Materials / Compare

Aluminum A380 vs. Ceramic Alumina 96%

Compare Aluminum A380 vs. Ceramic Alumina 96% strength, stiffness, weight and thermal properties.

Change either side
Aluminum A380Cast
Ceramic Alumina 96%Sintered ceramic (pressed and fired)
Try it on a partA sample part to run stress or thermal on, free in your browserOpen in LessCADOpen in LessCAD
Mechanical
Yield strength160MPasourcetypical, 25 °Cnot given (tensile used)
Ultimate tensile strength320MPasourcetypical, 25 °C221MPasourcetypical tensile strength, 25 °C (ACMA Test #4)
Compressive strengthnot sourced2,068MPasourcetypical, 20 °C (ASTM-C773)
Flexural strengthnot sourced358MPasourceflexural strength (MOR), 20 °C (ASTM-F417)
Elongation at break3.5%sourcetypicalnot sourced
Young's modulus (stiffness)71GPasourcetypical, 25 °C303GPasourcetypical, 20 °C (ASTM-C848)
Density2,713kg/m³sourcetypical at 68 °F3,720kg/m³sourcetypical (ASTM-C20)
Strength to weight59kN·m/kg59.4kN·m/kg
Stiffness to weight26.2MN·m/kg81.5MN·m/kg3.11x higher
Poisson's rationot sourced0.21sourcetypical, 20 °C (ASTM-C848)
Shear modulusnot sourced125GPa
Bulk modulusnot sourced174GPa
Speed of sound5,116m/s9,025m/s
Thermal
Thermal conductivity96.2W/m·Ksourcetypical at 68 °F24.7W/m·Ksourcetypical, 20 °C (ASTM-C408)
Thermal expansion21.8µm/m·Ksourcetypical, 68-572 °F (20-300 °C)8.2µm/m·Ksourcemean, 25-1000 °C (ASTM-C372)
100 mm part over a 50 °C swing109µm growth41µm growth2.66x less
Specific heat963J/kg·Ksourcetypical at 68 °F880J/kg·Ksourcetypical, 100 °C (ASTM-E1269)
Heats up and cools (diffusivity)36.8mm²/s4.88x faster7.55mm²/s
Thermal shock resistancenot sourced1,736W/m
Values forA380 aluminium high-pressure die-casting alloy, typical properties; Rheocast Company (aluminium die caster, Germantown WI) A380 alloy data page.CoorsTek AD-96, nominal 96% Al2O3 sintered alumina, typical values; CoorsTek "Ceramic Seal Material Properties" (© 2018, 01899 F). AD-96 is the general 96% grade, not the ADS-96R substrate grade.

Every value links to the document that states it. "Not sourced" means no citable source states it (or only a specification minimum); figures computed from it are left out too.

Questions

Is Aluminum A380 stronger than Ceramic Alumina 96%?

Ceramic Alumina 96% is stronger: its tensile strength is 221 MPa against yield strength 160 MPa for Aluminum A380 (38%).

Which is lighter, Aluminum A380 or Ceramic Alumina 96%?

Aluminum A380 is lighter: 2,713 kg/m³ against 3,720 kg/m³ for Ceramic Alumina 96%.

Which is stiffer, Aluminum A380 or Ceramic Alumina 96%?

Ceramic Alumina 96% is stiffer: Young's modulus 303 GPa against 71 GPa for Aluminum A380, so the same part in Ceramic Alumina 96% deflects less under the same load.

Which is lighter for the same job, Aluminum A380 or Ceramic Alumina 96%?

For the same stiffness or strength: Aluminum A380 is lighter for a strong beam, strong panel or plate; Ceramic Alumina 96% is lighter for a stiff rod or tie (tension), stiff beam (bending), stiff panel or plate.

