511°Csourcestrain point (ASTM C336) - stress-relaxation onset, not a rated service limit
Values for
6063-T6 extruded tube, Kaiser Aluminum Tube & Pipe Alloy 6063 Technical Data (Rev. 05/06), typical properties; specific heat from Hydro EN AW-6063 extruded-products datasheet (Rev.4, 03/2023).
Annealed soda-lime-silica float glass, Pilkington North America Technical Bulletin ATS-129 (04/2025)
Every value links to the document that states it. "Not sourced" means no citable source states it (or only a specification minimum); figures computed from it are left out too.
Questions
Is Aluminum 6063-T6 stronger than Glass?
Aluminum 6063-T6 is stronger: its yield strength is 215 MPa against tensile strength 41 MPa for Glass (5.24x).
Which is lighter, Aluminum 6063-T6 or Glass?
Glass is lighter: 2,500 kg/m³ against 2,700 kg/m³ for Aluminum 6063-T6.
Which is stiffer, Aluminum 6063-T6 or Glass?
Glass is stiffer: Young's modulus 72 GPa against 69 GPa for Aluminum 6063-T6, so the same part in Glass deflects less under the same load.
Which is lighter for the same job, Aluminum 6063-T6 or Glass?
For the same stiffness or strength: Aluminum 6063-T6 is lighter for a strong rod or tie, strong beam, strong panel or plate; Glass is lighter for a stiff rod or tie (tension), stiff beam (bending), stiff panel or plate.
Part that must be
Aluminum 6063-T6
Glass
Stiff rod or tie (tension)
13% heavier
lighter
Stiff beam (bending)
10% heavier
lighter
Stiff panel or plate
10% heavier
lighter
Strong rod or tie
lighter
4.86x heavier
Strong beam
lighter
2.79x heavier
Strong panel or plate
lighter
2.12x heavier
For the same stiffness or strength, mass scales with density over stiffness (or strength) raised to a power set by how the part is loaded: 1 for a rod in tension, 1/2 for a beam in bending, 1/3 for a panel (the standard material-selection indices).
Which conducts heat better, Aluminum 6063-T6 or Glass?
Aluminum 6063-T6 conducts heat better: 201 W/m·K against 0.937 W/m·K for Glass.
Which expands less with temperature?
Glass expands less: 8.3 µm/m·K against 23.4 µm/m·K for Aluminum 6063-T6.