Materials / Compare

Brass C360 vs. Plastic PLA

Compare Brass C360 vs. Plastic PLA strength, stiffness, weight and thermal properties.

Change either side
Brass C360Wrought
Plastic PLA3D printed (FDM)
Try it on a partA bracket to run stress or thermal on, free in your browserOpen in LessCADOpen in LessCAD
Mechanical
Yield strength310MPasourcetypical, 0.5% extension under load52.5MPasourcetypical
Ultimate tensile strength400MPasourcetypical52.5MPasourcetypical, peak stress (= stress at yield)
Flexural strengthnot sourced96.8MPasourcetypical
Elongation at break25%sourcetypical, 1 in. rod7.8%sourcetypical
Young's modulus (stiffness)96.5GPasourcetypical, temper-independent3.25GPasourcetypical
Density8,498kg/m³sourcenominal1,240kg/m³sourcetypical
Strength to weight36.5kN·m/kg42.3kN·m/kg16% higher
Stiffness to weight11.4MN·m/kg4.33x higher2.62MN·m/kg
Poisson's ratio0.34sourcebase material: leaded free-machining brass CuZn39Pb2 (C37700), Wieland-Z30 rolled products, reference value at room temperaturenot sourced
Shear modulus36GPanot sourced
Bulk modulus101GPanot sourced
Speed of sound3,370m/s1,619m/s
Thermal
Thermal conductivity116W/m·Ksourcetypical, 20 °C0.13W/m·Ksourcebase material: NatureWorks Ingeo biopolymer, amorphous sheet, 25 °C
Thermal expansion20.5µm/m·Ksourcetypical, mean 20-300 °Cnot sourced
100 mm part over a 50 °C swing103µm growthnot sourced
Specific heat377J/kg·Ksourcetypical, 20 °C1,200J/kg·Ksourcebase material: NatureWorks Ingeo biopolymer, amorphous sheet, 25 °C
Heats up and cools (diffusivity)36.2mm²/s415x faster0.0874mm²/s
Thermal shock resistance11,997W/mnot sourced
Melting point888–899°Csourcesolidus-liquidus152°Csourcetypical
Glass transitionnot sourced59.1°Csourcetypical
Max service temperaturenot sourced58.8°CsourceHDT 0.455 MPa (printed specimens)
Values forC36000 free-cutting brass, H02 half-hard rod 1 in. section (20% cold work), copper.org typical valuesUltimaker PLA, 3D-printed specimens, XY (flat) orientation; Ultimaker S5 Pro, engineering intent profile, 0.15 mm layer height, AA 0.4 print core, 100% infill, Cura 4.9, printed one-at-a-time, conditioned >=24 h at room temperature. TDS dated April 20, 2022.

Every value links to the document that states it. "Not sourced" means no citable source states it (or only a specification minimum); figures computed from it are left out too.

Plastic PLA is 3D printed: its properties depend on build direction and print settings; these are typical values.

Questions

Is Brass C360 stronger than Plastic PLA?

Brass C360 is stronger: its yield strength is 310 MPa against 52.5 MPa for Plastic PLA (5.9x).

Which is lighter, Brass C360 or Plastic PLA?

Plastic PLA is lighter: 1,240 kg/m³ against 8,498 kg/m³ for Brass C360.

Which is stiffer, Brass C360 or Plastic PLA?

Brass C360 is stiffer: Young's modulus 96.5 GPa against 3.25 GPa for Plastic PLA, so the same part in Brass C360 deflects less under the same load.

Which is lighter for the same job, Brass C360 or Plastic PLA?

For the same stiffness or strength: Brass C360 is lighter for a stiff rod or tie (tension); Plastic PLA is lighter for a stiff beam (bending), stiff panel or plate, strong rod or tie, strong beam, strong panel or plate.

Part that must beBrass C360Plastic PLA
Stiff rod or tie (tension)lighter4.33x heavier
Stiff beam (bending)26% heavierlighter
Stiff panel or plate2.21x heavierlighter
Strong rod or tie16% heavierlighter
Strong beam2.1x heavierlighter
Strong panel or plate2.82x heavierlighter

For the same stiffness or strength, mass scales with density over stiffness (or strength) raised to a power set by how the part is loaded: 1 for a rod in tension, 1/2 for a beam in bending, 1/3 for a panel (the standard material-selection indices).

Which conducts heat better, Brass C360 or Plastic PLA?

Brass C360 conducts heat better: 116 W/m·K against 0.13 W/m·K for Plastic PLA.

Among 59 materials

1k10k0.1110100Density (kg/m³)Young's modulus (GPa)Plastic PETGPlastic ABSPlastic TPUPlastic NylonAluminumSteelIronTitaniumSteel AISI 1018Stainless 304Stainless 316Aluminum 6061-T6Aluminum 7075-T6Copper C110GlassSteel AISI 1045Steel AISI 4340Steel A992Stainless 303Stainless 17-4PHAluminum 2024-T351Aluminum 5052-H32Aluminum 7050-T7451Titanium Ti-6Al-4VBrass C260Nickel Inconel 718Magnesium AZ31B-H24Zinc Zamak 3Plastic ABS (bulk/injection)Plastic PolycarbonatePlastic POM/AcetalPlastic Nylon PA6Plastic Nylon PA66Plastic PEEKPlastic UHMWPEPlastic HDPEPlastic PolypropylenePlastic PMMAFDM ASAFDM PolycarbonateFDM PAHT-CFFDM HIPSSLA Resin Tough 2000SLS PA12 NylonDMLS AlSi10Mg AluminumDMLS Ti-6Al-4V ELI TitaniumDMLS 316L Stainless SteelDMLS 17-4PH Stainless SteelBrass C360Plastic PLA
Stiffness against density
1k10k101001kDensity (kg/m³)Yield strength (MPa)Plastic PETGPlastic ABSPlastic TPUPlastic NylonRubberAluminumSteelIronTitaniumSteel AISI 1018Stainless 304Stainless 316Aluminum 6061-T6Aluminum 7075-T6Copper C110GlassSteel AISI 1045Steel AISI 4340Steel A992Stainless 303Stainless 17-4PHAluminum 2024-T351Aluminum 5052-H32Aluminum 7050-T7451Titanium Ti-6Al-4VBrass C260Nickel Inconel 718Magnesium AZ31B-H24Zinc Zamak 3Plastic ABS (bulk/injection)Plastic PolycarbonatePlastic POM/AcetalPlastic Nylon PA6Plastic Nylon PA66Plastic PEEKPlastic PTFEPlastic UHMWPEPlastic HDPEPlastic PolypropylenePlastic PMMAFDM ASAFDM PolycarbonateFDM PAHT-CFFDM HIPSSLA Resin Tough 2000SLA Resin Elastic 50ASLS PA12 NylonDMLS AlSi10Mg AluminumDMLS Ti-6Al-4V ELI TitaniumDMLS 316L Stainless SteelDMLS 17-4PH Stainless SteelBrickBrass C360Plastic PLA
Strength against density

Related comparisons