Materials / Compare

Aluminum 6061-T6 vs. Ceramic Alumina 96%

Compare Aluminum 6061-T6 vs. Ceramic Alumina 96% strength, stiffness, weight and thermal properties.

Change either side
Aluminum 6061-T6Wrought
Ceramic Alumina 96%Sintered ceramic (pressed and fired)
Try it on a partA sample part to run stress or thermal on, free in your browserOpen in LessCADOpen in LessCAD
Mechanical
Yield strength276MPasourcetypical, 0.2% offset, .500 in dia specimennot given (tensile used)
Ultimate tensile strength310MPasourcetypical221MPasourcetypical tensile strength, 25 °C (ACMA Test #4)
Compressive strengthnot sourced2,068MPasourcetypical, 20 °C (ASTM-C773)
Flexural strengthnot sourced358MPasourceflexural strength (MOR), 20 °C (ASTM-F417)
Elongation at break17%sourcetypical, in 4D, 0.500 in dia specimennot sourced
Young's modulus (stiffness)68.3GPasourcetypical303GPasourcetypical, 20 °C (ASTM-C848)
Density2,700kg/m³sourcenominal3,720kg/m³sourcetypical (ASTM-C20)
Strength to weight102kN·m/kg1.72x higher59.4kN·m/kg
Stiffness to weight25.3MN·m/kg81.5MN·m/kg3.22x higher
Poisson's ratio0.33sourcetypical (handbook physical constant)0.21sourcetypical, 20 °C (ASTM-C848)
Shear modulus25.7GPa125GPa4.88x stiffer in shear
Bulk modulus67GPa174GPa
Speed of sound5,030m/s9,025m/s
Thermal
Thermal conductivity167W/m·Ksourcetypical, 20 °C24.7W/m·Ksourcetypical, 20 °C (ASTM-C408)
Thermal expansion23.6µm/m·Ksourcetypical, mean 20-100 °C8.2µm/m·Ksourcemean, 25-1000 °C (ASTM-C372)
100 mm part over a 50 °C swing118µm growth41µm growth2.88x less
Specific heat896J/kg·Ksourcetypical, at 100 °C880J/kg·Ksourcetypical, 100 °C (ASTM-E1269)
Heats up and cools (diffusivity)69mm²/s9.15x faster7.55mm²/s
Thermal shock resistance19,159W/m11x more resistant1,736W/m
Melting point582–652°Csourcesolidus-liquidusnot sourced
Values for6061-T6/T651, Kaiser Aluminum typical properties; Poisson from MIL-HDBK-5JCoorsTek AD-96, nominal 96% Al2O3 sintered alumina, typical values; CoorsTek "Ceramic Seal Material Properties" (© 2018, 01899 F). AD-96 is the general 96% grade, not the ADS-96R substrate grade.

Every value links to the document that states it. "Not sourced" means no citable source states it (or only a specification minimum); figures computed from it are left out too.

Questions

Is Aluminum 6061-T6 stronger than Ceramic Alumina 96%?

Aluminum 6061-T6 is stronger: its yield strength is 276 MPa against tensile strength 221 MPa for Ceramic Alumina 96% (25%).

Which is lighter, Aluminum 6061-T6 or Ceramic Alumina 96%?

Aluminum 6061-T6 is lighter: 2,700 kg/m³ against 3,720 kg/m³ for Ceramic Alumina 96%.

Which is stiffer, Aluminum 6061-T6 or Ceramic Alumina 96%?

Ceramic Alumina 96% is stiffer: Young's modulus 303 GPa against 68.3 GPa for Aluminum 6061-T6, so the same part in Ceramic Alumina 96% deflects less under the same load.

Which is lighter for the same job, Aluminum 6061-T6 or Ceramic Alumina 96%?

For the same stiffness or strength: Aluminum 6061-T6 is lighter for a strong rod or tie, strong beam, strong panel or plate; Ceramic Alumina 96% is lighter for a stiff rod or tie (tension), stiff beam (bending), stiff panel or plate.

