Materials / Compare
FDM Polycarbonate vs. Plastic PLA
Compare FDM Polycarbonate vs. Plastic PLA strength, stiffness, weight and thermal properties.
| Try it on a partA bracket to run stress or thermal on, free in your browser | Open in LessCAD | Open in LessCAD |
|---|---|---|
| Mechanical | ||
| Yield strength | 53.3MPasourcetypical | 52.5MPasourcetypical |
| Ultimate tensile strength | 53.3MPasourcetypical, peak stress (= stress at yield) | 52.5MPasourcetypical, peak stress (= stress at yield) |
| Flexural strength | 89.4MPasourcetypical | 96.8MPasourcetypical |
| Elongation at break | 9.2%sourcetypical18% more ductile | 7.8%sourcetypical |
| Young's modulus (stiffness) | 2.39GPasourcetypical | 3.25GPasourcetypical36% stiffer |
| Density | 1,180–1,200kg/m³sourcerange | 1,240kg/m³sourcetypical |
| Strength to weight | 44.8kN·m/kg6% higher | 42.3kN·m/kg |
| Stiffness to weight | 2.01MN·m/kg | 2.62MN·m/kg30% higher |
| Poisson's ratio | 0.38sourcebase material: polycarbonate family typical (Covestro Part and Mold Design guide, Table 3-1) | not sourced |
| Shear modulus | 0.867GPa | not sourced |
| Bulk modulus | 3.33GPa | not sourced |
| Speed of sound | 1,418m/s | 1,619m/s |
| Thermal | ||
| Thermal conductivity | 0.2W/m·Ksourcebase material: Covestro Makrolon 2405 injection-molding PC, typical, through-plane, 23 °C | 0.13W/m·Ksourcebase material: NatureWorks Ingeo biopolymer, amorphous sheet, 25 °C |
| Thermal expansion | 65µm/m·Ksourcebase material: Covestro Makrolon 2405 injection-molding PC, typical, 23-55 °C, parallel | not sourced |
| 100 mm part over a 50 °C swing | 325µm growth | not sourced |
| Specific heat | not sourced | 1,200J/kg·Ksourcebase material: NatureWorks Ingeo biopolymer, amorphous sheet, 25 °C |
| Heats up and cools (diffusivity) | not sourced | 0.0874mm²/s |
| Thermal shock resistance | 42.5W/m | not sourced |
| Melting point | not sourced | 152°Csourcetypical |
| Glass transition | 108°Csourcetypical | 59.1°Csourcetypical |
| Max service temperature | 105°CsourceHDT 0.455 MPa (printed specimens)1.78x hotter | 58.8°CsourceHDT 0.455 MPa (printed specimens) |
| Values for | Ultimaker PC, 3D-printed specimens, XY (flat); Ultimaker S5 Pro, engineering intent profile, 0.15 mm layer height, AA 0.4 print core, 100% infill, Cura 4.9, printed one-at-a-time, conditioned >=24 h at room temperature. TDS (file v5.00), April 20, 2022. | Ultimaker PLA, 3D-printed specimens, XY (flat) orientation; Ultimaker S5 Pro, engineering intent profile, 0.15 mm layer height, AA 0.4 print core, 100% infill, Cura 4.9, printed one-at-a-time, conditioned >=24 h at room temperature. TDS dated April 20, 2022. |
Every value links to the document that states it. "Not sourced" means no citable source states it (or only a specification minimum); figures computed from it are left out too.
FDM Polycarbonate and Plastic PLA are 3D printed: their properties depend on build direction and print settings; these are typical values.
Questions
Is FDM Polycarbonate stronger than Plastic PLA?
FDM Polycarbonate is stronger: its yield strength is 53.3 MPa against 52.5 MPa for Plastic PLA (2%).
Which is lighter, FDM Polycarbonate or Plastic PLA?
FDM Polycarbonate is lighter: 1,190 kg/m³ against 1,240 kg/m³ for Plastic PLA.
Which is stiffer, FDM Polycarbonate or Plastic PLA?
Plastic PLA is stiffer: Young's modulus 3.25 GPa against 2.39 GPa for FDM Polycarbonate, so the same part in Plastic PLA deflects less under the same load.
Which is lighter for the same job, FDM Polycarbonate or Plastic PLA?
For the same stiffness or strength: FDM Polycarbonate is lighter for a strong rod or tie, strong beam, strong panel or plate; Plastic PLA is lighter for a stiff rod or tie (tension), stiff beam (bending), stiff panel or plate.
| Part that must be | FDM Polycarbonate | Plastic PLA |
|---|---|---|
| Stiff rod or tie (tension) | 30% heavier | lighter |
| Stiff beam (bending) | 12% heavier | lighter |
| Stiff panel or plate | 6% heavier | lighter |
| Strong rod or tie | lighter | 6% heavier |
| Strong beam | lighter | 5% heavier |
| Strong panel or plate | lighter | 5% heavier |
For the same stiffness or strength, mass scales with density over stiffness (or strength) raised to a power set by how the part is loaded: 1 for a rod in tension, 1/2 for a beam in bending, 1/3 for a panel (the standard material-selection indices).
Which is more ductile, FDM Polycarbonate or Plastic PLA?
FDM Polycarbonate stretches further before it breaks: 9.2% elongation at break against 7.8% for Plastic PLA.
Which handles higher temperatures, FDM Polycarbonate or Plastic PLA?
FDM Polycarbonate does: 105 °C against 58.8 °C for Plastic PLA, both HDT 0.455 MPa (printed specimens).
Which conducts heat better, FDM Polycarbonate or Plastic PLA?
FDM Polycarbonate conducts heat better: 0.2 W/m·K against 0.13 W/m·K for Plastic PLA.
Among 59 materials
Related comparisons
- FDM Polycarbonate vs. Plastic Nylon
- FDM Polycarbonate vs. Plastic Polycarbonate
- FDM Polycarbonate vs. Plastic ABS (bulk/injection)
- FDM Polycarbonate vs. SLA Resin Standard
- Plastic PLA vs. SLA Resin Standard
- Plastic PLA vs. Plastic POM/Acetal
- Plastic PLA vs. Plastic Polycarbonate
- Plastic PLA vs. Plastic Nylon