Materials / Compare

FDM ASA vs. Plastic PEEK

Compare FDM ASA vs. Plastic PEEK strength, stiffness, weight and thermal properties.

Change either side
FDM ASA3D printed (FDM)
Plastic PEEKBulk polymer (molded or machined)
Try it on a partA bracket to run stress or thermal on, free in your browserOpen in LessCADOpen in LessCAD
Mechanical
Yield strengthnot given (tensile used)98MPasourcetypical, tensile yield
Ultimate tensile strength37MPasourcetypicalnot sourced
Compressive strengthnot sourced125MPasourcetypical, 23 C
Flexural strength65MPasourcetypical165MPasourcetypical, flexural stress at yield, 23 C
Elongation at break9.2%sourcetypical25%sourcetypical, at break
Young's modulus (stiffness)2.45GPasourcetypical4GPasourcetypical (nominal)
Density1,050kg/m³sourcetypical1,300kg/m³sourcetypical (crystalline)
Strength to weight35.2kN·m/kg75.4kN·m/kg2.14x higher
Stiffness to weight2.33MN·m/kg3.08MN·m/kg32% higher
Poisson's rationot sourced0.38sourcetypical
Shear modulusnot sourced1.45GPa
Bulk modulusnot sourced5.56GPa
Speed of sound1,528m/s1,754m/s
Thermal
Thermal conductivity0.17W/m·Ksourcebase material: INEOS Styrolution Luran S 777K injection-molding ASA, typical0.29W/m·Ksourcetypical, average, 23 C
Thermal expansion80–110µm/m·Ksourcebase material: INEOS Styrolution Luran S 777K injection-molding ASA, range55µm/m·Ksourceaverage of flow/cross-flow, below Tg (<143 C)
100 mm part over a 50 °C swing475µm growth275µm growth1.73x less
Specific heatnot sourced2,200J/kg·Ksourcetypical, 23 °C, DSC (Victrex PEEK 450G TDS, revision Jul 2012)
Heats up and cools (diffusivity)not sourced0.101mm²/s
Thermal shock resistancenot sourced80.1W/m
Melting pointnot sourced343°Csourcetypical, DSC
Glass transitionnot sourced143°Csourceonset (midpoint 150 C)
Max service temperature92°CsourceHDT 1.8 MPa240°CsourceUL 746B RTI, mechanical strength (continuous use index)
Values forBambu Lab ASA, TDS V3.0, printed specimens X-Y; nozzle 260 °C, bed 80 °C, 200 mm/s, 100% infill; annealed and dried 80 °C for 12 h before testing.Victrex PEEK 450G (unreinforced, injection moulded), Victrex TDS rev. March 2026; Poisson from Victrex fluid-management flyer (2020-07)

Every value links to the document that states it. "Not sourced" means no citable source states it (or only a specification minimum); figures computed from it are left out too.

FDM ASA is 3D printed: its properties depend on build direction and print settings; these are typical values.

Questions

Is FDM ASA stronger than Plastic PEEK?

Plastic PEEK is stronger: its yield strength is 98 MPa against tensile strength 37 MPa for FDM ASA (2.65x).

Which is lighter, FDM ASA or Plastic PEEK?

FDM ASA is lighter: 1,050 kg/m³ against 1,300 kg/m³ for Plastic PEEK.

Which is stiffer, FDM ASA or Plastic PEEK?

Plastic PEEK is stiffer: Young's modulus 4 GPa against 2.45 GPa for FDM ASA, so the same part in Plastic PEEK deflects less under the same load.

Which is lighter for the same job, FDM ASA or Plastic PEEK?

For the same stiffness or strength: FDM ASA is lighter for a stiff panel or plate; Plastic PEEK is lighter for a stiff rod or tie (tension), stiff beam (bending), strong rod or tie, strong beam, strong panel or plate.

Part that must beFDM ASAPlastic PEEK
Stiff rod or tie (tension)32% heavierlighter
Stiff beam (bending)3% heavierlighter
Stiff panel or platelighter5% heavier
Strong rod or tie2.14x heavierlighter
Strong beam1.55x heavierlighter
Strong panel or plate31% heavierlighter

For the same stiffness or strength, mass scales with density over stiffness (or strength) raised to a power set by how the part is loaded: 1 for a rod in tension, 1/2 for a beam in bending, 1/3 for a panel (the standard material-selection indices).

Which conducts heat better, FDM ASA or Plastic PEEK?

Plastic PEEK conducts heat better: 0.29 W/m·K against 0.17 W/m·K for FDM ASA.

Which expands less with temperature?

Plastic PEEK expands less: 55 µm/m·K against 95 µm/m·K for FDM ASA.

Among 59 materials

1k10k0.1110100Density (kg/m³)Young's modulus (GPa)Plastic PLAPlastic PETGPlastic ABSPlastic TPUPlastic NylonAluminumSteelIronTitaniumSteel AISI 1018Stainless 304Stainless 316Aluminum 6061-T6Aluminum 7075-T6Brass C360Copper C110GlassSteel AISI 1045Steel AISI 4340Steel A992Stainless 303Stainless 17-4PHAluminum 2024-T351Aluminum 5052-H32Aluminum 7050-T7451Titanium Ti-6Al-4VBrass C260Nickel Inconel 718Magnesium AZ31B-H24Zinc Zamak 3Plastic ABS (bulk/injection)Plastic PolycarbonatePlastic POM/AcetalPlastic Nylon PA6Plastic Nylon PA66Plastic UHMWPEPlastic HDPEPlastic PolypropylenePlastic PMMAFDM PolycarbonateFDM PAHT-CFFDM HIPSSLA Resin Tough 2000SLS PA12 NylonDMLS AlSi10Mg AluminumDMLS Ti-6Al-4V ELI TitaniumDMLS 316L Stainless SteelDMLS 17-4PH Stainless SteelFDM ASAPlastic PEEK
Stiffness against density
1k10k101001kDensity (kg/m³)Yield strength (MPa)Plastic PLAPlastic PETGPlastic ABSPlastic TPUPlastic NylonRubberAluminumSteelIronTitaniumSteel AISI 1018Stainless 304Stainless 316Aluminum 6061-T6Aluminum 7075-T6Brass C360Copper C110GlassSteel AISI 1045Steel AISI 4340Steel A992Stainless 303Stainless 17-4PHAluminum 2024-T351Aluminum 5052-H32Aluminum 7050-T7451Titanium Ti-6Al-4VBrass C260Nickel Inconel 718Magnesium AZ31B-H24Zinc Zamak 3Plastic ABS (bulk/injection)Plastic PolycarbonatePlastic POM/AcetalPlastic Nylon PA6Plastic Nylon PA66Plastic PTFEPlastic UHMWPEPlastic HDPEPlastic PolypropylenePlastic PMMAFDM PolycarbonateFDM PAHT-CFFDM HIPSSLA Resin Tough 2000SLA Resin Elastic 50ASLS PA12 NylonDMLS AlSi10Mg AluminumDMLS Ti-6Al-4V ELI TitaniumDMLS 316L Stainless SteelDMLS 17-4PH Stainless SteelBrickFDM ASAPlastic PEEK
Strength against density

Related comparisons