Materials / Compare

Ceramic Alumina 96% vs. Zinc Zamak 3

Compare Ceramic Alumina 96% vs. Zinc Zamak 3 strength, stiffness, weight and thermal properties.

Change either side
Ceramic Alumina 96%Sintered ceramic (pressed and fired)
Zinc Zamak 3Cast
Try it on a partA sample part to run stress or thermal on, free in your browserOpen in LessCADOpen in LessCAD
Mechanical
Yield strengthnot given (tensile used)221MPasourcetypical
Ultimate tensile strength221MPasourcetypical tensile strength, 25 °C (ACMA Test #4)283MPasourcetypical
Compressive strength2,068MPasourcetypical, 20 °C (ASTM-C773)not sourced
Flexural strength358MPasourceflexural strength (MOR), 20 °C (ASTM-F417)not sourced
Elongation at breaknot sourced10%sourcetypical, in 2 in.
Young's modulus (stiffness)303GPasourcetypical, 20 °C (ASTM-C848)85.5GPasourcetypical
Density3,720kg/m³sourcetypical (ASTM-C20)6,600kg/m³sourcetypical
Strength to weight59.4kN·m/kg1.77x higher33.5kN·m/kg
Stiffness to weight81.5MN·m/kg6.29x higher13MN·m/kg
Poisson's ratio0.21sourcetypical, 20 °C (ASTM-C848)0.27sourcetypical, Zamak 3 hot-chamber die cast
Shear modulus125GPa3.72x stiffer in shear33.7GPa
Bulk modulus174GPa62GPa
Speed of sound9,025m/s3,599m/s
Thermal
Thermal conductivity24.7W/m·Ksourcetypical, 20 °C (ASTM-C408)113W/m·Ksourcetypical
Thermal expansion8.2µm/m·Ksourcemean, 25-1000 °C (ASTM-C372)27.4µm/m·Ksourcetypical
100 mm part over a 50 °C swing41µm growth3.34x less137µm growth
Specific heat880J/kg·Ksourcetypical, 100 °C (ASTM-E1269)419J/kg·Ksourcetypical
Heats up and cools (diffusivity)7.55mm²/s40.9mm²/s5.42x faster
Thermal shock resistance1,736W/m7,782W/m4.48x more resistant
Melting pointnot sourced381–387°Csourcemelting range
Values forCoorsTek AD-96, nominal 96% Al2O3 sintered alumina, typical values; CoorsTek "Ceramic Seal Material Properties" (© 2018, 01899 F). AD-96 is the general 96% grade, not the ADS-96R substrate grade.Zamak 3 (ASTM B86 die cast), Nathan Trotter (zinc alloy producer) technical data sheet, typical values

Every value links to the document that states it. "Not sourced" means no citable source states it (or only a specification minimum); figures computed from it are left out too.

Questions

Is Ceramic Alumina 96% stronger than Zinc Zamak 3?

Ceramic Alumina 96% is stronger: its tensile strength is 221 MPa against yield strength 221 MPa for Zinc Zamak 3 (0%).

Which is lighter, Ceramic Alumina 96% or Zinc Zamak 3?

Ceramic Alumina 96% is lighter: 3,720 kg/m³ against 6,600 kg/m³ for Zinc Zamak 3.

Which is stiffer, Ceramic Alumina 96% or Zinc Zamak 3?

Ceramic Alumina 96% is stiffer: Young's modulus 303 GPa against 85.5 GPa for Zinc Zamak 3, so the same part in Ceramic Alumina 96% deflects less under the same load.

Which is lighter for the same job, Ceramic Alumina 96% or Zinc Zamak 3?

For the same stiffness or strength: Ceramic Alumina 96% is lighter for a stiff rod or tie (tension), stiff beam (bending), stiff panel or plate, strong rod or tie, strong beam, strong panel or plate.

