Materials / Compare

Copper C110 vs. Plastic HDPE

Compare Copper C110 vs. Plastic HDPE strength, stiffness, weight and thermal properties.

Change either side
Copper C110Wrought
Plastic HDPEBulk polymer (molded or machined)
Try it on a partA bracket to run stress or thermal on, free in your browserOpen in LessCADOpen in LessCAD
Mechanical
Yield strength69MPasourcetypical, 0.5% extension under load24MPasourcetypical, tensile stress at yield 23 °C, 50 mm/min ISO 527
Ultimate tensile strength221MPasourcetypicalnot sourced
Elongation at break55%sourcetypical, 1 in. rodnot sourced
Young's modulus (stiffness)117GPasourcetypical0.9GPasourcetypical, tensile modulus 23 °C ISO 527
Density8,913kg/m³sourcenominal950kg/m³sourcetypical, ISO 1183
Strength to weight7.74kN·m/kg25.3kN·m/kg3.26x higher
Stiffness to weight13.1MN·m/kg13.9x higher0.947MN·m/kg
Poisson's ratio0.34sourcereference value at room temperature (Wieland-K32 = Cu-ETP = C11000, rolled products)0.4–0.45sourcebase material: high-density polyethylene family (INEOS Olefins & Polymers USA, Typical Engineering Properties of HDPE)
Shear modulus43.7GPa138x stiffer in shear0.316GPa
Bulk modulus122GPa2GPa
Speed of sound3,626m/s973m/s
Thermal
Thermal conductivity391W/m·Ksourcetypical, 20 °C0.4–0.49W/m·Ksourcebase material: high-density polyethylene family (INEOS Olefins & Polymers USA, Typical Engineering Properties of HDPE)
Thermal expansion16.9µm/m·Ksourcetypical, mean 20-100 °C120µm/m·Ksourcebase material: high-density polyethylene family (INEOS Olefins & Polymers USA, Typical Engineering Properties of HDPE)
100 mm part over a 50 °C swing84.5µm growth7.1x less600µm growth
Specific heat385J/kg·Ksourcetypical, 20 °C2,250J/kg·Ksourcebase material: high-density polyethylene family (INEOS Olefins & Polymers USA, Typical Engineering Properties of HDPE)
Heats up and cools (diffusivity)114mm²/s547x faster0.208mm²/s
Thermal shock resistance8,992W/m158x more resistant56.9W/m
Melting point1,065–1,083°Csourcesolidus-liquidusnot sourced
Values forC11000 ETP copper, annealed to 0.050 mm grain size (OS050), 1 in. rod, copper.org typical valuesLyondellBasell Hostalen 23050 B high density polyethylene, typical ISO values

Every value links to the document that states it. "Not sourced" means no citable source states it (or only a specification minimum); figures computed from it are left out too.

Questions

Is Copper C110 stronger than Plastic HDPE?

Copper C110 is stronger: its yield strength is 69 MPa against 24 MPa for Plastic HDPE (2.88x).

Which is lighter, Copper C110 or Plastic HDPE?

Plastic HDPE is lighter: 950 kg/m³ against 8,913 kg/m³ for Copper C110.

Which is stiffer, Copper C110 or Plastic HDPE?

Copper C110 is stiffer: Young's modulus 117 GPa against 0.9 GPa for Plastic HDPE, so the same part in Copper C110 deflects less under the same load.

Which is lighter for the same job, Copper C110 or Plastic HDPE?

For the same stiffness or strength: Copper C110 is lighter for a stiff rod or tie (tension), stiff beam (bending); Plastic HDPE is lighter for a stiff panel or plate, strong rod or tie, strong beam, strong panel or plate.

Part that must beCopper C110Plastic HDPE
Stiff rod or tie (tension)lighter13.9x heavier
Stiff beam (bending)lighter22% heavier
Stiff panel or plate1.85x heavierlighter
Strong rod or tie3.26x heavierlighter
Strong beam4.64x heavierlighter
Strong panel or plate5.53x heavierlighter

For the same stiffness or strength, mass scales with density over stiffness (or strength) raised to a power set by how the part is loaded: 1 for a rod in tension, 1/2 for a beam in bending, 1/3 for a panel (the standard material-selection indices).

Which conducts heat better, Copper C110 or Plastic HDPE?

Copper C110 conducts heat better: 391 W/m·K against 0.445 W/m·K for Plastic HDPE.

Which expands less with temperature?

Copper C110 expands less: 16.9 µm/m·K against 120 µm/m·K for Plastic HDPE.

Among 59 materials

1k10k0.1110100Density (kg/m³)Young's modulus (GPa)Plastic PLAPlastic PETGPlastic ABSPlastic TPUPlastic NylonAluminumSteelIronTitaniumSteel AISI 1018Stainless 304Stainless 316Aluminum 6061-T6Aluminum 7075-T6Brass C360GlassSteel AISI 1045Steel AISI 4340Steel A992Stainless 303Stainless 17-4PHAluminum 2024-T351Aluminum 5052-H32Aluminum 7050-T7451Titanium Ti-6Al-4VBrass C260Nickel Inconel 718Magnesium AZ31B-H24Zinc Zamak 3Plastic ABS (bulk/injection)Plastic PolycarbonatePlastic POM/AcetalPlastic Nylon PA6Plastic Nylon PA66Plastic PEEKPlastic UHMWPEPlastic PolypropylenePlastic PMMAFDM ASAFDM PolycarbonateFDM PAHT-CFFDM HIPSSLA Resin Tough 2000SLS PA12 NylonDMLS AlSi10Mg AluminumDMLS Ti-6Al-4V ELI TitaniumDMLS 316L Stainless SteelDMLS 17-4PH Stainless SteelCopper C110Plastic HDPE
Stiffness against density
1k10k101001kDensity (kg/m³)Yield strength (MPa)Plastic PLAPlastic PETGPlastic ABSPlastic TPUPlastic NylonRubberAluminumSteelIronTitaniumSteel AISI 1018Stainless 304Stainless 316Aluminum 6061-T6Aluminum 7075-T6Brass C360GlassSteel AISI 1045Steel AISI 4340Steel A992Stainless 303Stainless 17-4PHAluminum 2024-T351Aluminum 5052-H32Aluminum 7050-T7451Titanium Ti-6Al-4VBrass C260Nickel Inconel 718Magnesium AZ31B-H24Zinc Zamak 3Plastic ABS (bulk/injection)Plastic PolycarbonatePlastic POM/AcetalPlastic Nylon PA6Plastic Nylon PA66Plastic PEEKPlastic PTFEPlastic UHMWPEPlastic PolypropylenePlastic PMMAFDM ASAFDM PolycarbonateFDM PAHT-CFFDM HIPSSLA Resin Tough 2000SLA Resin Elastic 50ASLS PA12 NylonDMLS AlSi10Mg AluminumDMLS Ti-6Al-4V ELI TitaniumDMLS 316L Stainless SteelDMLS 17-4PH Stainless SteelBrickCopper C110Plastic HDPE
Strength against density

Related comparisons