Materials / Compare
DMLS AlSi10Mg Aluminum vs. Plastic PETG
Compare DMLS AlSi10Mg Aluminum vs. Plastic PETG strength, stiffness, weight and thermal properties.
| Try it on a partA bracket to run stress or thermal on, free in your browser | Open in LessCAD | Open in LessCAD |
|---|---|---|
| Mechanical | ||
| Yield strength | 270MPasourcetypical, as manufactured, horizontal | 46.2MPasourcetypical |
| Ultimate tensile strength | 450MPasourcetypical, as manufactured, horizontal | 46.2MPasourcetypical, peak stress (= stress at yield) |
| Flexural strength | not sourced | 78.9MPasourcetypical |
| Elongation at break | 10.2%sourcetypical at break, as manufactured, horizontal | 7.6%sourcetypical |
| Young's modulus (stiffness) | 72GPasourcesame material and process, different machine maker: Renishaw RenAM 500, 30 µm, as built, horizontal (XY) | 1.94GPasourcetypical |
| Density | 2,670kg/m³sourcetypical part density (ISO 3369), EOS M 290, AlSi10Mg_030_FlexM291 (30 µm) | 1,270kg/m³sourcetypical |
| Strength to weight | 101kN·m/kg2.78x higher | 36.4kN·m/kg |
| Stiffness to weight | 27MN·m/kg17.7x higher | 1.53MN·m/kg |
| Poisson's ratio | 0.33sourcebase material: cast Al-Si-Mg alloy 359.0 (Al-9Si-0.6Mg, closest MIL-HDBK-5J alloy to AlSi10Mg / EN AC-43000) | not sourced |
| Shear modulus | 27.1GPa | not sourced |
| Bulk modulus | 70.6GPa | not sourced |
| Speed of sound | 5,193m/s | 1,236m/s |
| Thermal | ||
| Thermal conductivity | 110W/m·Ksourcetypical, as manufactured, horizontal (ISO 22007-2) | 0.21W/m·Ksourcebase material: Eastman Eastar Copolyester 6763 (PETG), typical |
| Thermal expansion | 20µm/m·Ksourcemean 25-100 °C, ASTM E228 | 51µm/m·Ksourcebase material: Eastman Eastar Copolyester 6763 (PETG), typical |
| 100 mm part over a 50 °C swing | 100µm growth2.55x less | 255µm growth |
| Specific heat | 963J/kg·Ksourcebase material: cast Al-Si-Mg alloy 359.0 (MIL-HDBK-5J), at 100 °C | 1,300J/kg·Ksourcebase material: Eastman Eastar Copolyester 6763 (PETG), DSC at 60 °C (lowest temperature listed) |
| Heats up and cools (diffusivity) | 42.8mm²/s336x faster | 0.127mm²/s |
| Thermal shock resistance | 13,819W/m | not sourced |
| Glass transition | not sourced | 77.4°Csourcetypical |
| Max service temperature | not sourced | 76.2°CsourceHDT 0.455 MPa (printed specimens) |
| Values for | EOS Aluminium AlSi10Mg (powder 9011-0024), EOS M 290 | 30 µm process (AlSi10Mg_FlexM291 2.01), as manufactured, horizontal; machined (turned) specimens, ISO 6892-1 B10 | Ultimaker PETG, 3D-printed specimens, XY (flat); Ultimaker S5 Pro, engineering intent profile, 0.15 mm layer height, AA 0.4 print core, 100% infill, Cura 4.9, printed one-at-a-time, conditioned >=24 h at room temperature. TDS v1.00, April 29, 2022. |
Every value links to the document that states it. "Not sourced" means no citable source states it (or only a specification minimum); figures computed from it are left out too.
DMLS AlSi10Mg Aluminum and Plastic PETG are 3D printed: their properties depend on build direction and print settings; these are typical values.
Questions
Is DMLS AlSi10Mg Aluminum stronger than Plastic PETG?
DMLS AlSi10Mg Aluminum is stronger: its yield strength is 270 MPa against 46.2 MPa for Plastic PETG (5.84x).
Which is lighter, DMLS AlSi10Mg Aluminum or Plastic PETG?
Plastic PETG is lighter: 1,270 kg/m³ against 2,670 kg/m³ for DMLS AlSi10Mg Aluminum.
Which is stiffer, DMLS AlSi10Mg Aluminum or Plastic PETG?
DMLS AlSi10Mg Aluminum is stiffer: Young's modulus 72 GPa against 1.94 GPa for Plastic PETG, so the same part in DMLS AlSi10Mg Aluminum deflects less under the same load.
Which is lighter for the same job, DMLS AlSi10Mg Aluminum or Plastic PETG?
For the same stiffness or strength: DMLS AlSi10Mg Aluminum is lighter for a stiff rod or tie (tension), stiff beam (bending), stiff panel or plate, strong rod or tie, strong beam, strong panel or plate.
| Part that must be | DMLS AlSi10Mg Aluminum | Plastic PETG |
|---|---|---|
| Stiff rod or tie (tension) | lighter | 17.7x heavier |
| Stiff beam (bending) | lighter | 2.9x heavier |
| Stiff panel or plate | lighter | 1.59x heavier |
| Strong rod or tie | lighter | 2.78x heavier |
| Strong beam | lighter | 1.54x heavier |
| Strong panel or plate | lighter | 15% heavier |
For the same stiffness or strength, mass scales with density over stiffness (or strength) raised to a power set by how the part is loaded: 1 for a rod in tension, 1/2 for a beam in bending, 1/3 for a panel (the standard material-selection indices).
Which conducts heat better, DMLS AlSi10Mg Aluminum or Plastic PETG?
DMLS AlSi10Mg Aluminum conducts heat better: 110 W/m·K against 0.21 W/m·K for Plastic PETG.
Which expands less with temperature?
DMLS AlSi10Mg Aluminum expands less: 20 µm/m·K against 51 µm/m·K for Plastic PETG.
Among 59 materials
Related comparisons
- DMLS AlSi10Mg Aluminum vs. Aluminum
- DMLS AlSi10Mg Aluminum vs. Aluminum 6061-T6
- DMLS AlSi10Mg Aluminum vs. Aluminum 2024-T351
- DMLS AlSi10Mg Aluminum vs. Concrete
- Plastic PETG vs. SLA Resin Tough 2000
- Plastic PETG vs. Plastic ABS
- Plastic PETG vs. FDM Polycarbonate
- Plastic PETG vs. Plastic ABS (bulk/injection)