Part that must beAluminum 6061-T6Ceramic Alumina 96%
Stiff rod or tie (tension)3.22x heavierlighter
Stiff beam (bending)1.53x heavierlighter
Stiff panel or plate19% heavierlighter
Strong rod or tielighter1.72x heavier
Strong beamlighter1.6x heavier
Strong panel or platelighter1.54x heavier

For the same stiffness or strength, mass scales with density over stiffness (or strength) raised to a power set by how the part is loaded: 1 for a rod in tension, 1/2 for a beam in bending, 1/3 for a panel (the standard material-selection indices).

Which conducts heat better, Aluminum 6061-T6 or Ceramic Alumina 96%?

Aluminum 6061-T6 conducts heat better: 167 W/m·K against 24.7 W/m·K for Ceramic Alumina 96%.

Which expands less with temperature?

Ceramic Alumina 96% expands less: 8.2 µm/m·K against 23.6 µm/m·K for Aluminum 6061-T6.

Among 72 materials

1k10k0.1110100Density (kg/m³)Young's modulus (GPa)Plastic PLAPlastic PETGPlastic ABSPlastic TPUPlastic NylonAluminumSteelIronTitaniumSteel AISI 1018Stainless Steel 304Stainless Steel 316Aluminum 7075-T6Brass C360Copper C110GlassSteel AISI 1045Steel AISI 4340Steel A992Stainless Steel 303Stainless Steel 17-4PHAluminum 2024-T351Aluminum 5052-H32Aluminum 7050-T7451Titanium Ti-6Al-4VBrass C260Nickel Inconel 718Magnesium AZ31B-H24Zinc Zamak 3Plastic ABS (bulk/injection)Plastic PolycarbonatePlastic POM/AcetalPlastic Nylon PA6Plastic Nylon PA66Plastic PEEKPlastic UHMWPEPlastic HDPEPlastic PolypropylenePlastic PMMAFDM ASAFDM PolycarbonateFDM PAHT-CFFDM HIPSSLA Resin Tough 2000SLS PA12 NylonDMLS AlSi10Mg AluminumDMLS Ti-6Al-4V ELI TitaniumDMLS 316L Stainless SteelDMLS 17-4PH Stainless SteelPCB Laminate FR-4SiliconCeramic Aluminum NitrideAluminum A380Aluminum 6063-T6Aluminum 1100-OAluminum ADC12Magnesium AZ91DSolder SAC305Plastic PBT GF30Plastic PPS GF40Plastic LCP GF30Aluminum 6061-T6Ceramic Alumina 96%
Stiffness against density
1k10k101001kDensity (kg/m³)Yield strength (MPa)Plastic PLAPlastic PETGPlastic ABSPlastic TPUPlastic NylonRubberAluminumSteelIronTitaniumSteel AISI 1018Stainless Steel 304Stainless Steel 316Aluminum 7075-T6Brass C360Copper C110GlassSteel AISI 1045Steel AISI 4340Steel A992Stainless Steel 303Stainless Steel 17-4PHAluminum 2024-T351Aluminum 5052-H32Aluminum 7050-T7451Titanium Ti-6Al-4VBrass C260Nickel Inconel 718Magnesium AZ31B-H24Zinc Zamak 3Plastic ABS (bulk/injection)Plastic PolycarbonatePlastic POM/AcetalPlastic Nylon PA6Plastic Nylon PA66Plastic PEEKPlastic PTFEPlastic UHMWPEPlastic HDPEPlastic PolypropylenePlastic PMMAFDM ASAFDM PolycarbonateFDM PAHT-CFFDM HIPSSLA Resin Tough 2000SLA Resin Elastic 50ASLS PA12 NylonDMLS AlSi10Mg AluminumDMLS Ti-6Al-4V ELI TitaniumDMLS 316L Stainless SteelDMLS 17-4PH Stainless SteelBrickPCB Laminate FR-4SiliconAluminum A380Aluminum 6063-T6Aluminum 1100-OAluminum ADC12Magnesium AZ91DSolder SAC305Plastic PBT GF30Plastic PPS GF40Plastic LCP GF30Aluminum 6061-T6Ceramic Alumina 96%
Strength against density

Related comparisons