Part that must beCeramic Alumina 96%Zinc Zamak 3
Stiff rod or tie (tension)lighter6.29x heavier
Stiff beam (bending)lighter3.34x heavier
Stiff panel or platelighter2.7x heavier
Strong rod or tielighter1.77x heavier
Strong beamlighter1.77x heavier
Strong panel or platelighter1.77x heavier

For the same stiffness or strength, mass scales with density over stiffness (or strength) raised to a power set by how the part is loaded: 1 for a rod in tension, 1/2 for a beam in bending, 1/3 for a panel (the standard material-selection indices).

Which conducts heat better, Ceramic Alumina 96% or Zinc Zamak 3?

Zinc Zamak 3 conducts heat better: 113 W/m·K against 24.7 W/m·K for Ceramic Alumina 96%.

Which expands less with temperature?

Ceramic Alumina 96% expands less: 8.2 µm/m·K against 27.4 µm/m·K for Zinc Zamak 3.

Among 72 materials

1k10k0.1110100Density (kg/m³)Young's modulus (GPa)Plastic PLAPlastic PETGPlastic ABSPlastic TPUPlastic NylonAluminumSteelIronTitaniumSteel AISI 1018Stainless Steel 304Stainless Steel 316Aluminum 6061-T6Aluminum 7075-T6Brass C360Copper C110GlassSteel AISI 1045Steel AISI 4340Steel A992Stainless Steel 303Stainless Steel 17-4PHAluminum 2024-T351Aluminum 5052-H32Aluminum 7050-T7451Titanium Ti-6Al-4VBrass C260Nickel Inconel 718Magnesium AZ31B-H24Plastic ABS (bulk/injection)Plastic PolycarbonatePlastic POM/AcetalPlastic Nylon PA6Plastic Nylon PA66Plastic PEEKPlastic UHMWPEPlastic HDPEPlastic PolypropylenePlastic PMMAFDM ASAFDM PolycarbonateFDM PAHT-CFFDM HIPSSLA Resin Tough 2000SLS PA12 NylonDMLS AlSi10Mg AluminumDMLS Ti-6Al-4V ELI TitaniumDMLS 316L Stainless SteelDMLS 17-4PH Stainless SteelPCB Laminate FR-4SiliconCeramic Aluminum NitrideAluminum A380Aluminum 6063-T6Aluminum 1100-OAluminum ADC12Magnesium AZ91DSolder SAC305Plastic PBT GF30Plastic PPS GF40Plastic LCP GF30Ceramic Alumina 96%Zinc Zamak 3
Stiffness against density
1k10k101001kDensity (kg/m³)Yield strength (MPa)Plastic PLAPlastic PETGPlastic ABSPlastic TPUPlastic NylonRubberAluminumSteelIronTitaniumSteel AISI 1018Stainless Steel 304Stainless Steel 316Aluminum 6061-T6Aluminum 7075-T6Brass C360Copper C110GlassSteel AISI 1045Steel AISI 4340Steel A992Stainless Steel 303Stainless Steel 17-4PHAluminum 2024-T351Aluminum 5052-H32Aluminum 7050-T7451Titanium Ti-6Al-4VBrass C260Nickel Inconel 718Magnesium AZ31B-H24Plastic ABS (bulk/injection)Plastic PolycarbonatePlastic POM/AcetalPlastic Nylon PA6Plastic Nylon PA66Plastic PEEKPlastic PTFEPlastic UHMWPEPlastic HDPEPlastic PolypropylenePlastic PMMAFDM ASAFDM PolycarbonateFDM PAHT-CFFDM HIPSSLA Resin Tough 2000SLA Resin Elastic 50ASLS PA12 NylonDMLS AlSi10Mg AluminumDMLS Ti-6Al-4V ELI TitaniumDMLS 316L Stainless SteelDMLS 17-4PH Stainless SteelBrickPCB Laminate FR-4SiliconAluminum A380Aluminum 6063-T6Aluminum 1100-OAluminum ADC12Magnesium AZ91DSolder SAC305Plastic PBT GF30Plastic PPS GF40Plastic LCP GF30Ceramic Alumina 96%Zinc Zamak 3
Strength against density

Related comparisons