Materials / Compare

Aluminum vs. Steel AISI 1018

Compare Aluminum vs. Steel AISI 1018 strength, stiffness, weight and thermal properties.

Change either side
AluminumWrought
Steel AISI 1018Wrought
Try it on a partA bracket to run stress or thermal on, free in your browserOpen in LessCADOpen in LessCAD
Mechanical
Yield strength276MPasourcetypical, 0.2% offset, .500 in dia specimen372MPasourceproducer-stated, cold drawn
Ultimate tensile strength310MPasourcetypical441MPasourceproducer-stated, cold drawn
Elongation at break17%sourcetypical, in 4D, 0.500 in dia specimen15%sourcein 2 in (50.8 mm)
Young's modulus (stiffness)68.3GPasourcetypical200GPasourcebase material: AISI 1025 plain carbon steel (MIL-HDBK-5J design value; ASTM A108 bar is the cold-finished carbon-steel bar spec that also covers 1018)
Density2,700kg/m³sourcenominal7,861kg/m³sourcebase material: AISI 1025 plain carbon steel (MIL-HDBK-5J design value; ASTM A108 bar is the cold-finished carbon-steel bar spec that also covers 1018)
Strength to weight102kN·m/kg2.16x higher47.3kN·m/kg
Stiffness to weight25.3MN·m/kg25.4MN·m/kg
Poisson's ratio0.33sourcetypical (handbook physical constant)0.32sourcebase material: AISI 1025 plain carbon steel (MIL-HDBK-5J design value; ASTM A108 bar is the cold-finished carbon-steel bar spec that also covers 1018)
Shear modulus25.7GPa75.7GPa2.95x stiffer in shear
Bulk modulus67GPa185GPa
Speed of sound5,030m/s5,043m/s
Thermal
Thermal conductivity167W/m·Ksourcetypical, 20 °C51.9W/m·Ksourcebase material: AISI 1025 plain carbon steel (MIL-HDBK-5J design value; ASTM A108 bar is the cold-finished carbon-steel bar spec that also covers 1018)
Thermal expansion23.6µm/m·Ksourcetypical, mean 20-100 °C12µm/m·Ksourcebase material: unalloyed carbon steel, Ovako family table (S275JR, 'none alloyed structural steels', C <= 0.21%); mean 20-300 °C
100 mm part over a 50 °C swing118µm growth60µm growth1.97x less
Specific heat896J/kg·Ksourcetypical, at 100 °C486J/kg·Ksourcebase material: AISI 1025 plain carbon steel (MIL-HDBK-5J design value; ASTM A108 bar is the cold-finished carbon-steel bar spec that also covers 1018)
Heats up and cools (diffusivity)69mm²/s5.08x faster13.6mm²/s
Thermal shock resistance19,159W/m3.5x more resistant5,473W/m
Melting point582–652°Csourcesolidus-liquidusnot sourced
Values for6061-T6/T651, Kaiser Aluminum typical properties (sheet, coil & plate datasheet); Poisson from MIL-HDBK-5JAISI 1018 cold drawn bar (Niagara LaSalle, cold-finished bar producer)

Every value links to the document that states it. "Not sourced" means no citable source states it (or only a specification minimum); figures computed from it are left out too.

Questions

Is Aluminum stronger than Steel AISI 1018?

Steel AISI 1018 is stronger: its yield strength is 372 MPa against 276 MPa for Aluminum (35%).

Which is lighter, Aluminum or Steel AISI 1018?

Aluminum is lighter: 2,700 kg/m³ against 7,861 kg/m³ for Steel AISI 1018.

Which is stiffer, Aluminum or Steel AISI 1018?

Steel AISI 1018 is stiffer: Young's modulus 200 GPa against 68.3 GPa for Aluminum, so the same part in Steel AISI 1018 deflects less under the same load.

Which is lighter for the same job, Aluminum or Steel AISI 1018?

For the same stiffness or strength: Aluminum is lighter for a stiff beam (bending), stiff panel or plate, strong rod or tie, strong beam, strong panel or plate.

Part that must beAluminumSteel AISI 1018
Stiff rod or tie (tension)about equalabout equal
Stiff beam (bending)lighter1.7x heavier
Stiff panel or platelighter2.04x heavier
Strong rod or tielighter2.16x heavier
Strong beamlighter2.39x heavier
Strong panel or platelighter2.51x heavier

For the same stiffness or strength, mass scales with density over stiffness (or strength) raised to a power set by how the part is loaded: 1 for a rod in tension, 1/2 for a beam in bending, 1/3 for a panel (the standard material-selection indices).

Which conducts heat better, Aluminum or Steel AISI 1018?

Aluminum conducts heat better: 167 W/m·K against 51.9 W/m·K for Steel AISI 1018.

Which expands less with temperature?

Steel AISI 1018 expands less: 12 µm/m·K against 23.6 µm/m·K for Aluminum.

Among 59 materials

1k10k0.1110100Density (kg/m³)Young's modulus (GPa)Plastic PLAPlastic PETGPlastic ABSPlastic TPUPlastic NylonSteelIronTitaniumStainless 304Stainless 316Aluminum 6061-T6Aluminum 7075-T6Brass C360Copper C110GlassSteel AISI 1045Steel AISI 4340Steel A992Stainless 303Stainless 17-4PHAluminum 2024-T351Aluminum 5052-H32Aluminum 7050-T7451Titanium Ti-6Al-4VBrass C260Nickel Inconel 718Magnesium AZ31B-H24Zinc Zamak 3Plastic ABS (bulk/injection)Plastic PolycarbonatePlastic POM/AcetalPlastic Nylon PA6Plastic Nylon PA66Plastic PEEKPlastic UHMWPEPlastic HDPEPlastic PolypropylenePlastic PMMAFDM ASAFDM PolycarbonateFDM PAHT-CFFDM HIPSSLA Resin Tough 2000SLS PA12 NylonDMLS AlSi10Mg AluminumDMLS Ti-6Al-4V ELI TitaniumDMLS 316L Stainless SteelDMLS 17-4PH Stainless SteelAluminumSteel AISI 1018
Stiffness against density
1k10k101001kDensity (kg/m³)Yield strength (MPa)Plastic PLAPlastic PETGPlastic ABSPlastic TPUPlastic NylonRubberSteelIronTitaniumStainless 304Stainless 316Aluminum 6061-T6Aluminum 7075-T6Brass C360Copper C110GlassSteel AISI 1045Steel AISI 4340Steel A992Stainless 303Stainless 17-4PHAluminum 2024-T351Aluminum 5052-H32Aluminum 7050-T7451Titanium Ti-6Al-4VBrass C260Nickel Inconel 718Magnesium AZ31B-H24Zinc Zamak 3Plastic ABS (bulk/injection)Plastic PolycarbonatePlastic POM/AcetalPlastic Nylon PA6Plastic Nylon PA66Plastic PEEKPlastic PTFEPlastic UHMWPEPlastic HDPEPlastic PolypropylenePlastic PMMAFDM ASAFDM PolycarbonateFDM PAHT-CFFDM HIPSSLA Resin Tough 2000SLA Resin Elastic 50ASLS PA12 NylonDMLS AlSi10Mg AluminumDMLS Ti-6Al-4V ELI TitaniumDMLS 316L Stainless SteelDMLS 17-4PH Stainless SteelBrickAluminumSteel AISI 1018
Strength against density

Related comparisons