Part that must beAluminum A380Ceramic Alumina 96%
Stiff rod or tie (tension)3.11x heavierlighter
Stiff beam (bending)1.51x heavierlighter
Stiff panel or plate18% heavierlighter
Strong rod or tieabout equalabout equal
Strong beamlighter11% heavier
Strong panel or platelighter17% heavier

For the same stiffness or strength, mass scales with density over stiffness (or strength) raised to a power set by how the part is loaded: 1 for a rod in tension, 1/2 for a beam in bending, 1/3 for a panel (the standard material-selection indices).

Which conducts heat better, Aluminum A380 or Ceramic Alumina 96%?

Aluminum A380 conducts heat better: 96.2 W/m·K against 24.7 W/m·K for Ceramic Alumina 96%.

Which expands less with temperature?

Ceramic Alumina 96% expands less: 8.2 µm/m·K against 21.8 µm/m·K for Aluminum A380.

Among 72 materials

1k10k0.1110100Density (kg/m³)Young's modulus (GPa)Plastic PLAPlastic PETGPlastic ABSPlastic TPUPlastic NylonAluminumSteelIronTitaniumSteel AISI 1018Stainless Steel 304Stainless Steel 316Aluminum 6061-T6Aluminum 7075-T6Brass C360Copper C110GlassSteel AISI 1045Steel AISI 4340Steel A992Stainless Steel 303Stainless Steel 17-4PHAluminum 2024-T351Aluminum 5052-H32Aluminum 7050-T7451Titanium Ti-6Al-4VBrass C260Nickel Inconel 718Magnesium AZ31B-H24Zinc Zamak 3Plastic ABS (bulk/injection)Plastic PolycarbonatePlastic POM/AcetalPlastic Nylon PA6Plastic Nylon PA66Plastic PEEKPlastic UHMWPEPlastic HDPEPlastic PolypropylenePlastic PMMAFDM ASAFDM PolycarbonateFDM PAHT-CFFDM HIPSSLA Resin Tough 2000SLS PA12 NylonDMLS AlSi10Mg AluminumDMLS Ti-6Al-4V ELI TitaniumDMLS 316L Stainless SteelDMLS 17-4PH Stainless SteelPCB Laminate FR-4SiliconCeramic Aluminum NitrideAluminum 6063-T6Aluminum 1100-OAluminum ADC12Magnesium AZ91DSolder SAC305Plastic PBT GF30Plastic PPS GF40Plastic LCP GF30Aluminum A380Ceramic Alumina 96%
Stiffness against density
1k10k101001kDensity (kg/m³)Yield strength (MPa)Plastic PLAPlastic PETGPlastic ABSPlastic TPUPlastic NylonRubberAluminumSteelIronTitaniumSteel AISI 1018Stainless Steel 304Stainless Steel 316Aluminum 6061-T6Aluminum 7075-T6Brass C360Copper C110GlassSteel AISI 1045Steel AISI 4340Steel A992Stainless Steel 303Stainless Steel 17-4PHAluminum 2024-T351Aluminum 5052-H32Aluminum 7050-T7451Titanium Ti-6Al-4VBrass C260Nickel Inconel 718Magnesium AZ31B-H24Zinc Zamak 3Plastic ABS (bulk/injection)Plastic PolycarbonatePlastic POM/AcetalPlastic Nylon PA6Plastic Nylon PA66Plastic PEEKPlastic PTFEPlastic UHMWPEPlastic HDPEPlastic PolypropylenePlastic PMMAFDM ASAFDM PolycarbonateFDM PAHT-CFFDM HIPSSLA Resin Tough 2000SLA Resin Elastic 50ASLS PA12 NylonDMLS AlSi10Mg AluminumDMLS Ti-6Al-4V ELI TitaniumDMLS 316L Stainless SteelDMLS 17-4PH Stainless SteelBrickPCB Laminate FR-4SiliconAluminum 6063-T6Aluminum 1100-OAluminum ADC12Magnesium AZ91DSolder SAC305Plastic PBT GF30Plastic PPS GF40Plastic LCP GF30Aluminum A380Ceramic Alumina 96%
Strength against density

Related comparisons