12 NylonDMLS AlSi10Mg AluminumDMLS Ti-6Al-4V ELI TitaniumDMLS 316L Stainless SteelDMLS 17-4PH Stainless SteelAluminum 7050-T7451Steel A992
Stiffness against density
1k10k101001kDensity (kg/m³)Yield strength (MPa)Plastic PLAPlastic PETGPlastic ABSPlastic TPUPlastic NylonRubberAluminumSteelIronTitaniumSteel AISI 1018Stainless 304Stainless 316Aluminum 6061-T6Aluminum 7075-T6Brass C360Copper C110GlassSteel AISI 1045Steel AISI 4340Stainless 303Stainless 17-4PHAluminum 2024-T351Aluminum 5052-H32Titanium Ti-6Al-4VBrass C260Nickel Inconel 718Magnesium AZ31B-H24Zinc Zamak 3Plastic ABS (bulk/injection)Plastic PolycarbonatePlastic POM/AcetalPlastic Nylon PA6Plastic Nylon PA66Plastic PEEKPlastic PTFEPlastic UHMWPEPlastic HDPEPlastic PolypropylenePlastic PMMAFDM ASAFDM PolycarbonateFDM PAHT-CFFDM HIPSSLA Resin Tough 2000SLA Resin Elastic 50ASLS PA12 NylonDMLS AlSi10Mg AluminumDMLS Ti-6Al-4V ELI TitaniumDMLS 316L Stainless SteelDMLS 17-4PH Stainless SteelBrickAluminum 7050-T7451Steel A992
Strength against density

Related comparisons