Materials / Compare
Ceramic Alumina 96% vs. Magnesium AZ31B-H24
Compare Ceramic Alumina 96% vs. Magnesium AZ31B-H24 strength, stiffness, weight and thermal properties.
| Try it on a partA sample part to run stress or thermal on, free in your browser | Open in LessCAD | Open in LessCAD |
|---|---|---|
| Mechanical | ||
| Yield strength | not given (tensile used) | 220MPasourcetypical, H24, 0.5-6 mm, 0.2 % proof stress |
| Ultimate tensile strength | 221MPasourcetypical tensile strength, 25 °C (ACMA Test #4) | 290MPasourcetypical, H24, 0.5-6 mm |
| Compressive strength | 2,068MPasourcetypical, 20 °C (ASTM-C773) | not sourced |
| Flexural strength | 358MPasourceflexural strength (MOR), 20 °C (ASTM-F417) | not sourced |
| Elongation at break | not sourced | 13%sourcetypical, H24, 0.5-6 mm, gauge 5.65√A |
| Young's modulus (stiffness) | 303GPasourcetypical, 20 °C (ASTM-C848) | 44.8GPasourcetypical (handbook physical constant) |
| Density | 3,720kg/m³sourcetypical (ASTM-C20) | 1,769kg/m³sourcenominal |
| Strength to weight | 59.4kN·m/kg | 124kN·m/kg2.09x higher |
| Stiffness to weight | 81.5MN·m/kg3.22x higher | 25.3MN·m/kg |
| Poisson's ratio | 0.21sourcetypical, 20 °C (ASTM-C848) | 0.35sourcetypical (handbook physical constant) |
| Shear modulus | 125GPa7.55x stiffer in shear | 16.6GPa |
| Bulk modulus | 174GPa | 49.8GPa |
| Speed of sound | 9,025m/s | 5,032m/s |
| Thermal | ||
| Thermal conductivity | 24.7W/m·Ksourcetypical, 20 °C (ASTM-C408) | 76.9W/m·Ksourcetypical (temper/temperature not stated) |
| Thermal expansion | 8.2µm/m·Ksourcemean, 25-1000 °C (ASTM-C372) | 26.8µm/m·Ksourcetypical (temperature range not stated) |
| 100 mm part over a 50 °C swing | 41µm growth3.27x less | 134µm growth |
| Specific heat | 880J/kg·Ksourcetypical, 100 °C (ASTM-E1269) | 1,040J/kg·Ksourcetypical |
| Heats up and cools (diffusivity) | 7.55mm²/s | 41.8mm²/s5.54x faster |
| Thermal shock resistance | 1,736W/m | 9,159W/m5.28x more resistant |
| Max service temperature | not sourced | 149°Csourcestated application limit |
| Values for | CoorsTek AD-96, nominal 96% Al2O3 sintered alumina, typical values; CoorsTek "Ceramic Seal Material Properties" (© 2018, 01899 F). AD-96 is the general 96% grade, not the ADS-96R substrate grade. | AZ31B-H24 sheet 0.016-0.062 in., MIL-HDBK-5J Table 4.2.1.0(b) (AMS 4377); strengths are S-basis MINIMUMS |
Every value links to the document that states it. "Not sourced" means no citable source states it (or only a specification minimum); figures computed from it are left out too.
Questions
Is Ceramic Alumina 96% stronger than Magnesium AZ31B-H24?
Ceramic Alumina 96% is stronger: its tensile strength is 221 MPa against yield strength 220 MPa for Magnesium AZ31B-H24 (0%).
Which is lighter, Ceramic Alumina 96% or Magnesium AZ31B-H24?
Magnesium AZ31B-H24 is lighter: 1,769 kg/m³ against 3,720 kg/m³ for Ceramic Alumina 96%.
Which is stiffer, Ceramic Alumina 96% or Magnesium AZ31B-H24?
Ceramic Alumina 96% is stiffer: Young's modulus 303 GPa against 44.8 GPa for Magnesium AZ31B-H24, so the same part in Ceramic Alumina 96% deflects less under the same load.
Which is lighter for the same job, Ceramic Alumina 96% or Magnesium AZ31B-H24?
For the same stiffness or strength: Ceramic Alumina 96% is lighter for a stiff rod or tie (tension), stiff beam (bending); Magnesium AZ31B-H24 is lighter for a stiff panel or plate, strong rod or tie, strong beam, strong panel or plate.
| Part that must be | Ceramic Alumina 96% | Magnesium AZ31B-H24 |
|---|---|---|
| Stiff rod or tie (tension) | lighter | 3.22x heavier |
| Stiff beam (bending) | lighter | 24% heavier |
| Stiff panel or plate | 11% heavier | lighter |
| Strong rod or tie | 2.09x heavier | lighter |
| Strong beam | 2.1x heavier | lighter |
| Strong panel or plate | 2.1x heavier | lighter |
For the same stiffness or strength, mass scales with density over stiffness (or strength) raised to a power set by how the part is loaded: 1 for a rod in tension, 1/2 for a beam in bending, 1/3 for a panel (the standard material-selection indices).
Which conducts heat better, Ceramic Alumina 96% or Magnesium AZ31B-H24?
Magnesium AZ31B-H24 conducts heat better: 76.9 W/m·K against 24.7 W/m·K for Ceramic Alumina 96%.
Which expands less with temperature?
Ceramic Alumina 96% expands less: 8.2 µm/m·K against 26.8 µm/m·K for Magnesium AZ31B-H24.
Among 72 materials
Related comparisons
- Ceramic Alumina 96% vs. Ceramic Aluminum Nitride
- Ceramic Alumina 96% vs. Concrete
- Ceramic Alumina 96% vs. Iron
- Ceramic Alumina 96% vs. Stainless Steel 303
- Magnesium AZ31B-H24 vs. Magnesium AZ91D
- Magnesium AZ31B-H24 vs. Concrete
- Magnesium AZ31B-H24 vs. Aluminum 6063-T6
- Magnesium AZ31B-H24 vs. Aluminum 5052-H32