Materials / Compare

DMLS AlSi10Mg Aluminum vs. Brick

Compare DMLS AlSi10Mg Aluminum vs. Brick strength, stiffness, weight and thermal properties.

Change either side
DMLS AlSi10Mg Aluminum3D printed metal (DMLS)
BrickNatural
Try it on a partA sample part to run stress or thermal on, free in your browserOpen in LessCADOpen in LessCAD
Mechanical
Yield strength270MPasourcetypical, as manufactured, horizontalnot given (tensile used)
Ultimate tensile strength450MPasourcetypical, as manufactured, horizontal5.1MPasourcemodulus of rupture (no direct tensile value)
Compressive strengthnot sourced77.9MPasourcemean unit compressive strength, solid extruded brick (survey mean; SD 30.8 MPa)
Elongation at break10.2%sourcetypical at break, as manufactured, horizontalnot sourced
Young's modulus (stiffness)72GPasourcesame material and process, different machine maker: Renishaw RenAM 500, 30 µm, as built, horizontal (XY)not sourced
Density2,670kg/m³sourcetypical part density (ISO 3369), EOS M 290, AlSi10Mg_030_FlexM291 (30 µm)2,082kg/m³sourceface brick density row used for k (BIA notes most fired clay brick 120-130 lb/ft3)
Strength to weight101kN·m/kg41.3x higher2.45kN·m/kg
Stiffness to weight27MN·m/kgnot sourced
Poisson's ratio0.33sourcebase material: cast Al-Si-Mg alloy 359.0 (Al-9Si-0.6Mg, closest MIL-HDBK-5J alloy to AlSi10Mg / EN AC-43000)not sourced
Shear modulus27.1GPanot sourced
Bulk modulus70.6GPanot sourced
Speed of sound5,193m/snot sourced
Thermal
Thermal conductivity110W/m·Ksourcetypical, as manufactured, horizontal (ISO 22007-2)0.92–1.12W/m·Ksourcerange for 130 lb/ft3 face brick (ASHRAE 2013 via BIA)
Thermal expansion20µm/m·Ksourcemean 25-100 °C, ASTM E2287.2µm/m·KsourceTMS Code average coefficient, clay/shale unit masonry
100 mm part over a 50 °C swing100µm growth36µm growth2.78x less
Specific heat963J/kg·Ksourcebase material: cast Al-Si-Mg alloy 359.0 (MIL-HDBK-5J), at 100 °C837J/kg·Ksourcevalue used in BIA heat-capacity sample calculation
Heats up and cools (diffusivity)42.8mm²/s73.1x faster0.585mm²/s
Thermal shock resistance13,819W/mnot sourced
Values forEOS Aluminium AlSi10Mg (powder 9011-0024), EOS M 290 | 30 µm process (AlSi10Mg_FlexM291 2.01), as manufactured, horizontal; machined (turned) specimens, ISO 6892-1 B10Solid extruded clay/shale brick units (BIA 1993 manufacturer survey, TN 3A 2024); face brick of 130 lb/ft3 for thermal properties (BIA TN 4, from ASHRAE 2013); CTE is the TMS Code value for clay/shale masonry

Every value links to the document that states it. "Not sourced" means no citable source states it (or only a specification minimum); figures computed from it are left out too.

DMLS AlSi10Mg Aluminum is 3D printed: its properties depend on build direction and print settings; these are typical values.

Questions

Is DMLS AlSi10Mg Aluminum stronger than Brick?

DMLS AlSi10Mg Aluminum is stronger: its yield strength is 270 MPa against tensile strength 5.1 MPa for Brick (52.9x).

Which is lighter, DMLS AlSi10Mg Aluminum or Brick?

Brick is lighter: 2,082 kg/m³ against 2,670 kg/m³ for DMLS AlSi10Mg Aluminum.

Which is lighter for the same job, DMLS AlSi10Mg Aluminum or Brick?

For the same stiffness or strength: DMLS AlSi10Mg Aluminum is lighter for a strong rod or tie, strong beam, strong panel or plate.

Part that must beDMLS AlSi10Mg AluminumBrick
Strong rod or tielighter41.3x heavier
Strong beamlighter11x heavier
Strong panel or platelighter5.67x heavier

For the same stiffness or strength, mass scales with density over stiffness (or strength) raised to a power set by how the part is loaded: 1 for a rod in tension, 1/2 for a beam in bending, 1/3 for a panel (the standard material-selection indices).

Which conducts heat better, DMLS AlSi10Mg Aluminum or Brick?

DMLS AlSi10Mg Aluminum conducts heat better: 110 W/m·K against 1.02 W/m·K for Brick.

Which expands less with temperature?

Brick expands less: 7.2 µm/m·K against 20 µm/m·K for DMLS AlSi10Mg Aluminum.

Among 59 materials

1k10k0.1110100Density (kg/m³)Young's modulus (GPa)Plastic PLAPlastic PETGPlastic ABSPlastic TPUPlastic NylonAluminumSteelIronTitaniumSteel AISI 1018Stainless 304Stainless 316Aluminum 6061-T6Aluminum 7075-T6Brass C360Copper C110GlassSteel AISI 1045Steel AISI 4340Steel A992Stainless 303Stainless 17-4PHAluminum 2024-T351Aluminum 5052-H32Aluminum 7050-T7451Titanium Ti-6Al-4VBrass C260Nickel Inconel 718Magnesium AZ31B-H24Zinc Zamak 3Plastic ABS (bulk/injection)Plastic PolycarbonatePlastic POM/AcetalPlastic Nylon PA6Plastic Nylon PA66Plastic PEEKPlastic UHMWPEPlastic HDPEPlastic PolypropylenePlastic PMMAFDM ASAFDM PolycarbonateFDM PAHT-CFFDM HIPSSLA Resin Tough 2000SLS PA12 NylonDMLS Ti-6Al-4V ELI TitaniumDMLS 316L Stainless SteelDMLS 17-4PH Stainless SteelDMLS AlSi10Mg Aluminum
Stiffness against density
1k10k101001kDensity (kg/m³)Yield strength (MPa)Plastic PLAPlastic PETGPlastic ABSPlastic TPUPlastic NylonRubberAluminumSteelIronTitaniumSteel AISI 1018Stainless 304Stainless 316Aluminum 6061-T6Aluminum 7075-T6Brass C360Copper C110GlassSteel AISI 1045Steel AISI 4340Steel A992Stainless 303Stainless 17-4PHAluminum 2024-T351Aluminum 5052-H32Aluminum 7050-T7451Titanium Ti-6Al-4VBrass C260Nickel Inconel 718Magnesium AZ31B-H24Zinc Zamak 3Plastic ABS (bulk/injection)Plastic PolycarbonatePlastic POM/AcetalPlastic Nylon PA6Plastic Nylon PA66Plastic PEEKPlastic PTFEPlastic UHMWPEPlastic HDPEPlastic PolypropylenePlastic PMMAFDM ASAFDM PolycarbonateFDM PAHT-CFFDM HIPSSLA Resin Tough 2000SLA Resin Elastic 50ASLS PA12 NylonDMLS Ti-6Al-4V ELI TitaniumDMLS 316L Stainless SteelDMLS 17-4PH Stainless SteelDMLS AlSi10Mg AluminumBrick
Strength against density

Related comparisons