Materials / Compare

Aluminum 7050-T7451 vs. Plastic UHMWPE

Compare Aluminum 7050-T7451 vs. Plastic UHMWPE strength, stiffness, weight and thermal properties.

Change either side
Aluminum 7050-T7451Wrought
Plastic UHMWPEBulk polymer (molded or machined)
Try it on a partA bracket to run stress or thermal on, free in your browserOpen in LessCADOpen in LessCAD
Mechanical
Yield strength469MPasourcetypical, longitudinal, 0.2% offset20MPasourcetypical, tensile stress at yield ISO 527, 50 mm/min
Ultimate tensile strength524MPasourcetypical, longitudinal43MPasourcetypical, tensile stress at break ISO 527, 50 mm/min
Elongation at break11%sourcetypical, longitudinal465%sourcetypical, nominal elongation at break ISO 527
Young's modulus (stiffness)70.3GPasourcetypical0.66GPasourcetypical, tensile modulus ISO 527, 1 mm/min
Density2,830kg/m³sourcenominal930kg/m³sourcetypical
Strength to weight166kN·m/kg7.71x higher21.5kN·m/kg
Stiffness to weight24.8MN·m/kg35x higher0.71MN·m/kg
Poisson's ratio0.33sourcetypical (handbook physical constant)not sourced
Shear modulus26.4GPanot sourced
Bulk modulus68.9GPanot sourced
Speed of sound4,984m/s842m/s
Thermal
Thermal conductivity157W/m·Ksourcetypical, 20 °C0.4W/m·Ksourcetypical, unfilled (narrative value, generic Celanese UHMWPE)
Thermal expansion23.5µm/m·Ksourcetypical, mean 20-100 °C200µm/m·Ksourcetypical, 20 to 100 °C (generic Celanese UHMWPE)
100 mm part over a 50 °C swing118µm growth8.51x less1,000µm growth
Specific heat860J/kg·Ksourcetypical, at 100 °Cnot sourced
Heats up and cools (diffusivity)64.5mm²/snot sourced
Thermal shock resistance29,862W/mnot sourced
Melting point524–635°Csourcemelting range130–138°CsourceDSC 10 K/min
Max service temperaturenot sourced80°Csourcerecommended max constant operating temperature
Values for7050-T7451 plate, Kaiser Aluminum sheet, coil & plate typical datasheet (longitudinal); Poisson from MIL-HDBK-5JCelanese GUR 4120 (avg. molecular weight 4.7x10^6 g/mol), typical values on compression-molded specimens; CTE and thermal conductivity from Celanese's generic UHMWPE guide (grade not named)

Every value links to the document that states it. "Not sourced" means no citable source states it (or only a specification minimum); figures computed from it are left out too.

Questions

Is Aluminum 7050-T7451 stronger than Plastic UHMWPE?

Aluminum 7050-T7451 is stronger: its yield strength is 469 MPa against 20 MPa for Plastic UHMWPE (23.4x).

Which is lighter, Aluminum 7050-T7451 or Plastic UHMWPE?

Plastic UHMWPE is lighter: 930 kg/m³ against 2,830 kg/m³ for Aluminum 7050-T7451.

Which is stiffer, Aluminum 7050-T7451 or Plastic UHMWPE?

Aluminum 7050-T7451 is stiffer: Young's modulus 70.3 GPa against 0.66 GPa for Plastic UHMWPE, so the same part in Aluminum 7050-T7451 deflects less under the same load.

Which is lighter for the same job, Aluminum 7050-T7451 or Plastic UHMWPE?

For the same stiffness or strength: Aluminum 7050-T7451 is lighter for a stiff rod or tie (tension), stiff beam (bending), stiff panel or plate, strong rod or tie, strong beam, strong panel or plate.

Part that must beAluminum 7050-T7451Plastic UHMWPE
Stiff rod or tie (tension)lighter35x heavier
Stiff beam (bending)lighter3.39x heavier
Stiff panel or platelighter1.56x heavier
Strong rod or tielighter7.71x heavier
Strong beamlighter2.69x heavier
Strong panel or platelighter1.59x heavier

For the same stiffness or strength, mass scales with density over stiffness (or strength) raised to a power set by how the part is loaded: 1 for a rod in tension, 1/2 for a beam in bending, 1/3 for a panel (the standard material-selection indices).

Which conducts heat better, Aluminum 7050-T7451 or Plastic UHMWPE?

Aluminum 7050-T7451 conducts heat better: 157 W/m·K against 0.4 W/m·K for Plastic UHMWPE.

Which expands less with temperature?

Aluminum 7050-T7451 expands less: 23.5 µm/m·K against 200 µm/m·K for Plastic UHMWPE.

Among 59 materials

1k10k0.1110100Density (kg/m³)Young's modulus (GPa)Plastic PLAPlastic PETGPlastic ABSPlastic TPUPlastic NylonAluminumSteelIronTitaniumSteel AISI 1018Stainless 304Stainless 316Aluminum 6061-T6Aluminum 7075-T6Brass C360Copper C110GlassSteel AISI 1045Steel AISI 4340Steel A992Stainless 303Stainless 17-4PHAluminum 2024-T351Aluminum 5052-H32Titanium Ti-6Al-4VBrass C260Nickel Inconel 718Magnesium AZ31B-H24Zinc Zamak 3Plastic ABS (bulk/injection)Plastic PolycarbonatePlastic POM/AcetalPlastic Nylon PA6Plastic Nylon PA66Plastic PEEKPlastic HDPEPlastic PolypropylenePlastic PMMAFDM ASAFDM PolycarbonateFDM PAHT-CFFDM HIPSSLA Resin Tough 2000SLS PA12 NylonDMLS AlSi10Mg AluminumDMLS Ti-6Al-4V ELI TitaniumDMLS 316L Stainless SteelDMLS 17-4PH Stainless SteelAluminum 7050-T7451Plastic UHMWPE
Stiffness against density
1k10k101001kDensity (kg/m³)Yield strength (MPa)Plastic PLAPlastic PETGPlastic ABSPlastic TPUPlastic NylonRubberAluminumSteelIronTitaniumSteel AISI 1018Stainless 304Stainless 316Aluminum 6061-T6Aluminum 7075-T6Brass C360Copper C110GlassSteel AISI 1045Steel AISI 4340Steel A992Stainless 303Stainless 17-4PHAluminum 2024-T351Aluminum 5052-H32Titanium Ti-6Al-4VBrass C260Nickel Inconel 718Magnesium AZ31B-H24Zinc Zamak 3Plastic ABS (bulk/injection)Plastic PolycarbonatePlastic POM/AcetalPlastic Nylon PA6Plastic Nylon PA66Plastic PEEKPlastic PTFEPlastic HDPEPlastic PolypropylenePlastic PMMAFDM ASAFDM PolycarbonateFDM PAHT-CFFDM HIPSSLA Resin Tough 2000SLA Resin Elastic 50ASLS PA12 NylonDMLS AlSi10Mg AluminumDMLS Ti-6Al-4V ELI TitaniumDMLS 316L Stainless SteelDMLS 17-4PH Stainless SteelBrickAluminum 7050-T7451Plastic UHMWPE
Strength against density

Related comparisons