Materials / Compare
Plastic PLA vs. Plastic Polycarbonate
Compare Plastic PLA vs. Plastic Polycarbonate strength, stiffness, weight and thermal properties.
| Try it on a partA bracket to run stress or thermal on, free in your browser | Open in LessCAD | Open in LessCAD |
|---|---|---|
| Mechanical | ||
| Yield strength | 52.5MPasourcetypical | 65MPasourcetypical, tensile yield |
| Ultimate tensile strength | 52.5MPasourcetypical, peak stress (= stress at yield) | 65MPasourcetypical, stress at break |
| Flexural strength | 96.8MPasourcetypical | 97MPasourcetypical, flexural strength |
| Elongation at break | 7.8%sourcetypical | 125%sourcetypical, strain at break |
| Young's modulus (stiffness) | 3.25GPasourcetypical35% stiffer | 2.4GPasourcetypical |
| Density | 1,240kg/m³sourcetypical | 1,200kg/m³sourcetypical |
| Strength to weight | 42.3kN·m/kg | 54.2kN·m/kg28% higher |
| Stiffness to weight | 2.62MN·m/kg31% higher | 2MN·m/kg |
| Poisson's ratio | not sourced | 0.38sourcetypical, polycarbonate family (Covestro Part and Mold Design guide, Table 3-1) |
| Shear modulus | not sourced | 0.87GPa |
| Bulk modulus | not sourced | 3.33GPa |
| Speed of sound | 1,619m/s | 1,414m/s |
| Thermal | ||
| Thermal conductivity | 0.13W/m·Ksourcebase material: NatureWorks Ingeo biopolymer, amorphous sheet, 25 °C | 0.2W/m·Ksourcetypical, through-plane, 23 C |
| Thermal expansion | not sourced | 65µm/m·Ksourcetypical, 23-55 C, parallel and normal |
| 100 mm part over a 50 °C swing | not sourced | 325µm growth |
| Specific heat | 1,200J/kg·Ksourcebase material: NatureWorks Ingeo biopolymer, amorphous sheet, 25 °C | 1,172J/kg·Ksourcetypical (guide value), Bayer ASTM datasheet for Makrolon 2405, ASTM D 2766 |
| Heats up and cools (diffusivity) | 0.0874mm²/s | 0.142mm²/s1.63x faster |
| Thermal shock resistance | not sourced | 51.7W/m |
| Melting point | 152°Csourcetypical | not sourced |
| Glass transition | 59.1°Csourcetypical | 144°Csourcetypical, DSC 10 C/min |
| Max service temperature | 58.8°CsourceHDT 0.455 MPa (printed specimens) | 125°CsourceUL 746B RTI, tensile strength, 1.5 mm |
| Values for | Ultimaker PLA, 3D-printed specimens, XY (flat) orientation; Ultimaker S5 Pro, engineering intent profile, 0.15 mm layer height, AA 0.4 print core, 100% infill, Cura 4.9, printed one-at-a-time, conditioned >=24 h at room temperature. TDS dated April 20, 2022. | Covestro Makrolon 2405 general-purpose PC (MVR 19), Covestro technical datasheet version 2026-09-28, typical values |
Every value links to the document that states it. "Not sourced" means no citable source states it (or only a specification minimum); figures computed from it are left out too.
Plastic PLA is 3D printed: its properties depend on build direction and print settings; these are typical values.
Questions
Is Plastic PLA stronger than Plastic Polycarbonate?
Plastic Polycarbonate is stronger: its yield strength is 65 MPa against 52.5 MPa for Plastic PLA (24%).
Which is lighter, Plastic PLA or Plastic Polycarbonate?
Plastic Polycarbonate is lighter: 1,200 kg/m³ against 1,240 kg/m³ for Plastic PLA.
Which is stiffer, Plastic PLA or Plastic Polycarbonate?
Plastic PLA is stiffer: Young's modulus 3.25 GPa against 2.4 GPa for Plastic Polycarbonate, so the same part in Plastic PLA deflects less under the same load.
Which is lighter for the same job, Plastic PLA or Plastic Polycarbonate?
For the same stiffness or strength: Plastic PLA is lighter for a stiff rod or tie (tension), stiff beam (bending), stiff panel or plate; Plastic Polycarbonate is lighter for a strong rod or tie, strong beam, strong panel or plate.
| Part that must be | Plastic PLA | Plastic Polycarbonate |
|---|---|---|
| Stiff rod or tie (tension) | lighter | 31% heavier |
| Stiff beam (bending) | lighter | 13% heavier |
| Stiff panel or plate | lighter | 7% heavier |
| Strong rod or tie | 28% heavier | lighter |
| Strong beam | 19% heavier | lighter |
| Strong panel or plate | 15% heavier | lighter |
For the same stiffness or strength, mass scales with density over stiffness (or strength) raised to a power set by how the part is loaded: 1 for a rod in tension, 1/2 for a beam in bending, 1/3 for a panel (the standard material-selection indices).
Which conducts heat better, Plastic PLA or Plastic Polycarbonate?
Plastic Polycarbonate conducts heat better: 0.2 W/m·K against 0.13 W/m·K for Plastic PLA.
Among 59 materials
Related comparisons
- Plastic PLA vs. SLA Resin Standard
- Plastic PLA vs. FDM Polycarbonate
- Plastic PLA vs. Plastic POM/Acetal
- Plastic PLA vs. Plastic Nylon
- Plastic Polycarbonate vs. Plastic Nylon
- Plastic Polycarbonate vs. SLA Resin Standard
- Plastic Polycarbonate vs. FDM Polycarbonate
- Plastic Polycarbonate vs. Plastic POM/Acetal